QUOTE(maverickng @ Jul 12 2013, 04:38 PM)
WXW 9733. I wonder how this driver got into this position.Proton Prevé V18, more and more on da roads!
Proton Prevé V18, more and more on da roads!
|
|
Jul 17 2013, 03:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
This Preve CFE Turbo's 0-100km/h acceleration at 9.6s is even quicker than the Proton Inspira 2.0 right? Is this figure accurate? The CFE Turbo can really achieve below 10.0s in 0-100km/h? Anybody tried?
This post has been edited by Dwango: Jul 25 2013, 12:54 PM |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(farghmee @ Jul 25 2013, 11:08 AM) hi all, I don't own the Preve but if comparing between a NEW Preve and NEW Myvi, I would think the cabin noise would be quite close between the Preve and Myvi at 0km/h and 60km/h. At 120km/h, the Preve will likely be quieter due to the higher capacity engine and better sound insulation. Similarly 170km/h the Preve will likely be quieter as the 1.3-litre engine in the Myvi would be struggling like hell at this speed. Not too sure if Myvi can reach 170km/h. can everyone share with me their experience on: 1. how the cabin noise in preve cfe compared to 1st gen myvi at these car speed: a. not moving/idle, b. 60 km/h, c. 120 km/h, d. 170 km/h. 2. excitement of driving preve cfe compared to gen2 thru Ayer Hitam-Mersing road. (if any) 3. it is true that normal servicing of a proton preve cfe is costlier than honda city/toyota vios? -i haven't driven a preve cfe before. exora bold cfe, yes. -once a month i'll go to mersing. -i'm interested to know the running cost of these 3cars. inb4 -their in different class. As for your question no. 2, the Myvi would be no match for the Lotus-tuned handling of the Preve. The Myvi's cornering and stability will lose to Preve. Just one look at the body of both cars and you would know. THe Myvi looks narrow and tall while the Preve looks wide and short which is more grounded to the earth. As for servicing costs, no idea. |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
This Preve CFE Turbo's 0-100km/h acceleration at 9.6s is even quicker than the Proton Inspira 2.0 right? Is this figure accurate? The CFE Turbo can really achieve below 10.0s in 0-100km/h? Anybody tried?
|
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 02:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
Dang, this Preve Turbo really has some turbo kick in it.
|
|
|
Sep 10 2013, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(bobbykatoi @ Sep 10 2013, 12:15 PM) TQ for the reply. i'm somehow leaning towards solid white. seen one with a bodykit before and instantly hook me. All this color is subjective as different people will like different colors. For me, white is nice color, followed by silver. But white is solid and not metallic, so difficult to maintain the color. More care is needed to keep the white in tip top condition. With time, the white may lose its shine and turn yellowish. Having said that, other metallic colors will also lose its shine, but the effects may not be as obvious as solid white. Silver is evergreen and a care-free color. Easy to maintain. If dirty, just use water is enough. Silver is also nice to me. All other colors - red, black, gold, blue, are an acquired taste. Either you like it or hate it. For me, the white looks best(disregarding disadvantages), followed by silver. |
|
|
Sep 13 2013, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
491 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
QUOTE(mat79 @ Sep 13 2013, 08:19 AM) wait until 10k service,then its optimum then. for preve iafm,the weight did hampered its city drive. and rm50 is old price,now around rm55. and its on average. Don't need to be so complicated. In summary, be light-footed and don't let the revs be high above 2,000 is enough. Keep the rpm around 1500-2000 in traffic jam situations. but i can give u a tip on how to juice up ur fc n understand how punch cvt work. apply to all,same as cfe. in city traffic, when u stop at traffic n want to start moving,never press ur throttle 1st,wait until the car start moving or rolling bx itself n the rpm raise by 1krpm++,then u start to press the fuel pedal. 2nd, for punch cvt, there are 3 diff strategies applied. no 1, 1k rpm to 1.6 krpm,torque being reduce a bit for ease of parking,crawling in traffic jam and driving around housing area when speed is only up to 40kmh max. when u r crawling in traffic jam,stop n go movement when speed isnt exceeding 40kmh,just rev around that region. no 2, 1.7krpm to 1.9krpm,or exactly below 2krpm,for city driving n slow hway cruising,the engine wil labour for optimum fuel efficiency,same as cvt ratio. yup its feel slow,but adequate enough in city driving where speed is not more than 80 kmh. so,if ur driving in town n traffic is smooth,only stop at traffic light,n after that smooth,then rev around this region. no 3,2k rpm and beyond,this is when the character of cvt change,for cfe,of course feel like a massive torque,for iafm+,u will feel its power start to come. the cvt ratio is more on agressive ratio,where low ratio is being given utmost priority,to ease overtaking,sudden acceleration,fully loaded, hill climbing etc. slam the pedal a bit beyond 2k rpm,even at 2.1krpm,u will feel diff feeling compare to below 2krpm, u can hear the cvt n engine roar a bit. this is where normally people will drive,but being cvt,that is not the most fuel efficient. and since cvt, u will feel below 2krpm is really slow,but actually its not that slow. the speed still climb as conventional at at around 2k to 2.5krpm,due to smoothness,u feel it slow. thats why many kaki's dont like cvt,it doesnt give manly feeling same as manual or conventional auto or dsg. and dont use sat function for iafm unless u know how to manipulate it. it may give better acceleration feeling,but just the feeling,not the speed. try out urself,using sat,rev not exceeding 2krpm each gear,driving in full cvt mode,slam to 2krpm. cmpare the feeling and the speed. Another method is not to press and hold the accelerator pedal to move the car forward. Press a bit, lift up your foot and press a bit more in short intervals. This will also save fuel, but of course the car won't be accelerating rapidly but in slow steady pace. As for your recommendation on letting the car move by itself from 0km/h, as the poster above Kinitos has mentioned, although it may be good to save fuel, but if the car in front is moving fast and there is a lot of space in front and your Preve is moving like a turtle, the driver behind will not be very happy. Some may horn you or overtake from the left. If you leave too much space in front, other cars from the left will cut in, and this will cause your lane to move slower, as the vehicles behind you will lose out more if many vehicles keep cutting in front of you. IN other words, other vehicles are moving faster than you and you are preventing other vehicles from moving up further in front the road. You can of course drive in the middle lane or left lane, but then surely the lorries or big trucks will sound the horn if they see too much space in front as if your engine is malfunctioning or something. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0618sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 07:48 PM |