Unifi Sabah-Sarawak UNIFI Thread, Free until Dec 24month contract promo
|
|
 Sep 7 2019, 11:53 AM
|
 
Newbie
32 posts Joined: Oct 2018 
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Sep 5 2019, 04:46 PM) Edit: a TM user in the same city as me can get 90~100Mbps to US on 100Mbps plan. So the possible explanation of Sarawak or 100Mbps users being limited in bandwidth internationally as a reason for not reaching subscribed speeds is invalid. Thank you very much! This is what I want to know! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2019, 12:07 PM
|
|
Newbie
32 posts Joined: Oct 2018
|
To those with hiccups, connection drops, etc in Sabah/Sarawak..
I have this same experiences occasionally when using direct connection. I now re-route all connections to Europe through Mumbai via VPN server and.. I have not the fastest connection through VPN only 20Mbps via Mumbai but it's stable and I use backup system to backup all my data from here to servers in EU, Russia over this connection: 100+GB on a day and no drops or issues. When I connect directly from KL to Europe I also get drops, lost connection, etc. But it is weird, as my friends in KL direct connection to Europe have 100Mbps and on top of that extreme stable! btw you can all compare connections using tracert goto windows and type in: tracert google.co.uk or tracert nyt.com or any server located in US or EU to find about how international connections being routed. You can specify IPv4 or IPv6 but I always use IPv4 only especially to avoid DNS leaks In linux you can do this as well: https://www.computerhope.com/unix/utracero.htm Would be interesting if we all post where we are located: mainland MY, Sabah, Sarawak and then tracert for example: tracert 151.101.1.164 (California) tracert 157.159.10.207 (Paris) tracert 72.229.28.185 (New York) tracert 103.15.170.110 (London) CODE // Clearly this goes to a mirror in Singapore and not over the ocean. Tracing route to 151.101.1.164 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.22.64.1 2 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms 58.71.245.62 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 39 ms 32 ms 31 ms 58.71.243.49 5 * 32 ms * 58.71.244.246 6 57 ms 32 ms 32 ms 58.71.241.105 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 55 ms 41 ms 41 ms 202.122.151.30 9 37 ms 37 ms 37 ms 54113.sgw.equinix.com [27.111.228.34] 10 37 ms 36 ms 37 ms 151.101.1.164 Trace complete. CODE // Clearly this goes through Japan, USA and then to Europe (VERY WEIRD to route 3/4 over the planet instead of 1/4) tracert 157.159.10.207 Tracing route to 157.159.10.207 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.22.64.1 2 45 ms 31 ms 31 ms 58.71.245.62 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 31 ms 31 ms 30 ms 58.71.243.49 5 * * 32 ms 58.71.244.246 6 40 ms 38 ms 31 ms 58.71.241.105 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms 172.22.144.146 10 34 ms 32 ms 29 ms ae-9.r20.kslrml02.my.bb.gin.ntt.net [203.78.193.237] 11 76 ms 76 ms 75 ms ae-3.r25.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.195] 12 117 ms 118 ms 118 ms ae-7.r24.osakjp02.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.42] 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 205 ms 206 ms 206 ms ae-11.r04.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.6] 15 217 ms 218 ms 217 ms ae7.cr4-sea2.ip4.gtt.net [199.229.231.89] 16 336 ms 335 ms 336 ms et-3-3-0.cr4-par7.ip4.gtt.net [213.200.119.214] 17 335 ms 331 ms 331 ms renater-gw-ix1.gtt.net [77.67.123.206] 18 345 ms 344 ms 344 ms te1-1-orsay-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.177.120] 19 342 ms 341 ms 342 ms te1-1-evry-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.177.102] 20 347 ms 347 ms 346 ms reve-gi8-1-evry-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.181.221] 21 351 ms 349 ms 350 ms 195.83.166.162 22 332 ms 333 ms 332 ms int-50-g.reve.fr [194.57.241.204] 23 345 ms 348 ms 345 ms 157.159.8.2 24 335 ms 335 ms 335 ms 157.159.10.207 Trace complete. CODE tracert 72.229.28.185 Tracing route to cpe-72-229-28-185.nyc.res.rr.com [72.229.28.185] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.22.64.1 2 31 ms 31 ms 30 ms 58.71.245.62 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms 58.71.243.49 5 32 ms 31 ms * 58.71.244.246 6 31 ms 31 ms 62 ms 58.71.241.105 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 41 ms 42 ms 41 ms gi0-2.shtp-pe704.maxis.net.my [202.122.151.198] 9 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 203.208.148.213 10 37 ms 37 ms 37 ms 203.208.152.82 11 207 ms 208 ms 208 ms 203.208.153.162 12 211 ms 212 ms 211 ms 0.xe-8-3-0.pr0.sjc20.tbone.rr.com [66.109.11.137] 13 296 ms 292 ms 293 ms bu-ether14.snvacaid17w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com [66.109.6.138] 14 288 ms 292 ms 293 ms bu-ether14.chcgildt87w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com [66.109.6.15] 15 289 ms 294 ms 294 ms bu-ether17.atlngamq47w-bcr01.tbone.rr.com [66.109.6.94] 16 294 ms 292 ms 294 ms agg2.nyquny9101r.nyc.rr.com [107.14.19.23] 17 300 ms 299 ms 300 ms agg1.nycynymy02h.nyc.rr.com [68.173.198.43] 18 287 ms 287 ms 288 ms agg2.nycynymy10m.nyc.rr.com [68.173.202.103] 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 363 ms 310 ms 313 ms cpe-72-229-28-185.nyc.res.rr.com [72.229.28.185] Trace complete. CODE // clearly this one is much faster as the one to Paris! This one goes from Singapore straight to UK tracert 103.15.170.110 Tracing route to ei-web03.ash2.squiz.cloud [103.15.170.110] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.22.64.1 2 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms 58.71.245.62 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 31 ms 32 ms 31 ms 58.71.243.49 5 31 ms 31 ms * 58.71.244.246 6 68 ms 56 ms 36 ms 58.71.241.105 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 * * * Request timed out. 9 32 ms 32 ms 33 ms 172.22.144.146 10 30 ms 34 ms 29 ms ae-9.r20.kslrml02.my.bb.gin.ntt.net [203.78.193.237] 11 34 ms 34 ms 33 ms ae-1.r21.kslrml02.my.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.7.43] 12 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms ae-8.r21.sngpsi07.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.168] 13 193 ms 192 ms 192 ms ae-8.r24.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.7.64] 14 193 ms 192 ms 194 ms ae-1.r04.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.126] 15 209 ms 210 ms 209 ms ae-0.a00.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.136] 16 206 ms 206 ms 206 ms 81.25.207.166 17 204 ms 204 ms 203 ms v900.thn-br1.orbital.net [80.88.212.56] 18 194 ms 194 ms 194 ms 203.88.80.arpa.orbital.net [80.88.203.6] 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 276 ms 276 ms 285 ms ei-web03.ash2.squiz.cloud [103.15.170.110] Trace complete. So in all cases I'm using the Sistem Kabel Rakyat 1Malaysia (SKR1M) always. Then on Mainland the infrastructure is extreme bad! CODE 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 172.22.64.1 2 31 ms 31 ms 30 ms 58.71.245.62 3 * * * Request timed out. 4 31 ms 31 ms 31 ms 58.71.243.49 5 32 ms 31 ms * 58.71.244.246 6 31 ms 31 ms 62 ms 58.71.241.105 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 41 ms 42 ms 41 ms gi0-2.shtp-pe704.maxis.net.my [202.122.151.198] Why so many hops? My previous fiber internet providers (yes I had several already in various countries) I had 1: my own router 2: was already the ISP outbound .. that's it.. hop 2 was already non-ISP internet. Why 8 hops in Malaysia? Don't know, but very ineffective that's for sure! Anyway, from there the connection to USA and Paris are using the Asia Pacific Gateway (APG) Why to Paris the Asia Pacific Gateway (APG)??? Doesn't make sense, total garbage to use that cable to get to Paris Followed by the Japan-U.S. Cable Network (JUS) and then if going further than USA to Europe the FLAG Atlantic-1 (FA-1) but when I going to London.. MUCH faster and more efficient.. We go from KL to Singapore and then SeaMeWe-5 followed by a connection I haven't been able to identify. FThis is faster and more efficient.. But also not optimal!!! Connections Malaysia to Europe (France, London) could be done by either: Asia Africa Europe-1 (AAE-1) or FLAG Europe-Asia (FEA) but both TM and Maxis don't use this. Although that's a DIRECT CONNECTION from KL to Europe!!!!! If I wish I could ask someone at TM or Maxis and pay them 100RM a month just to get routed over these cables.. my speed would be 100+ Mbps to Europe A technician friend told me it's contracts they make. They make cheap contracts and use the cheapest solution and if routing via via is cheaper than direct connection you get the less good connection simply because its cheaper but large corporations they pay more and get the fast connections. So I really wish if this were an option for end-consumers as well? Pay more for better connections? This post has been edited by mrgenie: Sep 7 2019, 12:30 PM |
|
|
Sep 7 2019, 01:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1543
|
|
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Apr 2018
|
QUOTE(mrgenie @ Sep 7 2019, 12:07 PM) Would be interesting if we all post where we are located: Tried one, here's results from main city of Sarawak (first two IP edited for privacy):mainland MY, Sabah, Sarawak and then tracert for example: tracert 151.101.1.164 (California) tracert 157.159.10.207 (Paris) tracert 72.229.28.185 (New York) tracert 103.15.170.110 (London) CODE tracert 157.159.10.207 Tracing route to 157.159.10.207 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.xxxx.com [192.xxx.xxx.xxx] 2 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 118.xxx.xxx.xxx 3 35 ms 32 ms 34 ms 10.55.170.119 4 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms 10.55.39.160 5 26 ms 24 ms 24 ms 10.55.100.126 6 33 ms 33 ms 32 ms 10.55.209.17 7 32 ms 33 ms 32 ms 100ge10-2.core1.sin1.he.net [74.82.46.49] 8 170 ms 169 ms 169 ms 100ge11-1.core1.mrs1.he.net [184.105.65.14] 9 176 ms 186 ms 179 ms 100ge4-2.core1.par2.he.net [184.105.222.21] 10 180 ms 179 ms 179 ms renater.equinix-ix.fr [195.42.145.38] 11 181 ms 181 ms 182 ms xe1-0-1-paris1-rtr-131.noc.renater.fr [193.51.177.128] 12 177 ms 178 ms 177 ms te4-3-orsay-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.177.229] 13 179 ms 178 ms 180 ms te1-1-evry-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.177.102] 14 181 ms 182 ms 181 ms reve-gi8-1-evry-rtr-021.noc.renater.fr [193.51.181.221] 15 181 ms 181 ms 181 ms 195.83.166.162 16 178 ms 178 ms 178 ms int-50-g.reve.fr [194.57.241.204] 17 179 ms 178 ms 178 ms 157.159.8.2 18 179 ms 178 ms 178 ms 157.159.10.207 Trace complete. Looks like less hops than yours. Ok, here's another one: CODE tracert 103.15.170.110 Tracing route to ei-web03.ash2.squiz.cloud [103.15.170.110] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.xxxx.com [192.xxx.xxx.xxx] 2 4 ms 1 ms 1 ms 118.xxx.xxx.xxx 3 217 ms 213 ms 213 ms 10.55.170.119 4 217 ms 221 ms 215 ms 10.55.39.162 5 25 ms 27 ms 25 ms 10.55.100.122 6 212 ms 212 ms 212 ms 10.55.192.125 7 212 ms 212 ms 212 ms et-0-0-19-2.cr5-sjc1.ip4.gtt.net [69.174.14.189] 8 348 ms 348 ms 348 ms xe-5-3-5.cr1-lon1.ip4.gtt.net [89.149.137.205] 9 348 ms 347 ms 347 ms xe2-2-ve-81.thn-pe-2.thn.thebunker.net [46.33.90.22] 10 279 ms 280 ms 279 ms squiz.1224.cr-1.ash.thebunker.net [93.91.16.189] 11 279 ms 280 ms 279 ms 93.91.16.190 12 282 ms 285 ms 282 ms 10.10.1.10 13 280 ms 280 ms 282 ms ei-web03.ash2.squiz.cloud [103.15.170.110] Trace complete. Local sites for comparison: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « To Cloudflare only few hops. 1: My router 2: TM gateway 3-5: TM network 6: Cloudflare network 7: Cloudflare DNS server Looks like for local sites only 4 hops in TM network while international sites 5 hops. Additional info: I do not notice any issues here in the past few days. An article that may be of interest to some: Cloudflare | The Relative Cost of Bandwidth Around the World This post has been edited by AV_2018: Sep 7 2019, 02:45 PM |
|
|
Sep 10 2019, 06:08 PM
|
Senior Member
6,381 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: meow meow
|
any tm agents with connection to tm planning @ Simpang 3, Kuching? I was told all criterias met including technical and demand but planning dept still no answer.
A lot demands already, even the tmpoint staff showed the list and admit my area should already have installed unifi.. if someone or any agent can push for coverage.. kindly pm me.. who knows the commisions tm unifi installation for whole taman maybe yours makan if can push coverage.. This post has been edited by GameSky: Sep 10 2019, 06:29 PM |
|
|
Sep 10 2019, 07:06 PM
|
Senior Member
4,480 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: The capital of Soviet Sarawak - Pusak City  
|
QUOTE(GameSky @ Sep 10 2019, 06:08 PM) any tm agents with connection to tm planning @ Simpang 3, Kuching? I was told all criterias met including technical and demand but planning dept still no answer. tweet communication minister A lot demands already, even the tmpoint staff showed the list and admit my area should already have installed unifi.. if someone or any agent can push for coverage.. kindly pm me.. who knows the commisions tm unifi installation for whole taman maybe yours makan if can push coverage..  |
|
|
Sep 10 2019, 07:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
6,381 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: meow meow
|
QUOTE(kopitiam @ Sep 10 2019, 07:06 PM) tweet communication minister lol need big cable |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2019, 10:19 AM
|
|
Newbie
32 posts Joined: Oct 2018
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Sep 7 2019, 01:36 PM) Tried one, here's results from main city of Sarawak (first two IP edited for privacy): Thank you AV_2018.Yes yours goes via Sing to Hong Kong and then the sea cable from HK to Marseille around the Indian subcontinent which is 60% shorter then my connection. My connection clearly goes to Japan and then through the USA. If the timezone are kinda equally distributed the way from Southeast Asia to Europe is 25% of the globe. But across the pacific through the USA is 75% of the globe. I know distances in reality are not exact because of the curve of the earth compared to the earth map. But clearly NOT going across the pacific to Europe is shorter and thus less latency. So I really don't understand why my ISP (maxis) sends the signals across the pacific through the USA. You have thus a much better connection, that's for sure! |
|
|
Sep 19 2019, 05:52 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1548
|
|
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Just simple question, my unifi800 can only get about 500-600Mbps @TMspeedtest via wired cat6 lan. Is this normal? My pc is fairly recent, i5, 8gb ram & ssd c drive. I've tried disabling anti-virus also. Ping is about 40ms
This post has been edited by anon5391: Sep 19 2019, 05:53 PM |
|
|
Sep 19 2019, 06:11 PM
|
|
Junior Member
422 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(anon5391 @ Sep 19 2019, 05:52 PM) Just simple question, my unifi800 can only get about 500-600Mbps @TMspeedtest via wired cat6 lan. Is this normal? My pc is fairly recent, i5, 8gb ram & ssd c drive. I've tried disabling anti-virus also. Ping is about 40ms Ur cat6 lan cable how long ?Ping value is from tm speed test , right ? I am using cat5e 20 meters lan cable.The lan cable is cheap and poor quality type.  Anyway, my tm speed test ping is 5,6 or 7 ms .jitter is 1 or 2 ms most of the time. After long cable run , i think the result is quite good. |
|
|
Sep 19 2019, 06:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1550
|
|
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Apr 2018
|
QUOTE(anon5391 @ Sep 19 2019, 05:52 PM) Just simple question, my unifi800 can only get about 500-600Mbps @TMspeedtest via wired cat6 lan. Is this normal? My pc is fairly recent, i5, 8gb ram & ssd c drive. I've tried disabling anti-virus also. Ping is about 40ms Normal for Sarawak is this 7th gen Core i5, 8GB RAM, SSD, Firefox, Windows Defender, Cat6 throughout, Asus router If using TM Speedtest, ping 19ms, jitter 1ms This post has been edited by AV_2018: Sep 19 2019, 06:18 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2019, 09:51 AM
|
Senior Member
2,348 posts Joined: Apr 2008
|
QUOTE(anon5391 @ Sep 19 2019, 05:52 PM) Just simple question, my unifi800 can only get about 500-600Mbps @TMspeedtest via wired cat6 lan. Is this normal? My pc is fairly recent, i5, 8gb ram & ssd c drive. I've tried disabling anti-virus also. Ping is about 40ms Do not using local speedtest server, use http://speedtest.tm.com.my/Local server such as Danawa Resources, i-Skill Dynamics are all sucks server with very high 50ms ping. |
|
|
Sep 20 2019, 10:52 AM
|
|
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(junclj @ Sep 20 2019, 09:51 AM) Do not using local speedtest server, use http://speedtest.tm.com.my/ Thanks for the replies guys. My concern is about not able to get 800mbps (wired cat6 3meters only). I don't really care about the high ping (i'm not online gamer)Local server such as Danawa Resources, i-Skill Dynamics are all sucks server with very high 50ms ping. |
|
|
Sep 20 2019, 02:56 PM
|
Senior Member
1,878 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(junclj @ Sep 20 2019, 09:51 AM) Do not using local speedtest server, use http://speedtest.tm.com.my/ What is the point of using TM's own in house speed test server for testing only? This is unless you want a useless LAN network?Local server such as Danawa Resources, i-Skill Dynamics are all sucks server with very high 50ms ping. For an internet user of course you want good all round speed for everywhere possible including each continent such as USA, Europe, Africa or North Asia. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 20 2019, 03:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,348 posts Joined: Apr 2008
|
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Sep 20 2019, 02:56 PM) What is the point of using TM's own in house speed test server for testing only? This is unless you want a useless LAN network? Because Unifi is repeatered directly from west Malaysia. We do not have main station in East Malaysia here. All the fiber internet connections are repeatered directly from KL there. If you change your speedtest server to Kuala Lumpur, Petaling Jaya, Cyberjaya etc. You will notice that the ping is 20~30s+, but when you switch your speedtest server to Kuching, Kota Kinabalu, the ping is 50s~60s. Because the Danawa Kuching server need to send back to west Malaysia(TM Unifi) first then receive again(your PC) from west Malaysia. Did double jobs, ping was get doubled. Just the 3,800KM SKR1M submarine cable already wasted 30ms ping. Two round send and return then get 60ms already. Two times charged on ping. So why don't just switch directly to KL server to do speedtest?For an internet user of course you want good all round speed for everywhere possible including each continent such as USA, Europe, Africa or North Asia. Unless lah, TM is setting up a separate optical fiber station in East Malaysia here. So we do not need to change speedtest server to KL. Just straight test with local server will get 0~1ms. This post has been edited by junclj: Sep 20 2019, 04:22 PM |
|
|
Sep 20 2019, 07:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1555
|
|
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Apr 2018
|
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Sep 20 2019, 02:56 PM) What is the point of using TM's own in house speed test server for testing only? This is unless you want a useless LAN network? Many big companies have or are using CDNs/mirrors/datacentres located in KL or Singapore. It is possible to get 20ms latency and up to 70MB/s download speeds from these services which means the speedtest results are not useless.For an internet user of course you want good all round speed for everywhere possible including each continent such as USA, Europe, Africa or North Asia. QUOTE(junclj @ Sep 20 2019, 03:52 PM) Unless lah, TM is setting up a separate optical fiber station in East Malaysia here. So we do not need to change speedtest server to KL. Just straight test with local server will get 0~1ms. Testing latency to another TM user in East Malaysia can get <1ms result.This post has been edited by AV_2018: Sep 20 2019, 08:01 PM |
|
|
Sep 23 2019, 10:56 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,878 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Sep 20 2019, 07:59 PM) Many big companies have or are using CDNs/mirrors/datacentres located in KL or Singapore. It is possible to get 20ms latency and up to 70MB/s download speeds from these services which means the speedtest results are not useless. Why not just do the speedtests to these Singapore datacentres or CDNs directly then? See what kind of latency you get? Direct from Kuala Lumpur here my FTTH line can get pings below <10ms to local servers, less than <15ms to SG servers.Testing latency to another TM user in East Malaysia can get <1ms result. |
|
|
Sep 24 2019, 12:33 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1557
|
|
Junior Member
451 posts Joined: Apr 2018
|
QUOTE(Candy12 @ Sep 23 2019, 10:56 PM) Why not just do the speedtests to these Singapore datacentres or CDNs directly then? See what kind of latency you get? Direct from Kuala Lumpur here my FTTH line can get pings below <10ms to local servers, less than <15ms to SG servers. I mean KL/SG speedtests servers vs some far away country in general. I usually test using any KL or SG server and get almost similar results including TM's server. |
|
|
Sep 25 2019, 08:22 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,348 posts Joined: Apr 2008
|
QUOTE(AV_2018 @ Sep 20 2019, 07:59 PM) Many big companies have or are using CDNs/mirrors/datacentres located in KL or Singapore. It is possible to get 20ms latency and up to 70MB/s download speeds from these services which means the speedtest results are not useless. Can you tell me which East Malaysia Unifi user can get <1ms? I can guarantee you can't find anyone of them because all of them who can get <1ms are West Malaysians (or East Malaysian who are moved to KL).Testing latency to another TM user in East Malaysia can get <1ms result. This post has been edited by junclj: Sep 25 2019, 08:23 AM |
|
|
Sep 25 2019, 08:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,878 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(junclj @ Sep 25 2019, 08:22 AM) Can you tell me which East Malaysia Unifi user can get <1ms? I can guarantee you can't find anyone of them because all of them who can get <1ms are West Malaysians (or East Malaysian who are moved to KL). It's all about server distance and proximity when you already have fibre. Hops are less.Even better if you want excellent pings, move right into Singapore. You are probably 1-2 hops away from the content server since they're so centralized. |
|
|
Sep 25 2019, 09:05 AM
|
Senior Member
3,130 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
My main usage is Netflix and was very satisfied with my Unifi 100Mbps for the past 10 months since installed.
But, for the past 1 month, TM decided to throttle my Netflix streaming at night and the quality fluctuate between 480p and 720p, occasionnaly get 1080p for few minutes and can forget about 4K on my Sony 4K TV and Apple TV 4K. When test speed with Fast and Speedtest app, it's always show almost full speed of 100Mbps. Restart router numerous time but each time will only improved for a very short time. Very frustrating, any advise on this ? I know by reporting this issue to Netflix and TM will only make them blame each other without any solution. |
| Change to: |  0.0305sec
 0.77
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 11:18 AM |
Quote