Can you post the picture of the metal badge?

Okay, I looked through their site, I've seen the vids... but I still don't get the gist of this game.

Is it a standalone thing like C&C with multiplayer function? Or like Battlefield where you do battle online and rank up with some sort of internal system?

If its just something like C&C I'd won't be spending my wallet on this one -.- Its RM149 no less!

who wants to play supreme commander tonite? Who has got the games and can play smoothly?

Is the 3D aerial dogfights of Total Annihilation retained in SupCom? Haven't played any RTS which require skilled mouse-command air combat since TA 

Miss those days, massive aerial skirmishes on multiplayer just for the fun of it.

on my current pc, they hesitate to move... after waiting 2-3 secs, they decide to move, slowly...

number of units: 150.

main cause: dust trails each unit make when moving.

In the SupCom 1v1 tourney.. pro player can end a game around 12mins more or less.

---

Added on March 29, 2007, 9:35 am

SS2, Clutch Gamer has GRAW.. even the above specs cannot coupe 4v4 full scare of war where by thousands of units raging war at the same time at land, see and air

I cant promise they still have the game installed.. i play it long long time ago. GRAW multiplayer COOP sux.. it keep crash to desktop after a while

You are talking bout all the experimental units but what about normal t1 units?

FYI, the Supcom tourney hosted by Gamespot.com last time.

- Average time for 1 match in preliminary ~30mins
- Average time for 1 match in quarter, semi-final, and final ~ 15mins

they are all 1v1 matches.

wtf they play so fast?
Bring your commander along when u fight. Not to hide them under water like (Doh, Girl style)

micro ur commander well and gg

---

Added on April 10, 2007, 5:50 pm

You want some well-balanced game?? this is it.

LoL yeah ballanced indeed.

Yeah even  on GPG net a standard 1 v 1 is 15 minbut for a closely matched game prolly 30 min, I think the speeds are prety decent for an RTS.
prolly the diff btwn AEON and UEF is that its shells are slower but more deadly since the slow plasmas are slow. Well Cybran they are just huge starwars fan.

I think youve not played Naval for AEON check this out .
http://www.supcomsource.net/content.php?pa...20Naval%20Units

did you guys realize that Cybran's T1 Heavy Assault could help repair / build? this is good for expansion, your military units work just as good as T1 engineers. 

as for T4 units, i'd say the scariest T4 units would be the Cybran artillery unit. if you're not on a big map, just build a unit or 2 of these and see the enemy base go bye-bye.

another creepy unit is T4 Colosssus for Aeon. 240k HP. damn.

Cybrans can't shoot through walls? can la. i play Cybran, i always build walls in front of my guns. no problem what.

the thing i hate about SC is that they have some issues when a unit is in the water.

for example colossus. if it's half in the water, your torpedo bombers can't touch it too.

fatboy? if it's in the water, some how i can't hit it / damage it either.

it's been a while since i played multiplayer, but i know i face this problem when defending friends against T4 units. some units just refuse to hit despite part of the T4 unit is submerged blablablabla.
even the Colossus that has about 4x more HP than ML also dies easily. however UEF T3 gunships can't hit Czar.

ok what. not like it matters.

once you have soooooooo many T3 generators. it just shoots, to me it's no big deal.

the fact that it's inaccurate makes it so deadly with it's rapid fire.

imagine how much ground it covers. it's literally raining hailstones from hell on enemy base.
oh like that. yeah.
tried i'm aware of those shields, and i have many bombers. fatboy's shields aren't that tough and when submerged they can't even shoot.

impossible those shields last that long.
ok. i'm actually referring to torpedo bombers, the one that hits underwater unit.

the colossus even at half-submerged SHOULD be susceptible to hits from torps from subs or torp-bomber but nooooooo it doesn't. despite being half-submerged, you can only hit it with non-submerged weapons.
weak? no way man, that bugger is damn tough to kill even with ground units unless you have a bunch of T3 units.

ML has like 65k armor and it's damn annoying when you have
1 no base defences - point defence or units, it'll take that down easily)
2 no air units (it takes down air units easily too unless you're using a bunch of gunships.

there's 1 game where my base was safely tucked somewhere, the ML some how slipped passed my buddy (i don't know how he didn't manage to spot that ML, non-cloaked) and that fella tore my base apart.

btw fatboy has far less armor than the ML. fatboy's armor is about 25k i think. it has shield and long range weapon advantage. cool AA too. just that a bunch of T3 strat bombers would wipe it out easily.

stupid? well they certainly can give a few surprises.

i've seen people being taken down by AIs.

on the other hand i've tested the AI and it seems that the more time you give them, they'll sometimes be overwhelmingly strong.

and yeah, T3 Nuke Missile will not work on AI. in fact it won't work on anyone as long as there's T3 missile defence.

the only way to advantage is to get the T3 missile first, if not then it's a real waste.

Does anyone know if this game is installed in any of the CCs in KL?

@toughnut,
A single core can run this game well?How you do it?Teach me please without OC-ing my AMD 3200+.Which patch did you apply?Is the official GPG's patch?

It was laggy as hell in demo and thats the reason i drop this game.