QUOTE(springfall @ May 3 2013, 01:24 PM)
Guess who came back home from International national Service
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
maybe this would help
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Picture review
1_Battery_Front
[attachmentid=3422443]
2_Battery_Back
[attachmentid=3422444]
3_Battery_In
[attachmentid=3422445]
4_Battery_Side
[attachmentid=3422447]
5_Battery_Top
[attachmentid=3422448]
6_Battery_Bottom
[attachmentid=3422449]
Constant_Variable
[attachmentid=3422450]
Variable_1_Stock_battery
[attachmentid=3422451]
Variable_2_Polar_Bear
[attachmentid=3422452]
Variable_3_Polar_and_Stock
[attachmentid=3422453]
Variable_4_Sock_and_Polar
[attachmentid=3422454]
Mailed in within 2 weeks (end of 2nd week biz day)
Initial review show that yes a polar bear can be squished into the nexus,
pressing the back cover with polar bear inserted feels the same as putting the stock battery.
Built quality feels the same, but there are some differences:
-Major difference is the 2 extra holes (2 breath?) indicated with red marking on picture.
-The cutting of the 4 connectors, not as cleanly cut as the stock
-Welding points (on the top 2 edges) on the stock battery is not present on the polar bear
-Minor difference is the wrapping cover is reversed (still show Polar Bear when placed in nexus)
-Wrapping bottom has 2 buckle wraps (to hold the base?), have no idea why.
-Pulling the edges does not move as much as stock, meaning NFC transplant to polar bear may be harder.
Slotting in feels the same, with equal tightness
Not visible to the eye, there are elevation differences between the stock and White bear
-Stock butt is higher than the bear (NFC?)
For now this is the review, the accurate battery testing will take 1 week
and first time testing will be published on sunday or 2morrow.
quite busy to arrive at this time, assignments due!!
Currently, it was mailed in with bubble wrap!!
time to pop some for now~
Questions, pop em here~
Question 1: Why your picture quality so bad??» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
maybe this would help
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Picture review
1_Battery_Front
[attachmentid=3422443]
2_Battery_Back
[attachmentid=3422444]
3_Battery_In
[attachmentid=3422445]
4_Battery_Side
[attachmentid=3422447]
5_Battery_Top
[attachmentid=3422448]
6_Battery_Bottom
[attachmentid=3422449]
Constant_Variable
[attachmentid=3422450]
Variable_1_Stock_battery
[attachmentid=3422451]
Variable_2_Polar_Bear
[attachmentid=3422452]
Variable_3_Polar_and_Stock
[attachmentid=3422453]
Variable_4_Sock_and_Polar
[attachmentid=3422454]
Mailed in within 2 weeks (end of 2nd week biz day)
Initial review show that yes a polar bear can be squished into the nexus,
pressing the back cover with polar bear inserted feels the same as putting the stock battery.
Built quality feels the same, but there are some differences:
-Major difference is the 2 extra holes (2 breath?) indicated with red marking on picture.
-The cutting of the 4 connectors, not as cleanly cut as the stock
-Welding points (on the top 2 edges) on the stock battery is not present on the polar bear
-Minor difference is the wrapping cover is reversed (still show Polar Bear when placed in nexus)
-Wrapping bottom has 2 buckle wraps (to hold the base?), have no idea why.
-Pulling the edges does not move as much as stock, meaning NFC transplant to polar bear may be harder.
Slotting in feels the same, with equal tightness
Not visible to the eye, there are elevation differences between the stock and White bear
-Stock butt is higher than the bear (NFC?)
For now this is the review, the accurate battery testing will take 1 week
and first time testing will be published on sunday or 2morrow.
quite busy to arrive at this time, assignments due!!
Currently, it was mailed in with bubble wrap!!
time to pop some for now~
Questions, pop em here~
Question 2: Don't understand that constant/variable thingy. Explain please???
May 3 2013, 01:59 PM



Quote
0.0284sec
0.70
6 queries
GZIP Disabled