Hey guys. want to ask you guys a question. Is the sensor spoil ? This is taken using Canon 60D. Shutter count less than 20k. Sorry is facebook link. Urgent ya. =)
If its sensor spoil, how much estimated to change sensor..? LOL.. Asking on behalf of my friend.
Hi, good day. Want to ask all the pros here. Is it ok to buy Canon 17-55 14 Month old price at 2k? Not sure how much the used price for this right now. And what other thing i need to look for, before pay?
Hi, good day. Want to ask all the pros here. Is it ok to buy Canon 17-55 14 Month old price at 2k? Not sure how much the used price for this right now. And what other thing i need to look for, before pay?
Thanks.
having the same question here, different lenses though.
i think this video helps about things to notice.
This post has been edited by mingyuyu: Sep 15 2013, 10:26 PM
Hi, good day. Want to ask all the pros here. Is it ok to buy Canon 17-55 14 Month old price at 2k? Not sure how much the used price for this right now. And what other thing i need to look for, before pay?
Thanks.
Wow, rm2k is definifely cheap bro if it stil in good condition , I get mine slightly higher than that with perfect, scratchless, dustless condition with complete box
Yeah, will be in China (Beijing, Shanghai and Hangzhou) for a week on 17th to 24th October. For leisure, just decided over the weekend and will buy tickets after speak to my boss on my leave plan. I have plenty to clear.
Finally photography time and it is going to be exciting because I will travel alone most of the time and my colleagues will join and guide me on and off.
slow la. you use USM lenses then you'l realize it's slow but not terribly slow la but still slow lor.
should be RM 2k or less i suppose, especially if used unit. This lens no demand but IQ wise pretty good if I'm not mistaken, good for portraiture.
yeah, I used USM and HSM before, actually if don't shoot sports or any quick moving subjects, the tammy is really good.
I got it around 1.5k, it's brand new unit from HK, the seller sells so cheap because he is urgent for money. IQ is quite good, I think it is even sharper than the first generation of canon 70-200 f2.8 USM L. the colors and bokeh from it are quite lovely.
color wise ok wan la Tamron lens. I also think this lens is just fine if you want f2.8 and not shooting action and such.
damn funny when portrait shooters die die want fps on the body and super fast lens AF speed.
haha IQ wise it is really quite good, even win Sigma in sharpness, but the sigma without OS is so rare, let alone the focusing issues. At least the Tamron is slower but accurate.
haha, I very seldom shoot sports, too many photos needed to process afterwards actually outdoor sports even my 18-135 can handle quite well, tried shooting football and basketball with it before, just that you need to tap the shutter button frequently to chase the subject.
yeah, I used USM and HSM before, actually if don't shoot sports or any quick moving subjects, the tammy is really good.
I got it around 1.5k, it's brand new unit from HK, the seller sells so cheap because he is urgent for money. IQ is quite good, I think it is even sharper than the first generation of canon 70-200 f2.8 USM L. the colors and bokeh from it are quite lovely.
QUOTE(goldfries @ Sep 16 2013, 04:38 PM)
color wise ok wan la Tamron lens. I also think this lens is just fine if you want f2.8 and not shooting action and such.
damn funny when portrait shooters die die want fps on the body and super fast lens AF speed.
like goldie said,
if ur not shooting sports then its okay la. i tried a fren of mine's copy, quite good oso. but not really that tack sharp @ f2.8. but still okay la cuz u got it cheap haha.
i bought a beat up 70-200 is 2.8 sometime ago, and sold it because im not used to zooms (infact im bad at it). not sure which focal to use n stuff. lol. newbie ma..cut me some slack ok?
I once thought of buying it as well. It's cheap and has good IQ.
yeah, it's no brainer not to get it at such good price, most importantly it is brand new.
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Sep 16 2013, 05:02 PM)
like goldie said,
if ur not shooting sports then its okay la. i tried a fren of mine's copy, quite good oso. but not really that tack sharp @ f2.8. but still okay la cuz u got it cheap haha.
i bought a beat up 70-200 is 2.8 sometime ago, and sold it because im not used to zooms (infact im bad at it). not sure which focal to use n stuff. lol. newbie ma..cut me some slack ok?
haha..the last sentence is correct. lol-ed
i think i will use this lens at 200mm f2.8 most of the time always like to use the zoom end and the widest aperture of a lens. (too addicted to bokeh)