Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Headphones Headphones/ Earphones Recomendation Corner V9, ask options here

views
     
VagueConcerns
post Feb 13 2014, 10:12 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


Hi people. I need a HEADPHONE recommendation.

I listen to metal, rock and all its sub-genres. I want it to be portable as well. I also don't listen very loudly. Rarely do I reach 50% volume for any music player I use.

My sound preference. I already own a Shure SE215-SPE and an AT ATH-IM50 for IEM. I don't listen analytically when I'm out and about, and for my headphones I would like them to be bass monsters compared to my IEMs. So I got many choices open for me. I'm even tempted to buy things I won't normally look at. So I have a few in my mind but I would like your opinion and any other suggestions.

- V-Moda Crossfade LP (if possible LP2)
- V-Moda M80
- Audio Technica M50

For the M80 I do need to let go of one of my IEMs (the IM50 I think), but it is an over-ear. I prefer around-ear but I've had a Grado SR60i before and it was alright. Also it is portable and sounds comparable to the less portable M50 (or so people say).

Nothing touching the RM800 price please. So basically a lot of bass, but with enough detail to let me listen at moderate volumes. Kinda like a Future Sonics Atrio (which I also used to own) but in headphone form.
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 02:08 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


AKG K67, Audio Technica M50x, or AiAiAi TMA-1?
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 11:46 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(psychoactive @ Mar 15 2014, 04:40 AM)
They having diff sound signature, are you into bass/treble? Vocal?
Your music genre?
*
Just looking for something fun, with a lot of bass that doesn't kill the other frequencies.
Actually, scrap the AiAiAi because I may find the non-swivel cups annoying, just the M50x and K67.

My music genre varies, but it ranges from Prog rock to metal and a lot of their sub-genres, oh and also some instrumental. These are the music when I'm on the move. For sitting at my desk I have a Shure SE215-SPE.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Mar 15 2014, 11:49 AM
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 12:33 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(psychoactive @ Mar 15 2014, 12:21 PM)
i would personally skip the K67 as well. They sounds muffled to me.
M50x will probably fit your needs. However, I would recommend something cheaper like the Koss Pro DJ100 or the pricer SoundMAGIC HP100. (if you can find them)
They are both astonishing and i feel they are surely not overhyped as the M50 does. blush.gif
*
Yeah, I have been reading through all my options as I was waiting for replies.
Thanks, I'll look into those as well. biggrin.gif
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 04:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(E1 - AKG @ Mar 15 2014, 03:57 PM)
Do have the Koss ProDJ100 but the SoundMAGIC HP100 is no longer availableĀ  sweat.gif
*
Dang.
Oh well, found another headphone to probably fill in the gap....well more like squeezing into. Pro700mk2. laugh.gif
It stretches my budget quite a bit, but I think I can find a way.
So now, new list:
-Audio Technica Pro700 mk2
-Audio Technica M50/x
-Koss Pro DJ100

I like the 2 audio technicas because of their looks and detachable cble. As I understand it the 700 is the far bassier version of M50...which I find quite intriguing.
but honestly, the DJ100 isn't bad looking either. I would certainly be the only one wearing them around my uni that's for sure. laugh.gif How's the bass on the DJ100?

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Mar 15 2014, 04:07 PM
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 06:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(psychoactive @ Mar 15 2014, 06:34 PM)
No bro, don't get the Pro700 MK2, Its not bassier version of M50. More like self-tuned only for bass emphasis headphone. It is very dark, treble is not detailed and the sounds are congested. I would say the DJ100 has pretty good solid controlled bass but lesser than m50. They have nice forward vocal, pretty good instrument seperation.
*
Noted. Leaning towards the M50x now. smile.gif
VagueConcerns
post Mar 15 2014, 06:57 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(psychoactive @ Mar 15 2014, 06:39 PM)
Better if you could audition the m50 and the kossĀ  tongue.gif to see which you're more into.
*
I have a bass reference to go by, but in IEM form; Future Sonics Atrio. If they have as much bass or even more than that, but without too much loss in everything else, I'm happy. I'm not looking for a headphone for serious monitoring. Anyone have any thoughts on that comparison (M50 vs Atrio)?

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Mar 15 2014, 06:57 PM
VagueConcerns
post Mar 16 2014, 02:12 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(VagueConcerns @ Mar 15 2014, 06:57 PM)
I have a bass reference to go by, but in IEM form; Future Sonics Atrio. If they have as much bass or even more than that, but without too much loss in everything else, I'm happy. I'm not looking for a headphone for serious monitoring. Anyone have any thoughts on that comparison (M50 vs Atrio)?
*
Oh, disregard this, I've made up my mind on the M50x. Though I like bass, I just can't sacrifice too much treble for my Metal music collection.
Also, the M50x seems to have bigger earcups despite smaller drivers.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Mar 16 2014, 02:13 PM
VagueConcerns
post Mar 17 2014, 11:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(graveyardz @ Mar 17 2014, 08:18 PM)
Hello everyone,

- Your rig : Samsung Galaxy S, Sansa Clip Zip
- What type of usage : Music and movies
- File format used in your source : MP3
- Genre of music you listen to : All but mostly pop, EDM, classic, slow song..
- Headphone/ earphone type : IEM
- Other requirements (if any) : Noise isolation if can. Good bass and clarity.

My budget is around RM100~150. Thank you!
*
I think for you there should be some bass involved. I was gonna recommend a Sony EX50...or 55 or something I forgot, and an XB30, but they have average isolation despite sounding rather good.

There's the Hippo Pearl. But I can't remember quite well how they sound like. It was brief and a few years ago. They do have a good bass amount and no sibilance though, that I do remember. Not really at bass head level but a decent amount, almost sounding like that EX55, or 50 Sony.
VagueConcerns
post Mar 17 2014, 11:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(Exogenesis @ Mar 17 2014, 07:42 AM)
Can someone recommend me a place in PJ or KL that I can test out the ATH M40x and M50x??

Would like to get one if the price is good.
*
There's Jaben at Subang Jaya.
Also according to Audio Technica's website there are two shops at KL; Panphil Sdn. Bhd., and Tecxel Global Resources Sdn. Bhd.
VagueConcerns
post Jun 29 2014, 02:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(tolaktakjatuh @ Jun 28 2014, 06:19 PM)
Budget = RM300 max

- Your rig = PC, PS4
- What type of usage = Music 40%, Movies 40%, Games 20%
- File format used in your source = MP3 music, mkv videos, PS4 stereo
- Genre of music you listen to = All type
- Headphone/ earphone type = Full size/Open
Right now, I'm interested with Kraken 7.1 (RM307) / Logitech G430 (RM256), but lots of people suggesting Superlux (<RM200).

Can Superlux headphones give me same/better sound than Razer's and Logitech's?
*
Since you're using it mostly for music and movies, a Superlux would be a wiser choice. A gaming headset's sole purpose is accurate sound placement, and multiplayer experience (talk garbage using the mic tongue.gif ). That 7.1 virtual surround can sound pretty cool. Works great in games especially FPS, but if you listen to music and movies the mid-range (where vocals are) may sound thin and distant. I don't know how these USB powered 7.1 things work, or if you can switch between pure stereo and 7.1, but you will most likely be stuck with a sound that's only good at certain genres. They also lack treble, because you can't have a sound that's fatiguing for hours of gaming.

A Superlux is a music headphone. They can have good stereo imaging, present greater detail, very good for both music and movies. But for gaming you will find that sometimes sounds coming from odd angles aren't presented properly. Enemies coming from the rear may sound exactly the same as enemies coming from the front that are slightly far away. Enemies from top, right may sound like they're coming from the right but distant. Pretty much unsuitable for gaming really, but not a deal breaker. You can still use them, and they're perfectly fine for other games that don't require such precision sound positioning.
VagueConcerns
post Jun 29 2014, 02:33 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(Da_Bomb @ Jun 28 2014, 12:19 PM)
BudgetĀ  = RM100

- My rig = smartphones mostly
- What type of usage = Music
- File format used in your source = MP3
- Genre of music you listen to = EDM, Bass music
- Headphone/ earphone type = IEM
- Other requirements = no mics please. oh god no.Ā  biggrin.gifĀ  And are armature driver better than dynamic? are they worth it?
*
A balanced armature driver generally needs more than one driver per earpiece to get any sort of bass that you can feel, and they are very very expensive. The cheapest single driver armature I had was a SoundMagic PL50. Not a lot of bass that you can feel, but the bass is tight and audible, and that was already RM200. Something like Shure's SE425 has good bass impact, costs almost RM1k.

Spend a bit more and get a Sony XB-30. Your music genre is pretty basic so they should suffice. Slightly cheaper would be EX50. Not as much bass but certainly got impact. A rather old IEM is a Hippo Booml. Pretty decent and certainly for bass heads but I'm not sure if it's still available. Ask Jaben, the official distributor.

Up the ante a bit and get something like a Sennheiser CX300.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jun 29 2014, 02:34 AM
VagueConcerns
post Jun 29 2014, 05:23 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(tolaktakjatuh @ Jun 29 2014, 03:43 AM)
7.1 audio for gaming would be really cool. Is it possible for Superlux to emulate 7.1 using external USB like Kraken does? (if, that USB thing is even exist (and cheapĀ  tongue.gif )).
*
You may be able to come close using a downloadable PC software. Razer has one downloadable, and it is over by 30th June! You can download it and try, and maybe donate a bit for charity. biggrin.gif Or else, pay USD20 when the deadline is over. tongue.gif Just Google Razer 7.1 emulator, or Razer Surround. Only works for PC though.

I don't know of any external device that can emulate such a thing, or even for devices other than than PC.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jun 29 2014, 05:24 AM
VagueConcerns
post Jun 30 2014, 04:02 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jun 29 2014, 07:40 PM)
With all due respect, I disagree.

A good headphone is a good headphone, no matter the usage. All this seperation of "music/audiophile" headphones not being suitable for "gaming" is the reason why people are still being bought over by the laughable marketing gaming companies are doing.

There's a reason why headphones like the AD700 or Q701 trounce over ANY gaming headsets in soundstage, seperation/imaging/accuracy. It's not even a contest.
Also, majority of gaming headsets DO NOT place emphasis on positional accuracy by elevating the mids and the low-treble range, instead they add bass that bleeds all over the mids even when there isn't a bomb exploding in the game.

*
I didn't say they were unsuitable, I said they were not optimal. Taking into consideration the headset of choice and budget:

1. Would you want the hassle of having a separate mic (if they're not uni-directional can easily pickup other people's conversation in a noisy LAN tournament)?
2. If you already have a soundcard that's capable of accurately emulating 5 or 7 channels you're good to go with any decent headphone, but what if you don't?
3. An AD700 has great soundstage and accuracy, no doubt. But at over twice the price and no gamer convenience?

The drivers and ear cup themselves weren't made to do the job, that's why they have built-in emulators. Why bother with complex software algorithms to simulate 7 speakers if sound placement wasn't what gamers want? They were made to make gaming easier, just like a gaming mouse that has those shortcut buttons. They were made with the sole purpose of gaming. Just like why walkie-talkies sound horrible and make women almost sound like men. But they are free to operate, work for decently long ranges, and you can relay information very fast. When you talk about gaming headsets sound quality with music is never in mind. Almost always when a gamer uses them, a game would be loading on the screen. In this case, no matter how good an audiophile headphone is, they're no match for a headset when it comes to games. Leave "conventional" headphones for real music listeners, and real gamers with gaming headsets.

I have, and would still advise that he pick up a decent headphone. He doesn't use it for gaming much and they cost less while performing just as well (or better) with music and movies.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jun 30 2014, 04:14 AM
VagueConcerns
post Jun 30 2014, 06:08 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jun 30 2014, 04:27 AM)
1) Why is a simple lapel mic that IS uni directional so much of a hassle? Clip it to the headphone cable and forget it - http://www.dx.com/p/mini-clip-on-microphon...80#.U7B0GPmSyIs
2) Then buy one. The in-line amps that gaming headsets come with are quite poor in quality, as you know.
3) That's why the recommendation here is a HD681 Evo, the AD700 was just a far fetch comparison.

How are they not optimal? Because with that logic, all gamers should just stick with gaming headsets because they are best made for gaming and audiophile headphones are best JUST for music? Sorry no offense, but that's just a wrong stereotypical assumption.

Also, there exists numerous games that aren't horrible in audio quality or one dimensional recordings that are affixed to the typical FPS games. There are games which are immersive, with good musical tracks, good sound effects. You'd wanna waste them on a typical gaming headset because of some slight convenience advantage?
*
We both gave the same recommendation forget the headset, go with a conventional one.
But, you seem to add that gaming headsets have no place in the world and if they had souls they'd burn in hell.
You have a really negative sentiment against them.

These guys, presumably unlike tolaktakjatuh spends 5,6 hours, even more a day with games. Maybe an hour or 2 a week with music. Many gamers don't care for sound quality that much, as long as guns sound like guns and people sound like people. They would opt for the convenience of having everything in one unit, instead of having to buy a separate mic and then maybe a mic/headphone splitter if they have a laptop that has only one port, just so that in the RARE occasion that they do listen to music they'd get the best possible sound quality. They pay for that convenience, just like why anyone would pay for a BT headphone when a wired one would have much more potential with sound quality. I am in no way a gaming headset fan, I'm purely a music guy, but I do understand why someone would go with a headset if he's serious about it. They do have their place, that's all I am saying. If they are even only slightly critical with sound quality, I would think they themselves would opt for a conventional headphone without anyone telling them to do so.

Let us get things straight. For his case, a gaming headset will be quite pointless as they are not very enjoyable with movies.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jun 30 2014, 06:14 AM
VagueConcerns
post Jul 1 2014, 12:30 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(tolaktakjatuh @ Jun 30 2014, 11:35 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Alright guys, between 668B and 681 Evo, which one is the better buy? I usually listen to rock musics, oldies, alternatives, some malay songs.
*
The 668b is said to be tuned towards the neutral side. Some may find that it is balanced, others may find that it is bright. It's bass extends quite low and presented with detail and speed, I can't recall the impact (demo unit I listened quite a while ago) it had but bass isn't its forte. I would describe it as having a slight V-shape frequency, as the mids does sound recessed, with elevated treble and bass. These have a great ability to present details.

The 681 Evo has a more bass heavy presentation, and very warm sounding. Good sound stage, enough treble to keep anyone satisfied but never gets too "hot". Not as detailed but has a more "street" friendly sound, meaning no one would be offended by its sound, unlike the 668B which some may find overly bright. This isolates better too.

My recommendation would be the 681 Evo. For movies they're quite awesome, and I think they'd look better with the PS4. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jul 1 2014, 12:35 AM
VagueConcerns
post Jul 1 2014, 05:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(l4nc3k @ Jul 1 2014, 01:42 PM)
I got a gift from a friend just recently (Logitech G410) because he knows I play a lot of games that require communication with teammates.

But the thing is, although the name is a 'gaming headset', the sound quality is so inferior when I'm doing other stuffs. I'm an all-rounded music listener and listens to music ranging from the latest pop songs to metals/hard rock to classical (yes Beethoven) songs, and the G410 isn't gonna cut it (to be honest even my iPhone earpods are way better).

I did some research on the internet and a lot of feedbacks say that I should buy the mic and headphone separately, but with no suggestions available (those with suggestions date back to 2011 - super outdated).

So sifus here can help me to decide on what headset / mic to buy? If this helps, I'm using Lenovo Y510p and iphone 5 (rarely use headset on this - iphone earpods too comfortable). I'm a total noob in this and had relied on iphone earpods and laptop build in mic to communicate before this.

tl;dr I'm looking for a decent sound quality headphone that can be used in normal music listening, videos and a lot of gaming communication (no need too extreme like those that can clearly differentiate footstep - I don't play FPS games anyway). Prefer those that won't disturb people beside me, and my budget is <rm500 for both headphone and mic.

Thanks!

Edit: I have bigger-than-average ears so a suggestion for a bigger headset will be appreciated. the G410 that I'm currently using gets very uncomfortable after 1~2 hours wearing it. Have to take it off to relieve my ears after every dota game doh.gif
*
"Although the name is a gaming headset". biggrin.gif
Of course they're not going to sound as good with music, because they are gaming headsets. You're more critical with music than games so you need a proper headphone, what you need is a big closed-back headphone.
For some reason the JVC rectangular headphone thing pops up in my head. IINM they're priced like RM500 and are quite big, closed back, and isolates very well. But they look like toasters on your head. laugh.gif As heavy as one too. tongue.gif Superlux has a few nice big closed backs (like an HD660). I have an HD681 Evo and although they are semi-open, unless you listen VERY loudly they won't leak sound out.
VagueConcerns
post Jul 1 2014, 10:46 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(l4nc3k @ Jul 1 2014, 06:22 PM)
yea I have to agree that gaming headsets does compromise audio quality a little too much rclxub.gif
aiya I don't want something that will look like a dang toaster beside my ears biggrin.gif google imaged those and was like blink.gif
I'll check on the Superlux series. Thanks!

did a brief google on Superlux: what are monitoring headphones anyway? Most reviews say that they are not as suitable for music listening icon_question.gif
*
Like what H3LLKEEPER said, some enjoy monitors for music listening, some don't.

Monitors are what the name implies; they are used to check for quality over a production, to "monitor" the music. Preferably when monitoring a music piece you want the headphone to be as neutral as possible. Some enjoy this type of headphone because a lot of the time you'd hear the details in the frequency range that are often clouded by "conventional" tuning, like background hisses, quiet triangle instrument in a busy orchestra piece, the breath noises of a singer, etc. They can be quite exciting to listen to and you'd probably listen to your entire library again with them.

However, some people do find that often they are light on bass, bright and "hot" in the treble region, too flat and unexciting. Not all of them are like that, some do have a respectable amount of bass and can even have recessed treble, like a Sennheiser HD650. Depends on the musical taste of the producer. They tend to be rather expensive and properly big. For those who have never experienced a monitor sound, care must be taken in purchasing one without an audition. There are polite sounding headphones that sort of come close to monitor sounding, like the Fischer Audio FA-004 (these are cheap, but small BTW so I wouldn't recommend them for you).

Also there are DJ monitors, and are different than studio monitors. DJ monitors tend to have full-bodied bass and high level of isolation, and have swivelled ear cups, suitable in noisy clubs and one-handed operation. A few famous examples would be Audio Technica M50, and Shure SRH750.

Try them out, maybe a monitor sound is fresh for you and you'd like 'em. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jul 1 2014, 10:48 PM
VagueConcerns
post Jul 1 2014, 11:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
888 posts

Joined: Jan 2013


QUOTE(l4nc3k @ Jul 1 2014, 10:53 PM)
Thanks for the explanation!
Monitor headsets seems very interesting but I think most of them are out of my price range rclxub.gif just did a brief check on Sennheiser HD650 and it costs around rm1.4k sweat.gif
you have any recommendation for me? Or just the best headset you think that have a budget around 400~500. Thanks biggrin.gif
*
There are monitors that costs very little, and Superlux does offer them.
As for a recommendation....the HD660 is the only thing that comes close with your requirements (big and closed back). Spend extra on Beyerdynamic replacement pads. All in all budget should be under RM350. They have quite a lot of bass too if you're into that. I don't remember much else.

I also noticed one person recommending the M40x for another person. That is actually a very good headphone, but may be too small for you if your ears are a big as what you say they are.

This post has been edited by VagueConcerns: Jul 1 2014, 11:14 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0685sec    0.88    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 08:53 AM