This is true. Absolute pricing is very crucial and critical.
If above applies, smaller size is more liquid esp for highrise. Although, 8 Kinrara proved me wrong due to its smaller size to biggest size also similar at RM 610-670 psf.

But for landed, I think merely based on concept, standard size of living demand, security and few more factors. I believe ppl tend to prefer 22x75 as general and standard living lifestyle and when price hit RM 1mil & above, 24x75, 24x80 and 24x85 are more liquid for them in terms of pricing psf.

Ex. Landed for 22x75, asking price of RM 650-750k moved very well. Landed for 24 x 80, asking price of RM 800-1mil moved very well.

For Bdr Kinrara...
22 x 75 stagnant at RM 1-1.05mil ( RM 411-431 psf ) but
24 x 80 easily can sell at RM 1.2- 1.25mil ( RM 428-446 psf )
Weird ?

Which means for landed, the land area is an additional important consideration. I think this 22x70 launch is not so well received mainly due to smaller land area.

if you are tradisional thinker, min land size for house should be 22x75.

There's one smart fellow use 22 x 70 and make it 5 storey terrace in Kuchai lama, that concept didn't received well by the local...

But, if we are looking at long term, 20x70 one day will become a standard size, 22x75 will become superlink

For me I think it's the other way round.

That is, 22x70 used to be acceptable but now people who can afford to buy landed, they tend to think 22x75 is the minimum.

New buyers who cannot afford 22x75 ( and superlink built up ), they might just go an purchase condo instead of settling down at 22x70.

i reckon 24ft width is the minimum. 22ft is too narrow

Yup yup.

Haha, simply over price. Relli kenot digest how a 22" x 70", such small house without any of the things you listed above and without anything fittings nearing Qaseh, close to SATU JUTA is ridiculous leh.

The major concern is the land size 22x70

Yes, i think for landed property, price included two parts, land cost (included area infrastructure cost) and housing construction cost. So, the bigger land, the more higher price in term PSF. Smaller land and more floor, price more lower.

The other main concern is facing main road and school.

Mutiara and Ara Damansara are golden locations? Please define your interpretation of golden location. 2 entry roads via Persiaran Surian and NKVE only? No MRT/LRT? What is the distance to KL/PJ center? I think the real culprit to too much hype is Mutiara and Ara Damansara (is it really Damansara? Or just tumpang the name?). Bandar Kinrara has been relatively low key all this while.

where is it located? is it next to qaseh??

http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=3.043369...656880&z=15&m=b

Called up the sales gallery. 4 units left - No. 26, 31, 39 and 41. Not bad sales with over 90% take up rate in 2 weeks (with Raya holiday) considering the high amount of initial commitment of RM50k upfront and remaining 10% within 2 months. Looks like mostly are buying for own stay.

Also further enquired and they will be launching the shop lots next. The last phase of link houses will be launched next year.

you mean 4 intermediate units left right? endlot and corner still available...

All are intermediate except 41 which is an endlot.

No, I mean thats all that is left for the project. 4 units including endlots and corner units.

Pretty decent sales considering no marketing, advertising, email/sms blasts, discounts, rebates, dibs, schemes....etc

thanks for the update. impressed really by the buyers, at this price I always thought G&G link is a better buy...but perhaps underestimate the pull of Kinrara or InP

Good news for existing owners @ BK. Prices will surely move up step-by-step