Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Car Resale Values, Fact or Myth?

views
     
812799
post Mar 20 2013, 12:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
836 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Mar 8 2013, 09:21 AM)
This calculation was shared by a LYN forumer some time back which ive tweaked to suit.

Very often, we always focus on the resale value of a particular model while ignoring the start up costs and monthly loan repayment costs. This tabulation will show you why cars with lower resale value may actually be a cheaper. This is of course assuming maintenance costs are similar.

Peugeot 407 Premium 2.0L

Purchase price (2008) = $136,888
Downpayment = $13,688 (10%)
Interest rate = 3%
Tenure = 60 months (5 years)
Monthly loan payment = $2,361
Total loan paid = $2361 x 60 = $141679
Total paid for car = $141679 (loan) + $13688 (dp)= $155,367
Resell car 2013 (after 5 years) for $70k (49% loss)
Total loss (after 5 years) = $155,367 (what you paid for) - $70,000 (what you get) = $85,367
Toyota Camry 2.0L

Purchase price (2008) = $154,990
Downpayment = $15,499
Interest rate = 3%
Tenure = 60 months (5 years)
Monthly payment = $2,673
Total loan paid = $2,673 x 60 = $160,414
Total paid for car = $160,414 + $15,499 = $175,913
Resell car 2013 (after 5 years) for $100k (35% loss)
Total loss (after 5 years) = $175913 (what you paid for) - $100,000 (what you get) = $75,913

For simplicity, let's assume service/maintenance costs are equal. Thus, after 5 years, a Peugeot 407 vs Toyota Camry:

407 has HIGHER total loss
$85,367 (407) - $75,913 (Camry) = $9,454

407 has LOWER start-up cost
$15,499 (camry) - $13,688 (407) = $1,811

407 has HIGHER monthly positive cash flow through lower installments
$2,673 (camry) - $2,361 (407) x 60 months = $ 18,720
SUMMARY

This clearly shows that although the Peugeot 407 has RM 9,454 lower trade in value after 5 years but it gains a total of RM 20,531 from lower start up costs and lower monthly loan installments.

Thus, buying cars with lower resale value isnt actually a poor financial decision. So i think with this, we should not allow resale values to govern our choice of vehicles. Safety, value for money, specifications and maintenance costs should take precedence.

What do you think?
*
Nice one cybermaster, LOL they don't get your meaning of the RM20 531.
812799
post Mar 20 2013, 09:08 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
836 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


QUOTE(zib5 @ Mar 20 2013, 12:50 AM)
another conclusion is Camry is overpriced with inferior specs than 407.

So Toyota needs to buck up and lower your prices.

Don't keep blaming taxes or Japan HQ.
*
the conclusion is talking about cash flow within money spent and in 5 yrs time ...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0201sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 10:16 PM