seriously why I&P don't just make these overpriced dev as G&G, don't understand what's on their mind?
Irama @ Bdr Kinrara (22X70) Link house, Bandar Kinrara
Irama @ Bdr Kinrara (22X70) Link house, Bandar Kinrara
|
|
Jul 27 2013, 12:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
seriously why I&P don't just make these overpriced dev as G&G, don't understand what's on their mind?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2013, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Jul 27 2013, 10:44 PM) Certainly there are a lot buyers outside like you and do not mind or care about the G&G or F&G. Or else, I&P won't be able to sold off most of their recent linked houses at such high prices., ex. Sapphire, Emerald, Qaseh. Shake hand, you're reading out my thought as well... +1Also, there are a lot of people out there like me, very mind and care to buy a G&G ( clubhouse or not, is not a must ) or no less than a F&G with good security mindset. If my parents and sibling are going to stay with me, I don't mind to buy any new house or corner linked house without G&G as long as the house is nice, quality and good and anytime filled with my parents or more people. But if there is only my wife and / or myself for own stay, certainly whenever I plan to buy a linked house and go for own stay, G&G is my priority before price, size, developer and concept of the development. Every individual has different aspect. In terms of investment, I still prefer to go for F&G or G&G, as the similar security townships or mini is very much lesser than non G&G, hence, I believe the capital appreciation is much higher compare to the latter. Many individuals prefer to move to better security condo due to they unable to find a better security mindset non G&G and non F&G landed. If we rely on the government to do the job where we paid tax, it would be mission very impossible. |
|
|
Jul 31 2013, 04:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
incredibly priced! My eyes open wide, no need kaca mata anymore...
|
|
|
Jul 31 2013, 07:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
Thanks for the info yunalesca, so did you manage to grab one nice unit?
|
|
|
Aug 1 2013, 09:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
they price it psf, 400psf. BBB... :-p
|
|
|
Aug 1 2013, 09:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(puchongite @ Aug 1 2013, 09:28 AM) psf is getting less and less effective as a means to measure pricing. Strata title landed maybe yes laCan only use it to measure same type of property with more or less the same built up. Eg can't compare using psf when condo built up is 750 sf vs 1300 sf, and landed 2000 sf vs 3500 sf. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2013, 10:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Aug 1 2013, 10:04 AM) Effectively, it is RM 416 psf for the intermediates. Thanks Chris, that means I&P is merely selling at market price...not overpriced.Nearest size as comparison, Sapphire 22x75, built up 2433 sq ft. RM 850k to RM 900k now, RM 361-382 psf. Very few units available and majority transacted at RM 800-850k at 2012 to 2013 Q1. One nicely full reno unit, facing T-junction, asking RM 850k Emerald 22x75, built up 2433 sq ft. RM 950k to RM 1.0mil, RM 390 - 411 psf. Majority units transacted at RM 900-980k at 2012 to 2013 Q1. A lot units asking RM 1.05mil & abv, but hardly move unless Qaseh asking price much higher than RM 1.35mil bcz agents told that clients rather try to offer for Qaseh at RM 1.2mil rather than RM 1.05mil for smaller size. |
|
|
Aug 1 2013, 10:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(puchongite @ Aug 1 2013, 10:21 AM) Which means for landed, the land area is an additional important consideration. I think this 22x70 launch is not so well received mainly due to smaller land area. if you are tradisional thinker, min land size for house should be 22x75.There's one smart fellow use 22 x 70 and make it 5 storey terrace in Kuchai lama, that concept didn't received well by the local... But, if we are looking at long term, 20x70 one day will become a standard size, 22x75 will become superlink |
|
|
Aug 16 2013, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(ykt2 @ Aug 16 2013, 09:53 AM) Called up the sales gallery. 4 units left - No. 26, 31, 39 and 41. Not bad sales with over 90% take up rate in 2 weeks (with Raya holiday) considering the high amount of initial commitment of RM50k upfront and remaining 10% within 2 months. Looks like mostly are buying for own stay. you mean 4 intermediate units left right? endlot and corner still available...Also further enquired and they will be launching the shop lots next. The last phase of link houses will be launched next year. |
|
|
Aug 16 2013, 11:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,747 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Malaysia |
QUOTE(ykt2 @ Aug 16 2013, 11:45 AM) Pretty decent sales considering no marketing, advertising, email/sms blasts, discounts, rebates, dibs, schemes....etc thanks for the update. impressed really by the buyers, at this price I always thought G&G link is a better buy...but perhaps underestimate the pull of Kinrara or InP |
| Change to: | 0.0299sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 03:17 AM |