Nokia Lumia 1020 - 41MP, 1/1.5" BSI Sensor CZ Lens, Fully MF|Exposure|Shutter Speed|ISO|WB
|
|
 Jul 19 2013, 01:22 PM
|
 
Senior Member
3,045 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Canterlot  
|
QUOTE(chokia @ Jul 19 2013, 01:17 PM) 808 has bigger sensor right? bigger than APS-C. Anxiously waiting for camera review of the 1020. Hopefully they can do a shootout with the 808 as well. then i'll decide want to change or not I wonder how 808 onwers respond to 1020 with a tad smaller sensor but has BSI plus W8 as compared to Symbian   |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 19 2013, 10:57 PM
|
Junior Member
124 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(chokia @ Jul 19 2013, 01:17 PM) 808 has bigger sensor right? bigger than APS-C. bigger than aps-c sensor? err.. i dont think so..I wonder how 808 onwers respond to 1020 with a tad smaller sensor but has BSI plus W8 as compared to Symbian |
|
|
Jul 20 2013, 04:21 AM
|
Senior Member
3,617 posts Joined: Oct 2010
|
QUOTE(shadow_calamity @ Jul 19 2013, 10:57 PM) bigger than aps-c sensor? err.. i dont think so.. LOL i know just kidding, coz CNET's review really gets into me when they said.QUOTE Still, it's hard not to get excited about a modern smartphone powerful enough to replace your point-and-shoot, and possibly even your dSLR. http://reviews.cnet.com/nokia-lumia-1020/ |
|
|
Jul 20 2013, 03:12 PM
|
 
Moderator
12,176 posts Joined: Sep 2009 
|
I hope the pricing can compete with LX 7 range. A good camera come with a decent phone
 |
|
|
Jul 20 2013, 11:20 PM
|
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(chokia @ Jul 19 2013, 01:17 PM) 808 has bigger sensor right? bigger than APS-C. No bro. While the 808 sensor size is 4 times larger than mainstream smartphones, an APS-C sensor is also ~4 times larger than 808 sensor. 808 sensor size is almost as large as Nikon J1/V1 system. To be honest, Nokia is winning this mobile imaging war due to the sensor size and Zeiss optic. However, the software part can be improved; after what I had seen Apple and Samsung had done to their tiny sensors.I wonder how 808 onwers respond to 1020 with a tad smaller sensor but has BSI plus W8 as compared to Symbian I own an 808. The only things that tempted me to switch is the OIS function, shorter focus distance, better dynamic range (on paper), slimmer/lighter profile, and larger screen size with doubled ppi. But all the full reso pics released so far do not look as good as 808 despite all the hype on paper. I can only tell it from my experience with 808; not side-by-side A/B comparison. I think they got the software part wrong. This post has been edited by davidletterboyz: Jul 20 2013, 11:26 PM |
|
|
Jul 20 2013, 11:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,617 posts Joined: Oct 2010
|
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Jul 20 2013, 11:20 PM) No bro. While the 808 sensor size is 4 times larger than mainstream smartphones, an APS-C sensor is also ~4 times larger than 808 sensor. 808 sensor size is almost as large as Nikon J1/V1 system. To be honest, Nokia is winning this mobile imaging war due to the sensor size and Zeiss optic. However, the software part can be improved; after what I had seen Apple and Samsung had done to their tiny sensors. I used to be fan of WM. Flashing custom ROm was like a weekly routine. Do they still doing it for WP8?I own an 808. The only things that tempted me to switch is the OIS function, slimmer/lighter profile, and larger screen size. But so far all the full reso pics released so far do not look as good as 808. I think they got the software part wrong. All these mobile OSes pretty standard without Root, JB and Custom ROM |
|
|
Jul 20 2013, 11:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(chokia @ Jul 20 2013, 11:31 PM) I used to be fan of WM. Flashing custom ROm was like a weekly routine. Do they still doing it for WP8? No idea. I only have a limited experience with WP7.5 and I had sold it to get my 808 lol.All these mobile OSes pretty standard without Root, JB and Custom ROM |
| Change to: |  0.0205sec
 1.03
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th December 2025 - 12:57 AM |
Quote