Apparently no..the SA was saying it does not follow the lot no given now..high chances new numbering will be implement (e.g one row even no, another odd)

bump into this thread
i just stay next to bk9

looking to get a landed prop near here
still got any intermediate units left?

Irama 2 got ..but only bumi units available..

wah so fast finish...

bro there are only 61units..40% bumi allocation..the non bumi allocation sold off the launch day..queue for 2 days

WAH



I think Kinrara is really a very hot place now? lrt coming, bukit jalil new pavilion
i can see some houses for sale and they are sold really quick ler

kinrara got good potential..y dont u look at kinrara residence?completed, 2,2.5 n 3 storey if u budget allows u..one drawback its' leasehold..but got clubhouse ..

Unfortunately no, there is no way of finding the house number until its 80% done. so which lot is the best out of all listed above? House budget really need to be under the RM1 Million so that will have limit my choice.

i think it depend on our own liking..the general no-no are like not facing t junction, no number 4 etc..however if u r buying for ownstay its totaly upto u, like do u follow feng shui?

I am looking to buy for own stay. However I would like to buy a house that say in 10-20 years time if I decide to sell, I don't have limitation or problem to sell to non-bumi because of this. I know no.4 and facing T junction is not good. With Plot 4, it is facing junction across the road which is not directly. Is that ok or still count as not good?

I think ok, its not directly opposite..its a lorong, not a road..though there is another thing u have to consider is to make sure u hse wall doesnt face west so it is not exposed to noon/eve sun..other than plot 4 what is ur choice? i think u can consider 55 n 56 also cause it is not a junction if im not mistaken..as irama 1 n 2 are not joined and hence there r no road opposite 55 n 56...

This post has been edited by arvind94: Nov 6 2014, 07:23 PM

Plot 2 also good but worried that it might inherit no 4 number. What is different with facing a lorong or road? from the map, 55 or 56 is similar to facing a small lorong or junction too. plot 2 and 4 front house wall is facing south east.

55 or 56 shouldnt have a lorong opposite as the lorong is coming from irama 1..and irama 1 n 2 are not joined and should have separate fencing(but this better to confirm with SA again)..lorong is the small road...for me the reason i dont want hse opposite t junction is for safety issue( car speeding n lose control straight to hse)..and lorong separated by the playground area so that hse ok with me..for the number prob u can always change it with the majlis perbandaran for few hundred (3A n something like that)..

This post has been edited by arvind94: Nov 6 2014, 08:24 PM

I will check with I&P regarding plot 55 and 56. I know from history even if you change the house number to 3A or 2A still have problem in the future when decided to sell. Is the reason the same for everyone when a house is facing junction is not good because of this ( due to safety, car speeding n lose control straight to house)? Just curious.

The 55 and 56 may face junction.

Here is the Irama 1 junction that connect to Irama 2 acces road

Irama 1 and Irama 2 shall had combine security system in future.. it is better to have common security post at the entry.


Attached thumbnail(s)

Its looks like it can be combined looking at irama's layout..i hope if and when they combine, a better security system will be employed( proper guard house with nice entrance, with cctv and good fencing, not the green ones) but all this can only be done with the residents cooperation as when it is handover to RA everyone need to pay the maintenance fee properly so the system can be upheld

A combined security system sounds good. So plot 55 and 56 is out if this is the case. I wish there are still irama 1 still available for purchase for bumi. All gone like hot cakes.

The map for Irama 1 is very old already... that copy from the previous post.

Should be fully sold.

Irama 1 does not have play ground.

Hence, better joint with irama 2. share facility and ringan the security cost.. hi hi

My personal opinion is irama 2 is better than irama 1..the main reason i say this is the layout itself..this is 22*75 whereas irama 22*70 minimum..(though there are various length)..also the master bedroom is slightly higher than the first floor(got extra steps to the master bedroom)..also if im nt mistaken irama 1 is directly infront of a school..just my 2 cent