Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Biostar Tforce 6100 Overclocking Discussion, Biostar Tforce 6100 modded bios inside!

views
     
Cyclone87
post Apr 28 2006, 01:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(shadow_dweller @ Apr 28 2006, 06:43 AM)
I've just got myself a biostar tforce 6100 s754 tis afternoon. anyone wanna share their overclocking experience with this motherboard ?

i was a dfi and epox user and now moving to biostar the setting looks kinda confusing to me. using similar setting on my epox doesn;t work with this motherboard at all. neither does using the setting on my dfi lanparty works on this motherboard too. so any suggestion on ram timing and what to change and what not to change on the bios ?

currently priming at 2200Mhz.

[attachmentid=104530]

biostar tforce 6100 s754 user
1. shadow_dweller - Newcastle 3000+ @ 220*10 = 2200Mhz @ 220Mhz 2.5-4-4-8 2T
2. StupidGuyPlayComp - Sempron 2800+ @ 370*8 = 2965Mhz 
3.

biostar tforce 6100 s939 user
1. nakata101 - Venice 3200+ @ 270*10 = 2700MHz @ 225Mhz 2.5-3-3-7 2T
2.
3.

compatibility issue with other hardware.
1. unable to be fitted with gecube x800gto. gpu dvi connector is blocked by a capacitor in the motherboard.
*
I believe you cant easily go above 2.5ghz on if you on air with Newcastle core. It the last core i gonna get in S754.
From the Top to Bottom - Venice > Clawhammer > Newcastle.
Newcastle is hardly overclock compare to Venice and clawhammer. doh.gif
Cyclone87
post Apr 28 2006, 02:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




Run at 5.5x multiplier..and hit 400HTT. tongue.gif
Cyclone87
post Apr 29 2006, 01:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(thefryingfox @ Apr 29 2006, 09:01 AM)
somehow the nforce 2 platform oces better.
i cant get my rams to be stable even at 217 fsb at 2-3-3-7@1t with 2.85 volts. ( ch-6)
something is quite wrong here. as i usually can do 2-3-3-11 with CPC on ( equivelant to 1t) at 220 fsb cry.gif
*
Btw..it stable Quite High for Winbond CH6 already to stable at 2.85v for 217mhz.
My previous BH5 from Xteem only reach 215mhz at 2.9v for CL2.0. Samo it BH5. Your CH6..can consider gem since it CH series which actually need more Voltage compare to BH series at the same clock.BH5/6 will need around 2.85v also for a good 1 to hit 217mhz.
Cyclone87
post May 1 2006, 02:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(kulus @ May 1 2006, 01:46 PM)
yeahh..u are right mate..in amd64, higher Mhz dont giv high performance like socket a platform.in amd64, higher clock speed mean faster  thumbup.gif
*
Bro..Higher Mhz=Higher Clock Speed.
I Guess you mean Higher HTT dont give extra performence unlike socketA. It not called Mhz.
Cyclone87
post May 2 2006, 05:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




For 939..if u run the onboard GPU with TCCD at DDR600 Dual..i bet it break 4k 3dmark2003.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0766sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:09 PM