Jul 9 2016, 12:04 PM
QUOTE(BEANCOUNTER @ Jul 9 2016, 09:01 AM)
Uoa no frill developer...
Rhey delivered wat they promised.
Usually units are good upon vp with very little defects required and on time.
Good finishing comes w 'branded' sanitarywares.
No problem w titles ir resell. Not sure those properties vped now.
The downsides are
Common area close to bare....but that reflexes in their maintenance fee
They are not cheap...usually not much money left for flippers
High density
Deliver what they promised is quite a big claim.. if u ask setapak green... they will ask you back... which part? LolRhey delivered wat they promised.
Usually units are good upon vp with very little defects required and on time.
Good finishing comes w 'branded' sanitarywares.
No problem w titles ir resell. Not sure those properties vped now.
The downsides are
Common area close to bare....but that reflexes in their maintenance fee
They are not cheap...usually not much money left for flippers
High density
If u see artist impression of South view vs current state... how much % assembly artist impression?
Conclusion is.. if you like location, guaranteed delivery, high density with medium cost apartment facade, no frills design but you get low maintenance fee, do buy UOA product.
Also be noted... UOA consistently generate 50% profit margin to shareholders... I will rather be the shareholder than be the buyer of UOA product.
This post has been edited by gks: Jul 9 2016, 12:06 PM
Quote
0.0351sec
0.69
7 queries
GZIP Disabled