Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Fundsupermart.com v3, Manage your own unit trust portfolio
|
TakoC
|
May 30 2013, 11:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ May 30 2013, 11:12 PM) Because I also hold some stocks directly, so I don't want to have a Malaysia equity fund. Even without a Malaysia equity fund in my UT portfolio, Malaysia exposure in my UT portfolio is already close to 10% of my total equity exposure. If consolidate my UT + direct stockholding, my Malaysia equity exposure would be way more than 50% already, still want a Malaysia equity fund?  Not bad lar. Still better than me. 100% equity in small caps. If collapse sure die. Need diverse already
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 1 2013, 09:46 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 1 2013, 08:39 AM) Any new promotion coming again? Hehe... Yes. 2% SC a lot lar. Hahaha .. PGSF -1%. C'mon .. Green already .. Zzz
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 1 2013, 11:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(JinXXX @ Jun 1 2013, 11:00 AM) weird my PGSF seems to be in the "green" and profiting...  wahhahahaahha Soon soon bro. Another week to green side hopefully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 2 2013, 01:12 AM
|
|
QUOTE(aoisky @ Jun 2 2013, 12:48 AM) Well. It may be the best in it's league but it's definitely not in overall. Yes it outperform its benchmark but there are a lot other funds which is outperform GEM fund. in term of IRR this fund among the lower rank in my overall portfolio. We buy UT, one common objective good return isn't it ? Pink will tell you that diversification. But somehow I agree with you. Even if fund A returns and market is not as attractive as fund B (and fund A exposure is not yet in my portfolio). I won't buy it if I know Fund B will perform better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 2 2013, 05:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(aoisky @ Jun 2 2013, 10:03 AM) Well said diversification, UT itself already diversified your investment. Diversification your fund allocation is a good practice but sometimes too diversified may not yield good return. I hope I don't piss all the sifu off here by saying this. But having a too diversified portfolio is not a good thing sometimes. I believe I have a higher portfolio yield than some of the sifu here who have a wide diversification. But of course, once the market hits me. It'll hit hard. I have got a taste of the 'poison' yet. So diversation is syill the way to go lar. Decision is HOW diversify.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 3 2013, 10:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 3 2013, 09:59 PM) Sorry? Did I miss something? Today or to date? Btw -9% in March to +0.9% now why jialat? Thought its a good thing? /blurface
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 3 2013, 10:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(David83 @ Jun 3 2013, 10:02 PM) My portfolio as of end of May 2013 [attachmentid=3469774] Fund | ROI | IRR Public South East Asia Select Fund | 41.20 | 7.26 CIMB-Principal Australian Equity Fund | 24.42 | 14.19 Public Far East Select Fund | 22.57 | 3.01 AmAP REITs | 7.91 | 9.66 Public Asia Ittikal Fund | 8.87 | 1.46 AmDynamic Bond | 6.61 | 5.42 Aberdeen Islamic World Equity Fund - Class A | 3.07 | 8.37 CIMB-Principal Asia Pacific Dynamic Income Fund | 1.71 | 11.53 OSK-UOB EMB | 0.05 | 0.06 How long have you been holding your first three funds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 3 2013, 10:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 3 2013, 10:05 PM) Cannot remember yours bro.. but my max ROI for this fund was 9.2% Good time for you to buy in more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 3 2013, 10:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 3 2013, 10:11 PM) IRR is useful to compare and benchmark. If you've been investing in a fund for >3 years already and its IRR still couldn't even beat 12-months FD, you might as well dump it. ROI is not useful as a comparison measure. I believe both have their use. I wouldn't say ROI is completely useless. That's why I ask how long has he been holding the fund. This post has been edited by TakoC: Jun 3 2013, 10:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 3 2013, 10:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 3 2013, 10:22 PM) ROI will be good for funds holding less than a year. Also for sales guys to sell the fund.. Hehe Not sure if Pink agree with me on this, but I believe IRR is not suitable to compare funds of different duration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 4 2013, 09:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 4 2013, 09:19 PM) You know you can't wait 1-2 weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:01 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 5 2013, 10:00 AM) Bro.. we need to target higher than FD lei. Min also need to beat EPF la... Haven't beated it yet meh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 5 2013, 10:22 AM) Already beat EPF.. but not enough, hehe.. since there will be volatility or corrections, so need higher than EPF lagi to cushion the unexpected drop! I'm planning to invest in a fund for my sister. She's been keeping it in her bank account earning dust. KidSave, what do you guys think. Don't dare to take too much risk with her money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:36 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 5 2013, 10:27 AM) Boss, Hwang Select Income Fund makes distributions usually twice a year which will bring NAV price down. Don't look at NAV price lar, it does not mean much. Hwang Select Income Fund lower risk than KidSave  Ya. But I figure balance fund. If one side hit, it won't be that bad I guess. Past performance not bad too. I know, I know.. past performance not indicator of future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:36 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Jun 5 2013, 10:36 AM) Ya.. Kidsave is good. Just dont do lump sum, unless she says she will not need the money for 5 years, then I will consider lump sum. Better than earning dust less than 1% right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:46 AM
|
|
HSIF doesn't seem to display their annualized return.
KidSave: 18.11 4.26 13.87 27.25 -13.69 (2012 - 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
Found it through yklooi Fund Selector.
Managing your family's money is always more stressful than your own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 5 2013, 10:52 AM) Tarak lar. Usually is under Other Performance Data column one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 10:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 5 2013, 10:53 AM) FUND PERFORMANCE (BID-TO-BID ANNUALIZED RETURNS) near bottom of the page 1 year 2 year 3 year 5 year 11.1 8.6 10.4 9.4 So 2012 it's 11.1, 2011 is calculated as 11.1 - 8.6 = 2%+? I believe not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TakoC
|
Jun 5 2013, 11:09 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jun 5 2013, 11:01 AM) U understand the concept of ANNUALISED RETURN or not?  Means from 03-Jun-12 to 03-Jun-13: +11.1% from 03-Jun-11 to 03-Jun-13: +8.6% PER ANNUM from 03-Jun-10 to 03-Jun-13: +10.4% PER ANNUM Cause I usually look at OTHER PERFORMANCE DATA, bro. Hwang Select Asia (ex Japan) Quantum Fund (%) 27.42 6.17 27.74 62.04 -27.11 (2012 - 2008)
|
|
|
|
|