Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 good morning, Angel

views
     
TSHKH PHOTO
post Mar 25 2013, 11:37 AM, updated 13y ago

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
1. user posted image

2. user posted image

3. user posted image

4. user posted image

5. user posted image

6. user posted image

7. user posted image

8. user posted image

9. user posted image

10. user posted image

This post has been edited by HKH PHOTO: Apr 16 2013, 09:43 AM
[PF] T.J.
post Mar 25 2013, 11:41 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
Good morning indeed thumbup.gif
Nice shots~
shootkk
post Mar 25 2013, 03:40 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Pardon me for saying but there is nothing special about these shots. I would say that these are very cliched shots. So you get a girl in a room and shoot her around a bed wearing an oversized shirt. Where have I seen that before? Ohh... wait... I see it almost everywhere in almost every photography forum.

First off, the composition of the shots are nothing to shout about. The tilting makes it worse.

Why is it that in pic no. 4 that I can see the umbrella where your flash is mounted? Does that need to be in the pic? Shooting with the flash directed into the lens has even caused ghosting in your pic.

I'm not a fan of fish-eye or UWA shots in portraiture. I think that most times, the fish-eye/UWA takes in more than necessary and detracts from the subject. An example of this is pic #7 and #8. That horrendously distorted window frame in 7 is not doing the picture any favors and all that empty space in 8 along with all that we can see outside the window is really distracting. So in the end, the fish-eye/UWA did not work.

All in all, the model seems to be very awkward in posing and only pic #10 can it be said that the posing is acceptable.

My 2 cents.
[PF] T.J.
post Mar 25 2013, 06:21 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(shootkk @ Mar 25 2013, 03:40 PM)
Pardon me for saying but there is nothing special about these shots. I would say that these are very cliched shots. So you get a girl in a room and shoot her around a bed wearing an oversized shirt. Where have I seen that before? Ohh... wait... I see it almost everywhere in almost every photography forum.

First off, the composition of the shots are nothing to shout about. The tilting makes it worse.

Why is it that in pic no. 4 that I can see the umbrella where your flash is mounted? Does that need to be in the pic? Shooting with the flash directed into the lens has even caused ghosting in your pic.

I'm not a fan of fish-eye or UWA shots in portraiture. I think that most times, the fish-eye/UWA takes in more than necessary and detracts from the subject. An example of this is pic #7 and #8. That horrendously distorted window frame in 7 is not doing the picture any favors and all that empty space in 8 along with all that we can see outside the window is really distracting. So in the end, the fish-eye/UWA did not work.

All in all, the model seems to be very awkward in posing and only pic #10 can it be said that the posing is acceptable.

My 2 cents.
*
Man you have great eyes thumbup.gif
I can't really tell until I see your comments notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by [PF] T.J.: Mar 25 2013, 06:22 PM
whyteaz
post Mar 25 2013, 11:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: kay el
no 8 not nice....if the you could cover the window with curtain would be alot more better


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0148sec    0.72    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 11:22 AM