Anybody use BullGuard?
Internet Security Suites
Internet Security Suites
|
|
Nov 26 2008, 04:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
Anybody use BullGuard?
|
|
|
Oct 1 2010, 09:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
SuperAntiSpyware Free Edition is good for 2nd layer of protection. It doesn't meant to be used as primary Internet Security or Anti-Virus but they are compatible with most of Internet/AV suites.
|
|
|
Dec 31 2013, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
Some 'revelation' about Matousec comparative test:
QUOTE originally Posted by EMSISOFT QUOTE Quote: Originally Posted by andyman35 Matousec and Tall emu had a dispute over money,Emsisoft now own the relevant part of Tall Emu,Matousec (quite wrongly) is taking the dispute to Emsisoft. Wrong. Emsisoft does not own parts of Tall Emu, Emsisoft has bought the intellectual property of the Online Armor product from Tall Emu. Well, that little difference is reason for all the conflict we've got. Matousec denies the fact that Tall Emu no longer owns Online Armor and is still asking for money for it. David Matousek thinks that "Online Armor" owes him money and therefore Emsisoft has to pay for it now. Which is quite nonsense because a product can't owe anybody money, only the maker of the product can. That's like me saying your toothbrush owes me $10... I've clearly stated that Emsisoft will not continue to finance that crazy testing system and as a result, Online Armor was delisted, even if the earlier tests have been paid by Tall Emu correctly. Currently, the vendor paying the biggest money stays on top of the ranking. Why? Every re-test costs money and the tests of all products are not performed at the same time. So it ends up in a battle of vendors paying for retests everytime a new test component is added. If you don't pay again, your product is ranked lower because there's another one paying to get the top score. Sorry, I can't support that. In my opinion that's a rip-off. http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.ph...63&postcount=30 QUOTE Tests ARE important for marketing. That's the main reason for vendors to support testing organizations. Each vendors needs those "best in test" stamps on the products to convince customers to buy. Online Armor was always a top ranked product on the Matousec website, so there was no reason to not-use the test results for marketing. And in early days, the Matousec tests seemed to have a minimum of quality. Except the complete failure to include a behavior blocker product like Mamutu in the firewall tests. However, Matousec tests are no longer valuable for users now and therefore we'll remove all references to them from our websites. The mentioned banner has already gone. Thanks for letting me know. http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.ph...29&postcount=39 One of a few negativity that I heard about Matousec from AV / AM developers. Maybe this is the reality of all comparative test in general. That's why I urge people to stop paying too much attention to figures, scores, ratings etc. Just use whatever that you trust and suit you most. This post has been edited by Angel of Deth: Dec 31 2013, 11:06 AM |
| Change to: | 0.0125sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 12:06 PM |