Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Singapore, Indonesia race for military supremacy, in Southeast Asia

views
     
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 10:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Singpor will win in short term through their supreme airforce capabilities
But if the war lasted more than a year,sure indon will slowly capture the island by guerilla war and sabo the supply line(this time many of singporean fled their state),that time malaysia is singpore's best hope
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 10:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(ray123 @ Mar 27 2013, 10:37 AM)
Their military doctrine is deterrence, and if it comes to war; a quick and outright decisive victory. That's why they require a modern air force and tanks.
*
Air force and tanks have their limits for several few months only,coz require millions of liters of oil,indon bomb the refineries,cut the sealine supply, victory no more
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 10:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(ray123 @ Mar 27 2013, 10:46 AM)
You only need a few hours for a decisive victory = one battle to win the strategic picture.
*
Just like USA's "Shock and Awe"campaign at iraq 10years ago?don't know how many thousands of US personnels died since that
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 10:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(w3er @ Mar 27 2013, 10:47 AM)
padan muka la...  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
siapa suruh u hari hari go support taib and umno !!! LOL!!! kasi songlap sampai habis ini malingsia
so u the military expert here now?
*
He 10x better than u
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 02:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(Weldon29 @ Mar 27 2013, 02:02 PM)
Modern Singapore is built by the British and the Chinese though. the Malays have nothing to do with modern Singapore, can't see why they would think it would belong to them now
*
Totaly BS
During british empire at Tanah Melayu,all natural resources from peninsular is being extracted and exported to UK,British HQ is at singpore and highly-developed sea port owned by brirish and British military installation also based there that time
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 02:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(Weldon29 @ Mar 27 2013, 02:08 PM)
Wish people would stop claiming territory for historical reasons
*
Of course la noob,who in the right mind want to claim singapore based on historical empire?but now in modern world, if singpore ever attacked by indon,malaysia automaticaly need to assist(if they push the fpda button)
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 02:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(w3er @ Mar 27 2013, 02:15 PM)
last time, they thaught Singapore would crawl back and beg Malaysia to accept them back.....cause Singapore that time just a small tiny island....with nothing
a dirty slum city, with no natural resources, no infrastructure.....even no raw water...

but they didn't realise Singapore ppl got brain and perseverance

now these type ppl, with kampong brain and mentality.  which very easy sakit hati and jealous ppl successful....that's y now bising bising want hapus Singapore....
with that mamakutty pouring oil into fire everyday...these stupid kampong mindset ppl more rage la now
*
We don't hv soverignity prob with singpore,just from economic view,we r competing each other

I guess u r the one of those who like to ignite fire and create tension
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 02:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(Weldon29 @ Mar 27 2013, 02:18 PM)
and SG jelly who?
*
SG not jelly,they threatened by presence of Iskandar Malaysia, while their island become more scarce both for population and industrial,etc there will be more refineries at pengerang that wil competing with singpore's
deswai they invested in Iskandar project quite huge too

if u can't beat them,join them
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 02:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(amir.asyraf @ Mar 27 2013, 02:22 PM)
Singapore is so small you could probably wipe them out with 2 or more B-52s provided the bombers slip through the air defenses...
*
Their 24hours surveilance planes wil detect any incoming threat either at the sea or airspace,from 500km distance,then shortly few minutes after being alerted, their fighter jets with fully loaded will be scrambled to intercept those threats

I think those threats will be annihiliated within few hours only
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 07:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(Einjahr @ Mar 27 2013, 03:48 PM)
decentralisation as to enable Malaysian states and nation-states to govern themselves without being wretched by incessant bureaucratic policies and red-tape. One such example is the Cabbotage-Policy. If done properly, it would make the value chain more efficient and increase productivity.
*
not this shit again
look at UK,is Scotland & ireland region decentralize from Great Britain?

econmy stagnant nothing todo with decentralize/centralise....its about highly capable human resources--no need to look further,its singapore & selangor(the richest state in malaysia which have nearly no natural resources at all)both singapore & selangor state highly dependant on high educted human labour to propel the economy
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 08:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(kokoronotomo @ Mar 27 2013, 07:59 PM)
our GGK doesn't even stand a chance against Sulu without the help of TUDM... against Kopassus, our GGK can only cirit birit
*
how u know that?btw even kopassus also same what
dont tell me Indon army will dismantle their airforce becoz their kopassus so powerful?can ask anyone from kopassus what will happen if no airforce to help?sp why Indon airforce keep adding their assets?kopassus not powerful meh?kopassus can setel on their own?

meh talking without brain
e36.hartge
post Mar 27 2013, 08:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(Einjahr @ Mar 27 2013, 08:20 PM)
user posted image
Does that look like one country to you ?  How can you administer a country with a unitary template when the territories aren't even share a common border even geologically? That would translate to disparity.

Whats the point of developing human resources without providing economic opportunity to east malaysia ? wouldnt that mean skilled people from Sabah and Sarawak will travel to West Malaysia and work in Selangor instead of developing their own homeland? hence continuing the cycle of inequal development?

Anyway, Malaysia shouldn't put all its eggs in one basket.
*
lolololo,scotland & ireland how compared to Great Britain?both regions so developed compared to london?
btyw can u see sumatra & kalimantan region too?indon also centralised their gov at Jakarta(Java region)..look at Sumatra & Kalimatan population also,infact kalimantan is bigger than sabah&srawak combined yet much poorer(despite bigger population & bigger natural resources)
e36.hartge
post Mar 28 2013, 09:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(kokoronotomo @ Mar 28 2013, 09:16 AM)
in your dream...Kaltim now much richer than Sabah...poor Sabah, better we give it to Suluk
*
That's the truthful fact,btw Kaltim stand for Kalimantan East region not whole Kalimantan,Kalbar for West Kalimantan

Economic growth also meaningless if the wealth not shared among people,example petrol subsidy,despite indon much bigger oil deposit especialy in Kaltim offshore and Sumatra ,the whole indon til now zero petrol subsidy

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0183sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:15 PM