KLCI is just like the haze outside....hazardous.
STOCK MARKET DISCUSSION V132, Everyone Huat!
STOCK MARKET DISCUSSION V132, Everyone Huat!
|
|
Jun 24 2013, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
KLCI is just like the haze outside....hazardous.
|
|
|
Jun 25 2013, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jun 24 2013, 09:48 PM) Deleveraging and deflation in worth means money varnish in thin air, as same as the opposite of money created in thin air. For stock price to move, a transaction has to have taken placeYield is getting higher, so those extra cash can buy those higher yield asset. Remember when a bond being sold down (that resulted yield getting higher), there is still a buyer and a seller. Money is not always constant, aka if there is 1 million, then the 1 million must be somewhere. It doesn't. A simple scenario, if stock market plunging, resulted value become lesser, then where is the money goes? It varnish. Nobody is winner, everyone losing money. So 100 million worth become 50 million, where is the 50 million, gone with thin air. While in bullish market, everyone is making money, who is loser? No one. Money become more and more. Stock market is never a zero sum game. Only futures market is. So if u buy at $1 and then tmw the price flew to $1.5 ... the person who sold is $0.5 richer ma. Inversely the person who bought is $1.5 'poorer in cash' Dun forget when u want to buy something more expensive u need to bring additional money into the game .... in this case $0.5 more Inversely when stock mkt drop scenario Say u have this stock for $1 Suddenly drop to $0.8 .... if u dun sell then u dun lose ma .... If u sell then only u lose $0.2 And dun forget in stock market its paper gain and paper loss ..... no cash is transacted until u actually buy or sell the money cant just disappear no where right? I guess you mean value instead? that can disappear as it is non tangible. do correct me if i am wrong. |
|
|
Jun 25 2013, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Apr 2013 |
QUOTE(yhtan @ Jun 25 2013, 10:38 AM) Padini going face tough time from its competitor. H&M apparel is appealing to ladies, i always see full on or off sales during weekend. Uniqlo apparel on the other hand, some of it not so suitable for local weather. true, but some how the new brands diluted the market share and consumer spending power, no more eating the big piece of the pie.I doubt there will be significant incremental demand with new brands, as consumers have a budget to spend on with each category. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0489sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 02:56 PM |