Goodness, at least he made the effort to be helpful.

Besides, who are you to comment on the state of his "English writing"?
Your own attempts at articulation don't exactly look like excerpts from The Economist Style Guide!

Such arrogance, and for no good reason.

Fair enough, but the criticism lacked any substance whatsoever.
(Hey, shoot me if I don't think calling someone's work "boring" is particularly enlightening or constructive.)
It was all about how bad nuttyking91's writing skills were, even though he obviously spent a lot of time and effort enthusiastically putting together a review he felt would be helpful.

Completely ironic, considering the standard of English offered up by the one posting the critique.

Apologies, I meant jlol and not nuttyking91.

You DO realise that every time you fumble out yet another error-riddled post displaying your own feeble grasp of the English language, that you're embarassing yourself, don't you?

Probably not. You clearly display a lack of any ability to recognise irony.