nah member aku buat. guna balik je video RMN.

Heck, kirim salam perkenalan aku kat kawan adik ko nama Zurul Afinaz Zamani tu
amanah ni wei, baik buat,t ak buat berdosaaa
kekekkee

ohh hai heavyduty

[/spoiler]
Rafale memang bermati matian kena cari pasaran...sbb deal dia ngan India pun bermasaalah

lol bang kalau tengok km/liter only we all should be driving kancil. or kapchai. paling jimat.

lol bang kalau tengok km/liter only we all should be driving kancil. or kapchai. paling jimat.

aih, Operation cost mana tengok minyak je bang!
Maintenance?
Parts?
Crew?
Framelife preserving procedure?

tu letak mana?

Aku tak boleh nak cerita real figure of operation cost of 17 Squadron per annum,
takut nanti boleh disalah guna oleh orang yang tak bertanggung jawab serta ada harapan aku masuk lokap (hishhh mintak jauhhhhh~)

Typhoon.
1. Cost per aircraft mahal (T3)
2. Support crew ramai
3. Supports machine seperti, dehumidifier, total renovation of hanger to fully air condition, extra care product (nak jaga fuselage kat cuaca panas)
4. Limited technology due to many of it still in testing phase
5. Nak bayar duit kat 5 negara (remember that this plane is build from 5 different nation)
6. Not battlefield proved yet!

Superhornet (or other US plane)
The most best choice, in term of money and matured technology but
1. Limited technology, resource and weapon. Yes US will determined and controled what we will get. (The closer you with US, they will favour you. We are not that close to US like the SG, TH and Indo)
2. Close watch from the US congress and every major decision or modification on the toys need the US congress written consent.
3. Banyak procedure nak kene buat bila dealing with US toys.
4. Rujuk no.3 WE CAN'T GET WHAT WE WANT - kalau tidak in 2000++ kita dah pakai SH with AESA radar. Malaysia was the 1st country offered to have SH in exchange for their F/A-18D
5. Again political factor involved is huge
Rafale
1. Cost more than SH but less then Typhoon
2. Battlefield proven and good track record during Libya war where only the Rafale go deep to destroy SAM battery radars
3. Have a good weapon proven system.
4. We can built our own Rafale kat Malaysia
5. We can get what we want in term of weapon, system and sensors.
6. MKM have a similar system to Rafale so TUDM have operated a familiar system to Rafale (tak percaya tengok video pilot TUDM MKM pilot sekarang pakai helmet French)
7. Again, the weapon in rafale also can be used with MKM (MICA)

Gripen
1. The most economical choice
2. Less crew to operate and less support crew need
3. TUDM prefer dual engine but ready to make exception
4. Some parts esp the engine are US made, so tengok balik SH no.1
5. Good weapon system
6. Leased with option to buy are available.
7. A good interim replacement for MMRCA candidate (Rafale/Typhoon/SH) before the arrival in 2020
8. Good replacement for F5E fleet and Hawk!

so tengok sendiri la kenapa wa PILIH rafale over Typhoon! 

according to Marhalim, airforce right now in the process of preparing FRP for MRCA....
and leasing is one of the option...

SHAH ALAM: RMAF chief Jen Tan Sri Rodzali Daud confirmed today that the RFP for the MRCA programme will be out soon. He told Malaysian Defence that the air force was in the midst of preparing the requirements for the MRCA before presenting it to the government to issue out the RFP.
He was accompanying Defence Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein for a visit to the Subang air base. Among the aircraft on static display was a Eurocopter EC-725 (tail number 04), a F/A-18D Hornet (07), a King Air, a Hercules C130, CN235 and a Sukhoi Su-30MKM.The Cougar 04 together with tail number 3 (not displayed) were recently ferried from France and was undergoing final tests before delivery to the RMAF.
Rodzali didnt say when the RFP is expected to be issued as the matter rightfully belonged to the government. He however indicated that leasing was an option that the government might have to decide on for the programme due to affordability issues. That said, he indicated that it does not mean the Gripen was a shoe-in for the programme but it was clear with the leasing gambit, the Swedish single engine jet had catapulted itself to the forefront of the competition.
However as I mentioned before if the RFP- some sources says it will be issued after the Umno elections in October – document call for leasing as an option it is more than likely that the Eurofighter consortium will offer a similar deal for the Typhoon. I am not sure whether the Typhoon package will be cheaper than the Gripen but it will be interesting to see that play out within the next few months.
In an email interview for Asian Defence Journal, Rodzali stated that four contenders remained in the MRCA race namely (in no particular order) Typhoon, Gripen, Rafale and Super Hornet. He stated that the Su-30MKM is out of the competition although he did not mentioned the reason.

As Rodzali also said that they had no plans to upgrade or extend the service of the MiG-29 it therefore expected that the Russian jets will be retired by 2015. Upgrades (limited to updates to the navigation system to comply with new air traffic management) to the Hercules was ongoing though there was no plans to do so for the Hawk.
As for the AEW, Rodzali said today that the matter was still under consideration though he indicated that the air force would prefer a jet solution instead of a turbo-prop.

–Malaysian Defence

x, xtemujin and alfie007 is not the same person.
Alf is quite busy now with Red Cross affairs