Our costing is no different from those in KL. Costings dictate service charges.
For just 760+ units more than 40 guards got to turn up for 12 hours work each day, for residential parcel alone.
We have three separate swimming pools and three accompanying fully air conditioned facilities such as gym, reading/game rooms, and three air cond double level grand entrance lobby with at least a guard stationed in each.
Three teams of cleaners.
Three separate car parking complexes with different entries and exits complete with three separate visitors car parking and their guards. Brightly lighted car park with electricity bill for car park lights alone at RM30k+ pm.
Double volume lobby temperature was at one time set to 22C. Now reset to 27C.
Full HD CCTV upgrading at Level 7 and inside all lifts. Access card entry to grand lobby also being installed. All paid for by JMB - not developer.
If the residents insist they want nothing less, then the expenses will all show up in costings.
I call some of these excesses. But other people call it living in reasonable style!
Maintenance fee, standard of maintenance and property value are all inter-related. The stake holders will have to decide what is a good balance for everyone.
After having seen all the info, the residential reps in Jmc feel maintaining the current level of service/costing is a good starting point in Agm.
I have made known in Jmc, personally I feel the quantum of 60% increment may be too high for some in terms of affordability. Costs cutting via rearrangements such as one guard post for all visitors' car, total guard numbers must be reduce by half, reduce electricity bill by reducing lights, switching air cond off after 10pm, etc. Management efficiency got to improve, leakages and excesses got to be controlled tightly. For example, RM10k limit for FM set since first Agm is far too high. Got to bring down to RM2k. Need to get Chairman or Treasurer approval if above RM2k. Sorry to say I have seen this approval limit been abused.
In my personal opinion current Jmc together with FM still have much to improve - especially in areas such as leakages, excesses and pro active leadership (which is sadly very lacking) including on the ground monitoring and strategizing direction of progress. Obviously, weaknesses in management efficiency will have a direct impact on service charges and future of SW.
The existing clique within Jmc that has been present since first Agm is unhealthy. Their mentality on communication and transparency leaves much to be desired. Their generosity is overwhelming to me. All at a cost to stakeholders.
Not sure there are enough people willing to volunteer their time and effort during coming Agm.
But nothing can be done unless there are other volunteers so that those who have sacrifice their effort in Jmc for two terms can finally get to retire. Fresh minds and ways of managing things are good for and in my opinion, greatly needed by Jmb.
Existing costing cannot change much if there are no significant changes in the ways SW is managed.
Good Sharing on the matters above. Can implement some steps to reduce monthly expenses for the SW? above 30 cents and above include sinking fund would be a burden cost to stay here.