My B2 city view RM454psf after disc
Cloud Tree @ Cheras Ver 2, Cloud continue here....
Cloud Tree @ Cheras Ver 2, Cloud continue here....
|
|
Aug 22 2013, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,184 posts Joined: May 2005 |
My B2 city view RM454psf after disc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2013, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,184 posts Joined: May 2005 |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2013, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,184 posts Joined: May 2005 |
keep calm and game's still on.
DIBS was always at the expenses of buyers, which developers had always factored this extra cost into selling price when feasibility is ran. That mean whatever price we agreed to has accounted this DIBS cost to developers. Now it is a matter of how the company want to go about this. It is just more works for the company but not more cost, any sensible developer won't want to reset its committed sales in this situation. |
|
|
Oct 28 2013, 12:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,184 posts Joined: May 2005 |
to be fair, I think the financial modelling including cashflow projection for this project has been fixed and approved by Zalam's BoD. If Zalam is to strictly adhere to its original cashflow plan, periodic interest subsidy/reimbursement seems more realistic.
One-off cash rebate/ discount would mean Zalam has to rework the financials, they are at quite a high gearing to undertake this project. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0343sec
0.29
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 01:37 PM |