Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Four charged for kidnapping Ng Mun Tatt, They may face death penalty
|
hrevijay
|
Jul 22 2013, 04:26 PM
|
Getting Started

|
This sets a very good precedent. It will let the rakyat know that the law enforcement agencies are impartial in the actions. Very good. Now lets go all the way to the death penalty to emphasize the point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hrevijay
|
Jul 22 2013, 06:27 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(dupemaster @ Jul 22 2013, 05:06 PM)  I smell someone being double standard over here. But I agree, these 4 should receive maximum punishment and I hope the same level of liability can be imposed on the "related couple" as well...to emphasize the point and act as future deterrents.  Oh please, don't give me that shit. indians, chinese, malays, i honestly don't give a damn...fry them all for i care. Lets evaluate this situation logically. you ask for maximum punishment for alvivi. really ? that's 15 years. and for what ? publishing a photo online that might have ruffled a few feathers ? If that's how you think, that there is something really wrong with your head. At the most, what they have done is annoy a few people. Community service and maybe, a fine should suffice. On the other hand, this 4 mamats have kidnapped and violently beaten a man. Now if something had gone wrong that night, assuming he tried to jump out of the moving vehicle, he could very easily have died. So what they have done is unforgivable. These monsters most certainly deserve the maximum punishment. Lets not forget the fact that they had extorted money from him before letting him go. That basically is kidnap, assault and armed robbery. Death------ deservingly so ! I rest my case your honor This post has been edited by hrevijay: Jul 22 2013, 06:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
hrevijay
|
Jul 22 2013, 06:46 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(dupemaster @ Jul 22 2013, 06:42 PM) Ruffled a few feather perhaps, but what if something went wrong and instead of just ruffling those feathers, a tension broke out, Who knows right? Worst case scenarios though just assumptions should be treated equally thus both deserve maximum punishments. Wait....why the f*** are you bringing this racial shit? And no plea had been made, and dafuk you're resting your case? Since when a pre-trial statement becomes a fact? Both Alvivi and these boys still have the chance to prove otherwise. Hey asswipe, aren't you the one who b****ed about double standards ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hrevijay
|
Jul 22 2013, 07:04 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(dupemaster @ Jul 22 2013, 06:56 PM) Hey *******, I'm b****ing about the level of liability and out of a sudden you spewed that chinese, malay bla bla idgaf. You sure are one big *******. The IGP stated in his press statement that the kidnapping was related to those two, and the victim stated otherwise. Did the victim lie? Who knows? No idea wtf you're getting at. Anyways, you brought up double standards here. Obviously implying that it was a malay vs chinese thing. So don't me give the bullshit about level of liability. I don't give a fuq about who said what, the fact that they extorted money from the victim very clearly states the motive of the case. and it certainly had nothing to do with the alvivi case, merely a ploy to make their criminal act to be something that it is not. I mean look at the jihadist in the middle east who blow themselves up in the name of religion. Now these people are the ones who are really driven by their beliefs. Now do you see them extorting money from their victims. and chill, no need to get so pissed off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hrevijay
|
Jul 22 2013, 10:31 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(YKayz @ Jul 22 2013, 10:23 PM) In Malaysia, when come to any case so called "related to <insert religion>" will automatically considered similar as physically and mentally hurt to them. If debate about logic with them, they will just shove you that no logic can be applicable when come to "feel insulted to their religion and god". Therefore, Feeling hurt > Physically hurt. Those argument brought by certain ppl in Alvivi case has reminded me about fapping to someone's picture would also consider as physically rape to that particular person whom you fap to. So, all those fappers should treated as rapist criminal and can be sentence to jail with >99999+ strokes. True story. Actually it is fine if the same rules apply to them. Unfortunately that's not the case here.
|
|
|
|
|