I wouldn't say that cause its so based on personal opinion and personal taste.

Well to me lenses is just a tool to get a job done. Now different tools are needed for different jobs.

If he mention the job then said this is the best tool for the job then maybe I would agree ya.

To me very good. BTW how long was the exposure?

From my experience for best quality, you get a scanner that can scan film negatives. What you get is a negative but then use Photoshop to invert the colours. The quality is far better than scanning the developed photos.

my one let's me go very high. It's not a normal scanner but one that a slot to insert films. Ask around n you will find it.

what I did when I started out was shoot in AUTO 1st. then look at the camera's setting for that shot. From that use Manual fiddle here and there and before you know it you will be shooting Manual all the way. hehe

Not sure if the pro's here agree with method of learning but it worked for me.

Great picture looks habited with cities and road/rail network!

Cheras here can smell the smoke from the haze so go figure. I'm staying indoors with my ioniser blowing full blast. Stay safe guys. Most prob will play with indoor photography today.

agree but don't you find it funny that people buy a dslr for video when there are proper video cams around?

Ah but my point is Canon's marketing is telling you that their dslr does video's very well. When it should be take fantastic pictures with a bonus of some video making.

Guess that is why I choose Nikon. Camera for pictures with a bonus of video (not saying that canon can't take good pictures too).

Proper video camera would be \http://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/professional-camcorders.asp