gonna check it out.
Bitcomet 0.66, Updated!!!!
|
|
 Apr 28 2006, 02:00 AM
|
 
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: Dec 2004  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 03:39 PM
|
All Stars
11,927 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL / PJ 
|
ehm... >.<"
tis 0.66 also had quite a similar problem wif 0.65 it crashes too.. but not tat often |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 03:57 PM
|
Junior Member
47 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
same as 0.65 ... a lot of crashing too for this version
 |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 05:31 PM
|
Senior Member
646 posts Joined: Dec 2004
|
walau..i've just only installed 0.64..kinda shocks me when saw this thread stating that 0.66 is out..
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 05:40 PM
|
All Stars
17,053 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
0.64 works fine for me and its blazing fast.... anyone here use 0.66? got any improvement?
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 05:43 PM
|
 
Moderator
10,308 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(moon* @ Apr 28 2006, 03:39 PM) ehm... >.<" tis 0.66 also had quite a similar problem wif 0.65 it crashes too.. but not tat often  QUOTE(hetfield85 @ Apr 28 2006, 03:57 PM) same as 0.65 ... a lot of crashing too for this version please do remember to submit the report so that the developer of Bitcomet can analyze the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 06:12 PM
|
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
im using bitcomet 0.6... issit ok? or shud i upgrade to newer for faster dl...
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 06:26 PM
|
Senior Member
1,474 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Moon 
|
well......i wont upgrade to 0.66 as some of u says this version sometimes will crash.....now i stick with 0.63....
 |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 06:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
QUOTE(jon89 @ Apr 28 2006, 06:26 PM) well......i wont upgrade to 0.66 as some of u says this version sometimes will crash.....now i stick with 0.63.... is 0.63 good? currently my dl onli 3-5... i jus go to bitcomet website and they said something ab half open connection... shud i use that patch?QUOTE One of these so called enhancements limits the number of simultaneous incomplete outbound TCP connection attempts ('half-open connections') per second to 10. This is supposed to slow down certain viruses because their spreading strategy is to try to connect to a high amount of random IP numbers. While this limit will slow down viruses, it will also slow P2P (peer-to-peer) applications that establish lots of connections over a short period of time. BitComet is one such application. When the half-open connection limit is reached, new connections will be queued until some of the current connections are established. The 10 half-open connection limit applies to Windows, not just BitComet, so if BitComet is using all 10 half-open connections and you try to load a page in your web browser it may take a long time to connect, or even time out. http://www.p2pforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=6431 |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 06:51 PM
|
|
All Stars
17,053 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(jon89 @ Apr 28 2006, 06:26 PM) well......i wont upgrade to 0.66 as some of u says this version sometimes will crash.....now i stick with 0.63.... i think i will not upgrade as well.... |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 08:48 PM
|
|
All Stars
11,927 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL / PJ
|
oh yea, from the link jst now, i check.
there's a link to another forum http://www.lvllord.de/ tat forum has a program for u to change ur half-open tcp limit from 15 (default windows) to 50 or watever limit u wanna input. u guys wanna try it?? This post has been edited by moon*: Apr 28 2006, 08:59 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 09:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,474 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Moon
|
already tried......i put it to 50.....
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 09:27 PM
|
|
All Stars
11,927 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL / PJ
|
i too jst set it to 50, see got difference or not..
QUOTE(jon89 @ Apr 28 2006, 09:25 PM) already tried......i put it to 50..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 09:27 PM
|
Senior Member
5,197 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Muor....
|
QUOTE(jon89 @ Apr 28 2006, 09:25 PM) already tried......i put it to 50..... so, hows da performance? |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 09:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,474 posts Joined: Sep 2005 From: Moon
|
performance? Not sure....
 Didnt notice..... |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 09:30 PM
|
|
All Stars
11,927 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL / PJ
|
lol.. ehh.. not sure yet..
leave it over nite... darn it crash again.. QUOTE(Ultima @ Apr 28 2006, 09:27 PM) so, hows da performance? QUOTE(jon89 @ Apr 28 2006, 09:29 PM) performance? Not sure.... This post has been edited by moon*: Apr 28 2006, 09:35 PM Didnt notice..... |
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 01:49 AM
|
Senior Member
2,144 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuching, Sarawak
|
Yeah, I'm still using 0.65 and yet to encounter any crashes.
|
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 10:53 AM
|
|
All Stars
11,927 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL / PJ
|
dang... i giv u.. reverting back to 0.63
0.65 n 0.66 jst crashes way too often for me.. |
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 01:48 PM
|
Senior Member
1,779 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
0.63 is very stable and fast......
|
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 02:06 PM
|
|
All Stars
17,053 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
so stick with older version better?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0164sec
 0.79
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 12:42 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.