QUOTE(chiiupe @ Mar 30 2013, 12:32 AM)
Anything is possible as long as it doesn't break any physics law. Then there's cost, ease of manufacturing and of course, efficiency.
Possible issues:
1) How will you control the diameter? Overcrimp?
2) More moving parts means harder and more expensive assembly
3) Needs to close faster to compete with current tools
Hence the novelty is there.Possible issues:
1) How will you control the diameter? Overcrimp?
2) More moving parts means harder and more expensive assembly
3) Needs to close faster to compete with current tools
Everything is possible and feasibility will be tested
Apr 5 2013, 12:15 AM

Quote
0.0149sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled