depends on PRU13

I think it depends on location.. If you look at location such as Puchong and Kinara area the price is on high end n it keeps rising steadily.. On the other side places like Alam Impian, Setia Alam and Denai Alam the price is kind of stagnant.. Nt too much of increase or decrease in price in recent times..

You can try looking at the recently VP'ed units such as Emerald and Sapphire... Launching price was around 700K and 6xxK.. Current asking price is 950K-1mil and 940K-980K..

The units was ready around last year May.. So basically 300K increase in 2 years ++ since launch... Not sure if tats called "healthy" appreciation?

Actually for the units tat I mentioned, Emerald from 850K went up to 970K in 7 months time period...

Actually most of the agents told me to skip Emerald as it's a waste of time dy... Because owners has started to ask 950K - 1mil now since the last  transaction..

The agents told me tat Qaseh is a better choice if u r going for 1 mil++ price tag.. Was supposed to view 1 of the cheapest unit last weekend, wic was going for 910K and suddenly the owner didn't wanted to sell the unit.. So looks like he wana join the party too..

Sapphire wic is slightly smaller by 1xx sqft is asking for 940K, if not mistaken the last few units available... so wouldn't be too surprised if asking is more than 950K on wards..

Actually I called up most of the agents, its just their stupid trick to price it lower so tat potential customer calls them juz to be informed tat the asking price has been increased...

Almost 14 years in O&G, daily rate
No medical, no bonus, no tax

Tea boy

This's good news

I only spot this:-

“Households with incomes less than RM3000 (a month) and below are increasingly over-leveraging, borrowing not for assets like houses or cars, but taking up personal loans."

and this:-

"Speaking after presenting BNM’s annual report at its headquarters in Kuala Lumpur, she said that lower income households only make up 11 percent of the portfolios of commercial banks."

Correct me if I'm wrong on the following calculation....
140% Debts/Disposable Household Income
If Mr Z debt amt 300,000
Disposable Income = 300,000/1.4 = 214,285 (Annual income after Tax)
Mr Z monthly income = 214,285/12 = 17,857 (after tax)
300,000 monthly payment est 1,500, I'll round off to 2,000
Mr Z income for other expenses after debt payment monthly = 17,857 - 2,000 = 15,857

I'm not into economic study or whatsoever, jus wonder anything wrong on my calculation?     

And this does not included or concern on assets value too right? If the asset value 1,000,000 now?   

Can I ask a stupid question? Hypothetically - what if the crash really happens, and market value slump by 30%,
- What the rich with holding power will do?
- What will the middle income fully leveraged will do?
- What will the down camp will do - for middle income group with average savings?
- Life goes on for the poor?

Market not gonna slump until all the down camp starts buying... so buy more... but more.. guaranteed road to eternal wealth. 

Guys, a boss of mine said if opposition wins, property investment will collapse. Agree? I dont coz i think the market drives it. Government has a bit influence but mainly market