Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Oil & Gas Careers v5, Upstream and Downstream

views
     
ch_teo
post Jan 31 2014, 01:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(meonkutu11 @ Jan 29 2014, 10:27 PM)
Guys, Otai2,
I just want to throw some questions that had been in my mind for quite sometimes. It is about so called ‘nationalization’ or maybe some kind of force from our NOC in order to make sure the foreign companies, drilling contractors must have percentage of local employees or at least has one or two local engineers in the contractors office.
First of all, I’m talking more on the Drilling Contractors (Transocean, Seadrill, Ensco, Nabors, Maersk etc). I read in the General Guidelines – Application For Petronas License and Registration about the equity should bumiputera holds in order to register the company and bidding the drilling contracts with Petronas but I did not see the audits had been performed to make sure it really comply with the requirements (at least I didn’t experience it).
Also if we are talking about the rig crews on the drilling rigs. The general labors (Assist Driller and below) normally come from manpower supply which most of them are locals. I’m more concerned about KEY EMPLOYEES (Drillers, Toolpushers, Barge Masters, OIMs etc) which hardly seen our locals on that spot. Ok, maybe not all rigs have all the expat key employees. But if you see some of the drilling contractors which operating in Malaysia for 5 or 10 years but still not many KEY EMPLOYEES onboard, it will trigger you something like why no Malaysian Rig Managers, OIMs, Toolpushers or Drillers? Is it because of Malaysian are not qualified, don’t know how to run the drilling rigs? Or there is no much force from the Client to develop more locals? Or we are not confident with our local talents?
I know some of the clients stated in their contracts that the contractor must has one local engineer in the contractor office which I think one of their approached for them to develop the local talent. But then again, there is no clause in the contract for such and such years they need to have such and such percentage of local crews onboard. I don’t know why.
Now with the new local player in the drilling such as UMWSD, Perisai, Kencana I believe there will be more local talents can be developed and hopefully there is some mechanism to make sure that they are also really develop the local and not hire some expats to run the Malaysian Flag Drilling Rigs.
I’m sure otai2 in our NOC or X-NOC have the information on this matter or maybe already in place but I didn’t aware. After all, it is our NOC and I’m sure one of their agenda is developing local talents.
*
i assisted my ex-GM in renewing the license for our m'sia 3 plants years ago. the thing is that sometimes, getting the correct person with correct qualifications and experience is difficult. if get fresh, require some time to train, maybe months, maybe years. sometimes, the responsibilities require just plug-and-play which customers require qualified and experience personnels only in tenders within such a short period of time.

as for Bumi, last year, i was rejected for a post based in KL as 1 of the requirements was this when communicating with a UK recruiter. so local talents?
not intend to cause anything about this but that is the true fact. so instead of go for those big names operators/contractors/consultants, sometimes, certain MNC underdogs which serve those big names will pay better and rewarding more diverse experience. so sometimes, the big names with new people fresh experience in o&g just know zero thing about practicality and only as pen-pusher or talk-demand this that.

as for expat in some MNC companies, some of them may play the "politics" pushing to their vendors in order to extend their contracts...

This post has been edited by ch_teo: Jan 31 2014, 01:34 PM
ch_teo
post Jan 31 2014, 01:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(vult2res @ Jan 27 2014, 11:55 AM)
thanks for the heads up. do you mind to share how do you get all the professional certs? cost is not an issue as i see education/certs are more important to gain.
*
around 6 years ago, i applied through Management Trainee (MT), 2-year and at the end can join 1 of their business units, subject to the mentor evaluation. there was 1000 plus applicants that time.
the company get the recruitment consultant which also involve in Shell recruitment to help them to source the MT.

went through 5 stages of tests, group-test and interviews for around 6 months by stages. at the end, they selected only 7 MT inclusive me. but i was offered project engineer post instead of MT due to i have 3 years experience technically in consultant. they offered me to select 1 of their 3 business units. at the end, i ended here as at today in OCTG from based in KL office then to based in Singapore office now. my first 2 years, i was hardly in the KL office as was rotated from 1 location of plant to another location within our 10 plants. sometimes, spent months at there, sometimes, weeks. sometimes, just 1 week.

again, if you have the heart to join o&g, pls to find out yourself those certs and how to proceed.

This post has been edited by ch_teo: Jan 31 2014, 01:46 PM
ch_teo
post Feb 7 2014, 09:05 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
"For Internal Use Only"

Pls be careful of what one's posting in public forum.
ch_teo
post Feb 11 2014, 07:14 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(BillySteel @ Feb 11 2014, 02:33 AM)
CSWIP 3.1 might not take you in as you do not have the experience. Go for 3.0 work 2 years than apply for 3.1.

I dont think without NDT experience you can be a free-lancer unless you know people. Apply for permanent first. Best to take MPI as carbon steel is the most commonly used material in the O&G industry.

For welding cert CSWIP is more reputable and for NDT PCN certs are the most reputable.

Try puspatri or something they have those free courses...

try to get job as technician or work under those mill-wrights or start off as a roughneck/helper is another possibility.
*
Agreed on CSWIP 3.1, one can apply for the course (there are pre-requisites) but may not be approved by the body if without proper and adequate qualifications and experience.
recently, there are more & more NDT companies set-up but in order to sustain in the market in term of longer period?

inconel and chrome materials at critical areas of subsea equipments is the way to the future, can refer to API 5CRA on types of NDT to be performed on chrome materials. there is a potential of higher PI reserve if there is higher CO2 but higher challenges during drilling and there come the inconel and chrome playing their parts in casing/tubing. MPI may not be suitable for inconel and chrome, subject to ASTM and customer's requirements.

This post has been edited by ch_teo: Feb 11 2014, 07:17 AM
ch_teo
post Feb 11 2014, 07:20 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(exofx @ Feb 7 2014, 05:41 PM)
everyone think work at offshore is best..
but why not think about your risk brows.gif
*
agreed. it is really subject to the risks and the remunerations compensations.
sometimes, certain jobs in office can be well paid than offshore and vice versa.
ch_teo
post Mar 3 2014, 11:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(budak minyak @ Feb 28 2014, 03:09 PM)
Here comes the situation,

This morning, I got a call from UMW oil and gas, and they offered me to work as trainee drilling engineer. The pay is lower than my current salary, basic rm2700/month and Im gonna need to sign contract with them for 2 years. I forgot to ask about the offshore allowance, but I heard UMW only pay rm100/day for offshore allowance.

At the first place Im not interested since thinking the offer is lower than my current salary. But during the lunch I talked with my colleagues engineers  who got more experience than me, they advise me to take the offer since I can learn a lot at UMW and the drilling job got huge and great prospect in the future.

So I wanna ask opinion from u guys, should I stay in my current company, or go UMW? Please help.
*
current MPD in Asia-Pacific, coming soon maybe more & more.

MPD --> PMCD

This post has been edited by ch_teo: Mar 3 2014, 11:07 PM
ch_teo
post Mar 19 2014, 12:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(WildChai @ Mar 16 2014, 12:43 AM)
Anyone from the service side jump over to the client?
*
since the last few years, have been offered from a few clients but not interested as they are not a bed of roses sometimes.
ch_teo
post Mar 19 2014, 12:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
809 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
QUOTE(abgkik @ Mar 18 2014, 09:39 AM)
Bro.. as for me, bonus is not my priority.. Bonus is bonus, chance to get it 50/50.. I always look into the basic salary, tax free package etc.. When you have proven specific skill and experience, your salary will be awesome.. wink.gif
Not bad bro.. Time management at Client is better, less stress  thumbup.gif
*
it is true. have been getting annual increment 6.x% + 13th month bonus + average 3.5 months bonus since the last few years. this year get promoted increment 20%.

the thing is that does not necessary join o&g. look at one's skills and experience and adjust to the jobs to prove.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0216sec    0.60    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 04:22 AM