QUOTE(slimfox @ Jul 11 2013, 04:24 AM)
Ah but my point is Canon's marketing is telling you that their dslr does video's very well. When it should be take fantastic pictures with a bonus of some video making.
Guess that is why I choose Nikon. Camera for pictures with a bonus of video (not saying that canon can't take good pictures too).
Proper video camera would be
\http://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/professional-camcorders.aspDslr for video , u can have more lenses to choose and shoot, and nowaday alot of advertisment , wedding , also done by dslr , keda.Z, Cm leung , +M also using dslr to shoot video, no matter sony, nikon, canon.
Not to mention, spending so much on camcorder just for video? Why not I just settle down with dslr? I can do landscape shoot, portrait, off camera flash yet shoot video, can camcorder done this?
With dslr u can play with the dof, lens with f1.2, f1.4, f1.8 can be done by camcorder?
Would u bring such big camcorder to travel or rather choose dslr?
This post has been edited by chongkiatz: Jul 11 2013, 09:14 AM