sorry guys...
i think u have all got it wrong...
there is no such thing as allu being beter at dissipating heat than copper
it is just a myth that alot of ppl spread.
pure copper vs aluminum heatsink, which is better?
pure copper vs aluminum heatsink, which is better?
|
|
Jun 9 2006, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Senior Member
171 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
sorry guys...
i think u have all got it wrong... there is no such thing as allu being beter at dissipating heat than copper it is just a myth that alot of ppl spread. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2006, 02:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Senior Member
171 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(SeLrAhC @ Jun 9 2006, 02:07 AM) It doesnt need an engineer to know about material science and thermodynamics....and not all engineers know about material science and thermodynamics... but because of your inquisitiveness....yes I am an engineer and yes i did material science. And i havent came across anything that says radiation of heat is based on material. The only variables are surface area, temperature difference, colour .... Now try proving me wrong......Il be glad if you do |
|
|
Jun 11 2006, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Senior Member
171 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(Westley @ Jun 11 2006, 12:33 PM) IHS, dunno, but some said copper please bare in mind that there is no dissipation characteristic of a material....DIE, the die is using silicon + gemanium. this two semiconductor making the wafer for all die. ram is different bcause the packaging. about thermo, heat dispassion rate is an important factor. copper may absorb 400W/mk of energy, but how fast does it release? yet we may see the comparison of xp-90 and xp90c. i hope that may get a chance to test it, using different airflow and air pressure. i believe that is the heatsink is good, it does not need to be full copper. combination of copper + alu is great enough. about nickel 90.9 W/(m·K) thermal conductivity and 13.4 µm/(m·K) thermal expansion but there is thermal conductivity and specific heat.. try to ponder on it....and youll get the idea |
|
|
Jun 13 2006, 12:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Senior Member
171 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
QUOTE(MetalZone @ Jun 11 2006, 10:43 PM) Aleck as always, the WC guru. nicely explained...There is no such thing as difference in heat absorbsion and heat dissipation. Thermal conductivity is thermal conductivity as it is, regardless in absorbing heat or releasing heat. Given 2 heat sinks with exactly the same design....one copper and the other allu. The copper one will always be supperior except that it will be 3 times heavier But ussualy we cant get exactly the same design when using copper or allu due the fact that both goes through different manufacturing processes. U can easily find an allu hs made from a single chunk(extrution) but it would be rare to find a cooper hs made out of a single chunk of copper. They need to solder the fins to a base to get the surface area hence creating thermal junctions that hampers the conduction of heat. Same goes to allu and copper radiators. Allu radiators are far more superior than their copper counter parts because the manufacturing process and technology of brazing allu radiators are far beter than brazing copper rads. Copper rads usses tin as its brazing filler and this creates alot of thermal junctions. Where else allu does not need foreign material as a filler but melts and clings together by itself at <400deg with the help of some brazing flux |
| Change to: | 0.0138sec
0.52
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:31 PM |