Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V9, Happy birthday Malaysia & ATM ke 50 & 80

views
     
zimhibikie
post Jul 9 2013, 05:02 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Jul 9 2013, 04:59 PM)
Pinoy hate china..and yet they still choose China's jets as one of the candidates..?
*
Pinoy? Royal Thai AF la bro..

Even the RTAF is considering getting advanced LIFT like T-50...
zimhibikie
post Jul 15 2013, 10:51 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Jul 14 2013, 02:05 AM)


user posted image

user posted image

..............................

*
boleh pun local company design and fabricate 1,000+ tan vessel...can be base design for future patrol vessels for TLDM and Apam..
zimhibikie
post Jul 24 2013, 04:02 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(azriel @ Jul 24 2013, 03:03 PM)
I tot Nakhoda Ragam class vessels are going to Northern Africa? Indon really beefing up their fleet..
zimhibikie
post Aug 5 2013, 09:20 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Aug 5 2013, 07:47 AM)
391 billion USD?? for the F-35s alone?? good lord..i'll be shitting bricks..M'sia can have a hell lots of Sukhoi squadrons, thousands of Pendekar and multiple navy armadas with that much money.. ohmy.gif
*
but RSAF plans to buy up to 100 F35 wat..
zimhibikie
post Aug 9 2013, 12:52 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(katsumoto2011 @ Aug 9 2013, 12:50 PM)
it dont have the ability to launch fighter/bomber aircraft from the carrier (at least that the official statement from Japanese government)

it only carrying helicopter for the time being , but some military expert already comment that in future it MIGHT BE renovate to launch fighter/bomber aircraft

the same Bullshit that china tell about Varyag .........
*
but China already been saying that they will put SU33 derivatives onboard the Varyag...
zimhibikie
post Aug 9 2013, 01:13 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(katsumoto2011 @ Aug 9 2013, 01:10 PM)
the time china buy varyag they told the seller it gonna be a floating casino

and look at it now what it has become .......
so if Japanese government later announce renovate to refit fighter/bomber i wont be surprise about it ......

and just to let you know Japanese government already in discussion with US for year wanting to buy the F35 but the congress wont approve the bill
if the F35 been approve at the congress , i bet that the 1st choice it will be on broad of the izumo
*
those in the know already knew that was just a ruse...

actually, I do support Japan's move to expand its military and changing its constitution so that its JSDF is not just for self-defense, but also has first strike option
zimhibikie
post Aug 9 2013, 02:30 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Aug 9 2013, 02:27 PM)
they should class it as it is!
a massive helicopter carrier!

Type 10?  wub.gif  wub.gif
*
kita bila mau ada itu 'aviation cruiser'? tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif
zimhibikie
post Aug 9 2013, 02:40 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Aug 9 2013, 02:36 PM)
kalau aku yang sign contract tuuuu...
dah docking kat Lumut dah 1 hahahhaha
oh lupa Selamat Hari Raya guys, esp uncle zim
mai duit raya  wub.gif

err kerja jugak ka hang hari ni  blink.gif
*
thanx..arini keje jugak tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif

nanti aku bank in utk ko RM 1 laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 10:49 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(bubu2010 @ Aug 18 2013, 08:20 PM)
M1A2 is a crap compared to T-90 or Leopard 2 or MBT2000 biggrin.gif
*
Crap? M1A2, tho not my favourite, is still one of the best battle-proven tank around..
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 10:54 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Aug 18 2013, 10:51 PM)
lol
u really think they bought the leos without thinking "hey, can i cross the causeway on these?"
*
Well, the Singaporeans aint dumb, there sure have plans on how to transport their Leos, not just across the causeway je..but its sure a b**** for their engineers lar tongue.gif tongue.gif
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 10:55 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Aug 18 2013, 10:55 PM)
they already have m3g amphi rigs that can transport leos.
so yeah, they got a way.
*
same over here, we also have a way to counter that laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 11:01 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Aug 18 2013, 10:59 PM)
user posted image
*
in order to achieve this, the area must be totally secure..looks nice in training exercises, but defending long pontoon bridges like this from land, sea and air assault during actual battle will be a b****..
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 11:08 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(keown83 @ Aug 18 2013, 11:06 PM)
wow
what make us think that those singapore leos are for an attack on malaysian soil?
& what makes us think that those pendekar are for an attack on singapore soil?


btw, there's no real proven beat tank in the world until u send them into real battle & improvise the tank time by time..& for me, the real best & battle proven tank in the world is actually, challenger II..this low profile tanks never failed during operation iraqi freedom
*
prudent planning
zimhibikie
post Aug 18 2013, 11:45 PM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(kucinganaz @ Aug 18 2013, 11:44 PM)
Japan Type 10 is better than abrams.light as pt91.
*
battle-proven yet?
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 09:35 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Aug 19 2013, 02:03 AM)
i think it's safe to say that every country in SEA already have secret plan to invade each other in case of war...  brows.gif
*
I believe that SEA nations have both defensive and offensive battle plans drawn up against one another. the good thing is that SEA nations knew that the consequences of waging war against another doesnt not bode weel to anyone..
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 10:18 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(bai1101 @ Aug 19 2013, 10:15 AM)
due to china i believe SEA strategy now will be about more coastline defense  hmm.gif

Since china already had their carrier under testing which worried surrounding country more :/
*
But their carrier battle group is more towards rivaling the US 7th Fleet with JSDF Navy. I think SEA who are in conflict with China over Spratlys and Paracels has not fully upgraded their anti-ship capabilities, except us and the Vietnamese
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 11:18 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(hafizushi @ Aug 19 2013, 11:10 AM)
the way i see right now sgpore, indo, vietnamese, thai all have better/superior navy than us, until we acquire the LCS in 2017

but we do have superior airforce compare to other SEA and on par with sgpore
*
I do agree we have less modern surface vessels than othe SEA nations, but we are going towards the right path. 6 new Gowind vessels and the possibility of finally arming the Kedah-class NGPVs is good. And we do have good air-launched anti-ship missiles..
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 11:25 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Aug 19 2013, 11:24 AM)
actually we can upgrade our fleet in relatively no time if we really into it

http://www.dsme.co.kr/epub/ds/td/dstd030Q....currentPageNo=1
and here i thought it took at least 2 years to build a frigate.
*
The longer time for frigate is probably due to the weapon system installation. Even more if the weapon system is rojak one, coming from many nations. The training vessels only got guns..

Tho, with the training vessel's platform, maybe can develop patrol vessels..

This post has been edited by zimhibikie: Aug 19 2013, 11:26 AM
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 11:31 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Aug 19 2013, 11:29 AM)
that only true if we totally rojak the dang thing. like bae electronic but using chinese C-802 SSM. itu baru rojak.

like bangla frigate INS bangdanghinhu....whatitsname... it took 10 years to get the damn thing straight. last time the bangla went full retard on using chinese ships and chinese electronic suite but western weapon system

this is DSME (a JV of thales and korean company) if we stick to using korean/french system the integration should go smoothly
*
Hopefully DSME will develop more advanced vessels and can market their product overseas better..
zimhibikie
post Aug 19 2013, 11:53 AM

Freak of Nature
*******
Senior Member
2,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Harlan County


QUOTE(yinchet @ Aug 19 2013, 11:51 AM)
During ww2 US lagi gila laju yo.
*
hari ini bina, semalam siap... laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

see, if no hanky panky, sure fast fast la complete fabrication...

5 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0508sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:30 AM