Hmmm... at least the download link is not broken. But download rate is still slow. 3kB/s!!!
BitComet 0.67
|
|
 May 14 2006, 01:25 PM
|
 
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 02:17 PM
|
 
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
hhmm.. 0.67 just crashed again.. using back 0.60 now
 This post has been edited by goliath: May 14 2006, 02:17 PM |
|
|
May 14 2006, 05:50 PM
|
|
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong
|
Updated to Bitcomet 0.67. So far no crashes. But I noticed something since the last few versions. The chat feature seems broken. No nickname would appear...
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 05:53 PM
|
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Im using Bitcomet version 0.63 . .and its fine .. never crashed on me yet
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 05:55 PM
|
Senior Member
602 posts Joined: Nov 2005 
|
This Bitcomet version 0.67 crashed in my computers few times already..
Now turn back 0.64.....old version better........ |
|
|
May 14 2006, 05:59 PM
|
|
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong
|
Updated to Bitcomet 0.67. So far no crashes. But I noticed something since the last few versions. The chat feature seems broken. No nickname would appear...
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 06:31 PM
|
Senior Member
6,410 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MLK
|
[troll] I can't see why people are still sticking with Bitcomet. [/troll]
*runs*  |
|
|
May 14 2006, 06:47 PM
|
Senior Member
908 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Home
|
QUOTE(hbh60 @ May 14 2006, 05:53 PM) Im using Bitcomet version 0.63 . .and its fine .. never crashed on me yet yep 0.63 works fine will switch to a new v where there are no crashes |
|
|
May 14 2006, 08:13 PM
|
|
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ May 14 2006, 06:31 PM) [troll] I can't see why people are still sticking with Bitcomet. [/troll] Don't know why le... utorrent never worked properly for me even if I've done all setting appropriately. It fails to map an UPnP port for my router. After all, Bitcomet is more aggresive and it picks up speed much quicker than any other client.*runs* |
|
|
May 17 2006, 04:46 PM
|
|
Staff
10,459 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Puchong
|
No no no... Bitcomet 0.67 is not for me. It crashed terribly when it hash checks when a task has finished. My computer turned super irresponsive and has 100% CPU usage. Ending Bitcomet takes a long time. I can't use the computer until bitcomet has been terminated. Reverting to previous version.
 This post has been edited by mengsuan: May 17 2006, 04:47 PM |
|
|
May 17 2006, 04:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
yea.. i revert back to 0.63 already..
|
|
|
May 17 2006, 07:49 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ May 14 2006, 06:31 PM) [troll] I can't see why people are still sticking with Bitcomet. [/troll] Which client are you recommending then?*runs* |
|
|
May 17 2006, 07:53 PM
|
Senior Member
1,648 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ, Malaysia
|
I've been using BitComet all this while. The only other BT client i ever used was the original BitTorrent client when it was first released...lol.
However, few days back I tried Azureus and I enjoy thier stability and response. No more bitcomet for me, Azureus all da way man. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 17 2006, 11:37 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Azureus requires Java Runtime Environment plugin. Lazy to install that ...
|
|
|
May 18 2006, 09:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
542 posts Joined: Oct 2004
|
running for 3 days crashed once, what a disappointed version again.
|
|
|
May 18 2006, 09:27 AM
|
|
Senior Member
5,533 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(David83 @ May 17 2006, 07:49 PM) Which client are you recommending then? i guess it is μtorrentQUOTE(brinkc @ May 18 2006, 09:22 AM) running for 3 days crashed once, what a disappointed version again. change back to 0.63. that's what i did and i am happy with it |
|
|
May 18 2006, 07:18 PM
|
Senior Member
910 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
anyway shd i upgrade my 0.60?
|
|
|
May 18 2006, 08:02 PM
|
|
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ksking @ May 18 2006, 07:18 PM) anyway shd i upgrade my 0.60? I don't think it's a necessary. It works perfectly with me. |
|
|
May 18 2006, 08:10 PM
|
Senior Member
3,169 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(ksking @ May 18 2006, 07:18 PM) anyway shd i upgrade my 0.60? you should upgrade to 0.63, it has some improvement over .60. |
|
|
May 18 2006, 09:43 PM
|
Senior Member
7,284 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Hong Kong / Malaysia  
|
Sticking back with 0.63 and no problem with it
 ...Try google around and u will managed to find the installer  |
| Change to: |  0.0172sec
 0.88
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 08:54 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.