QUOTE
The issue I want to highlight here is not the fact of whether I am eligible for the 90% loan, but which should I choose if both these banks approved my loan? Since I myself is qualified to get the loan, I don't see why another name that currently does not earn any money needs to be placed on the loan agreement. a + b is still a if b is 0 . If she was earning, I would understand the logic that adding her salary would make me in a better position to get the loan, but this isn't the case now.
Talk to the bank..it is technically possible for a joint owner (in this case, yr gf) not to be the borrower. She needs to sign some documents to consent to the property which she owns 50% of, to be charged to the bank as security for the loan. However, the bank may not be keen to approve if your credit rating is not very strong. Your case then becomes more risky (credit assessement wise) as they will view it as some form of non-commitment on the side of co-owner is not a borrower and therefore not liable for the loan repayment.
QUOTE
I'm not too concern bout the repayment amount but more like the importance of a withdraw facility vs the freedom of my future wife not to be bounded by the loan. So if next time wanna buy a new car or another house.. I can still use her name mah since mine got quite a lot of commitments dy.
Ask for part of the loan to be in overdraft...that way, you have a redraw facility liao. Most banks allow a max of 50% to be in O/D portion.
QUOTE
Or another question is panel bank (no withdraw facility) vs non panel bank (with withdraw facility). I'm not too sure the implications of non-panel banks. Developer say chance of late payment by the bank is higher which will cause the borrower to pay the fine.
You mention about the house being ready in 2 yrs...ie construction if already started should be at a very early stage. Since billing are as per construction stage, the interest for unpaid bills will be on the portion billed only. The possiblility of you having to pay interest on late payment due to (assumed) slower loan release (due to non-panel banks) will depend a lot more on other factors like:
Are the individual titles issued?...are the titles charged?....who are the chargor banks?
QUOTE
I was looking at a low rates for the first few years because I need the extra money for furnishing and stuff which is why I did not opt for a fixed rate. Unfortunately, there's no one else I can depend on for joint loan application. My future wife curently does not own a car and we don't plan to get another car so soon.
Go check with the bank. Most, if not all of these sudsidized rates for the initial few years, start from the loan approval date, or date of 1st drawdown. In yr case of a 90% loan, it would mean, perhaps as fast as 3 mths from now. So, actually, the low rates are only applicable for portions of your loan amount only.
For calculation of your personal finance, you would need to use the repayment fig of est. RM 1991/mth (i used 6.6% pa. daily rest for RM315k loan for 30 yrs term)
Since yr gf is not earning any income , adding her name as borrower is of no consequence to loan application, provided she is not the joint owner as stated in the SPA.
QUOTE
Both the mentioned banks said the I can qualify for 90% loan based on their prelimanary calculation. I'm not sure how reliable the information I receive from this mortgage loan officer is. I've heard cases that banks can just reject your application without any reason.
You may want to enquire if the 90% include the amount for MRTA.If it does, it essentially cuts into your loan margin to pay for the house. ..make sure you have the extra to pay towards that. Plus add a rough est. of 3% of purchase pc to cover legal fees, disbursement and misc. charges.
This post has been edited by ??!!: Apr 19 2006, 12:20 PM