Oct 9 2020, 05:31 PM
QUOTE(DesRed @ Oct 9 2020, 01:50 PM)
Saw that article posted in another thread (link, last page). Not surprised it's expected since the demographic of own-stay and investor owners would've stabilised by then since it was completed in 2013, way before Airbnb was prominent in Malaysia.
I'd agree with this ban if the nuisance caused by these guests was really bad until it warrants for one, but the linked article failed to highlight the examples which occurred when those guests are staying at those 4 units. Some readers may take it that a bunch of irate residents living on the same floors as those units could've tailed those guests and pinpointed the units they're staying in, then report it straight to the management.
Personally, I've no issue with whoever is staying in the unit as long as they're civil, be it an owner, guest or tenant.
It’s cumulative effect of many temporary guests over time.I'd agree with this ban if the nuisance caused by these guests was really bad until it warrants for one, but the linked article failed to highlight the examples which occurred when those guests are staying at those 4 units. Some readers may take it that a bunch of irate residents living on the same floors as those units could've tailed those guests and pinpointed the units they're staying in, then report it straight to the management.
Personally, I've no issue with whoever is staying in the unit as long as they're civil, be it an owner, guest or tenant.
Typically when there a lot of airbnb guests, facilities worn out a lot faster as they tend to use facilities to maximise and they are not so gentle on facilities usage as they are not paying maintenance fees. Heard at one time a lot of facilities at setia sky residence are broken.
The lawsuit is to scare off other operators. They are not the only one operating airbnb
This post has been edited by funfunfun: Oct 9 2020, 05:34 PM
Quote
0.0157sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled