Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Proton Suprima, New Perdana Based on Accord?
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 24 2013, 09:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kadajawi @ Apr 24 2013, 08:38 PM) Second hand value of the Honda Accord will drop like RIM shares.  it won't reason it very simple other than the outlook is somewhat similar, everything else is different even the engine is different, proton will be using the new 2.0L petronas engine so technically speaking, its not even a rebadge This post has been edited by MR_alien: Apr 24 2013, 09:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 12:24 AM
|
|
QUOTE(MTB_King @ Apr 24 2013, 09:46 PM) Betul ke nie? I have been looking for some spyshot since i posted this tapi tak de pun. I really hope someone in Proton will post pics of the new Perdana if its ready... this will be interesting to follow. As far as i have read, it seems the E01 engine was fitted to a Waja and a Satria GTI in 1998. Dont recall finding any further info on the performance and reliability after that. Apart from the initial performance figures, there is still a big question mark. they only file trademark for the name only car hasn't even start to develope or anything this name could be for any new car for proton
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 12:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 24 2013, 11:34 PM) i was hoping that they can develop more cfe engine.let say 1.8 or 2.0 cfe with 160-180hp for pedana replacement. or maybe 1.0 cfe for savvy replacement. which would u prefer 2L CFE or 2L E01 engine? 2L CFE torque should be nice but its going be more thirsty than ever ...maybe like 2.5L car's FC
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 12:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 25 2013, 07:11 AM) not sure either p1 going to use e01 straight since it's an old engine (emission restriction). maybe use the tech and redesign the whole engine. nway, tubo might be thirsty, but the main advantage is cheaper roadtax. for example pug vti and thp..thp is more thirsty than vti (fc around 1.8- 2.0L car), but way cheaper roadtax than 2.0 car. but those are advanced modern engine while CFE aka campro is an basic old engine with nothing in it...thats why the thirstiness
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 02:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 25 2013, 02:42 PM) the project started in 96..was planned to use it by 2005. cfe is not really ori campro engine. a bit smaller displacement, different vvt mechanism compared to cps. it is thristy because of the turbo..proton nowhere near vw tsi or bmw prince thp..but still a modern engine. ic...thn they have more improvement to do but if lite turbo already so thirsty, if they plug in bigger turbo...its gonna be more thristy
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 04:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 25 2013, 02:52 PM) yeap..just give them few more years. maybe they can come out with new engine based on petronas engine. never own a cfe proton..but is it thristy? i mean compared to 1.8-2.0 car. it has almost the same FC as inspira...so go figure
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 25 2013, 04:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 25 2013, 04:24 PM) haha it should have the power/torque of a 2.0L(which is has) and the FC of a 1.6L(which it doesn't have)
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 26 2013, 09:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(katijar @ Apr 26 2013, 01:10 PM) if really got rebadged accord, who still want to buy new accord? its not even gonna be a rebadge
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR_alien
|
Apr 26 2013, 09:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ironfolic @ Apr 26 2013, 04:09 PM) All see proton say this and that no good. Y no develop it own engine  See others bigger car manufacture which is better then proton. The gearbox still got problem, air bag problem la etc but no complain.  so campro not developed by proton?
|
|
|
|
|