the experts quoted RM70k wor.... i think it's a joke.

key word... RM700k.
the more important key word... prime location somemore with RM700k pricetag.

so RM700k and above properties in not prime location consider what???

common layman thinking such as myself.
say illicit funds due to corruption is RM50billion/year (presently).
IF, say fuel subsidy cap at RM20bil/year, reduction in COLLECTION of excise duty from car purchase at RM10bil/year, BR1Ms, etc at RM10bil/year, etc....
we should still save RM10bil/year, right?

if i have RM10mil to spend.
if an original cost to contract a job is RM1mil. and if it is really contracted at RM1mil instead of beefed up figure of say RM10mil. There goes a saving of RM9mil instantly. so instead of using my budget of rm10mil to undertake one task only, i now have balance of rm9mil to either carry out more task or 'subsidise' other items.

wishful thinking lah.... but still pray and wish and hope lor...

wishlist:
VW passat!

1,000,000 units over 5 years.
200,000 units per year
545 units to be launched everyday to fulfill quota.
dream on....

are we a growing nation or shrinking nation in terms of population?
do some research on the term growth population to understand better.

then do some research in terms of the supply.
the data available for supply, does it include:
1. soho?
2. sohai, soxo, sofo, sovo, etc?

previous supply sizes versus current supply sizes and its capacity to undertake the number of occupants.

we need to learn how to interpret reports and unfortunately many reports lacks key explanations on their databases.

Dont be so bad lah. Give him a break.

Wah.... batu caves interchange is a very good option for amara buyers.
Serdang and mines purchasers also stand to gain handsomely if this line is true.

the more gomen spend, the smaller our ringgit becomes.
don't forget, the next few days after election, it was reported that bijan propose to go ahead with his transformation plan costing 1 trillion ringgit. where do you think the $$$ is coming from?
you and me lah. kekeke.
let's see when can we become the next zimbabwe and all of us becomes instant multi millionaires

both stocks and property would have extreme sucess cases and also failure cases.

joe might earn a decent 9% x 4 x 3 = 108% return. but 108% return based on consistently achieving 9% roi 4 times a year for three straight years.

worgen's scenario is based on 300k to 600k. 100% return in 3 years. but if recalculated based on cash down, it's 300k/30k = 1000% return.

but of course, there are cases of stocks gaining >30% in a day too.

mr. accountant, mind sharing how you derive the 55% profit and duration of 15 months?
or the attachment has got nothing to do with your posting?
not well verse with shares. please share share, k?

boss, while your scenario maybe quite realistic and achievable, but who's to say worgen's scenario might be equally possible as well.
when i illustrated the scenario, i was assuming that a stock investor would be consistently realising 9% gain each quarter for three years straight.
while not impossible but no easy feat as well.

assuming worgen's scenario was flawed and 300k gross profit is now reduced to say 90k net profit. that would still give a 300% return. and over 3 years cocr, it's still 100%.

of course chances of stocks getting burnt and property getting abandon is still there for both scenarios lah.

btw, rpgt? i think most investors would gladly pay. that only means they are making money.
early settlement penalty? some has it, some don't. again, it's only a percentage of the loan amount. can i treat it as % commission to brokers?
interests cost? again it's a small percentage. and if there's DIBS, there goes the cost.
S&P, agent fee, etc. yes. agreed. must pay. hence reduce gross profit to net profit.

again, am not advocating which is better, which is not.
most super wealthy people made their millions from shares, and not properties.
warren definitely did so.

funny... i always thought monitoring shares movement is more stressful and time consuming compared to monitoring properties investment.
guess i am wrong.

no problem with me being wrong.
only problem is you can't or won't answer a question i post to you earlier.
not wrong for me to ask. and certainly not wrong for you to decline help to those who requested.

so are you are happy being wrong?

boss if you define like that, i am also DDD camp liao lor.

i nvr say i am uuu camp wor.

those who think property prices going down, don't exactly have a reason to buy, right? else he might as well throw their money into the deep blue sea.
those who think property prices going up, may choose to sell to realise profit and leave some on the table for the next batch of people.

bye bye and see you in next thread.

no right nor wrong.
same answers to would you dispose a loss making company stock in a super bullish market?

if everybody is in agreement, there would not need to be a discussion, right?

but in short, yes i would buy. but then again, so many stocks are undervalued.

rooney boss, auctions are happening everyday.
be it >rm1mil or <RM60k.
our good bukit tak beruntung still have units going for much less.

so question is, while from your end, high end auction units list are growing, is low end list growing as well?

guess with joe boss' explanation, uuu camp nor ddd camp doesn't matter.
everybody is trying to distort the definition already. kekeke.

btw, who came up with the above explanation wor?

hhhmmmm..... tricky.
i would rather pay attention to the median group rather than the high end group.
if shit hits the fan, i would be worried sick if defaulters are mainly from mid pricing.
high end wise i wouldn't be too worried about defaulters. (for many a reasons)
you know and i know the purchasers of >RM1mil group consists of a whole group of people and with various intentions of their purchases.