Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 104 105 106 107 108 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 NVIDIA GeForce Community V11, World Leader in Visual Computing Tech

views
     
kmarc
post Jun 23 2013, 06:55 AM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(arslow @ Jun 22 2013, 07:54 PM)
The price is 900 plus while 460 was 700 plus. These days price /perf ratio is going down the drain.
*
Yeah, my gigabyte GTX460 was only about RM725 3 years ago.

Hope to see the GTX760 performance near the GTX670 at competitive price and lower TDP. If not, will wait for AMD.

This post has been edited by kmarc: Jun 23 2013, 06:57 AM
skylinelover
post Jun 23 2013, 08:13 AM

Future Crypto Player😄👊Driver Abamsado😎😎
********
All Stars
11,266 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(arslow @ Jun 22 2013, 07:54 PM)
The price is 900 plus while 460 was 700 plus. These days price /perf ratio is going down the drain.
*
haha nvidia is becoming more like APPLE 4 the GPU line laugh.gif doh.gif
rav3n82
post Jun 23 2013, 09:56 AM

I find your lack of faith disturbing!
*******
Senior Member
7,084 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: Penang


QUOTE(kmarc @ Jun 23 2013, 06:55 AM)
Yeah, my gigabyte GTX460 was only about RM725 3 years ago.

Hope to see the GTX760 performance near the GTX670 at competitive price and lower TDP. If not, will wait for AMD.
*
GTX 760's performance is unlikely to match GTX 670. I believe Nvidia is leaving that to 760 Ti, which is likely to be their ace up their sleeve, as what Cyntrix mentioned above.
kmarc
post Jun 23 2013, 10:20 AM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(rav3n82 @ Jun 23 2013, 09:56 AM)
GTX 760's performance is unlikely to match GTX 670. I believe Nvidia is leaving that to 760 Ti, which is likely to be their ace up their sleeve, as what Cyntrix mentioned above.
*
As mentioned, hopefully "near" its performance. From the graph above, never expected it to match. wink.gif

Anyway, 2 days to go! drool.gif

This post has been edited by kmarc: Jun 23 2013, 10:24 AM
panafone
post Jun 23 2013, 10:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
426 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: somewhere over the rainbow


Picked up my gtx 780 from cyntrix yesterday. Awesome card! Black ops 2 never looked so good. Pretty silent card too. Hopefully it will last couple of years before I'll want to upgrade again.
CyntrixTech
post Jun 23 2013, 11:27 AM

Distributor
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(kmarc @ Jun 23 2013, 10:20 AM)
As mentioned, hopefully "near" its performance. From the graph above, never expected it to match. wink.gif

Anyway, 2 days to go! drool.gif
*
660 TI OC - 1344 cuda cores, 1006mhz base / 1084 boost / 6109 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 192 bit, GK106

760 Standard - 1152 cuda cores, 993mhz base / 1059 mhz boost/ 6008 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256bit, GK104

760 OC - 1152 cuda cores, 1111mhz base / 1176 mhz boost / 6208 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256bit, GK104

670 Jetstream - 1344 cuda cores, 1006mhz base / 1084 boost / 6109 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256 bit, GK104

There you have it. 660TI with AA disabled is about as fast as 670. But mem bandwidth kills it when AA is set to higher than 4. This time, 760 uses 256bit rams and stick to using GK104 but with a lower cuda cores.

560ti 448 cores was about as fast as 570 so without needing to see benchmark, I presume it sits in between exactly like the above. Pricing is already in between biggrin.gif

Once AMD launches their stuff in Q3, depending on what they are, we'd see 760 TI OC, 760 TI OC BOOST, 760 TI 14xx cuda cores and whatever model Nvidia need to place themselves ahead of AMD. What is most anticipated is 750 TI Boost OC (or whatever they want to name it) sitting right above 7870 XT Boost at sub RM 700-800. This will be your best value for money "460" from Nvidia
raydenex
post Jun 23 2013, 11:46 AM

"Updated my journal."
****
Senior Member
588 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang | Puchong | Malacca


Zotac GTX 780 (Reference design/Titan cooler)
Driver: 320.14
i7-3770K @ 4.6GHz
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Air-conditioned room thumbup.gif

Unigine Valley 1.0
Preset: Extreme HD | Ultra Quality | 8x AA | Full Screen | 1920x1080

Images;
1: Zotac Firestorm | Stock clocks/settings
2. Zotac Firestorm | Overclocked settings
3. Unigine Valley 1.0 | Benchmark results
4. GPU-Z

The boost for core was topping out at 1330MHz, temperature never exceed 85*C.
If I'm not mistaken, this Valley 1.0 score is higher than a stock Titan's, could be wrong.

This post has been edited by raydenex: Jun 23 2013, 11:56 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
moshpit21
post Jun 23 2013, 03:39 PM

LYN Permanent Resident
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(raydenex @ Jun 23 2013, 11:46 AM)
Zotac GTX 780 (Reference design/Titan cooler)
Driver: 320.14
i7-3770K @ 4.6GHz
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Air-conditioned room  thumbup.gif

Unigine Valley 1.0
Preset: Extreme HD | Ultra Quality | 8x AA | Full Screen | 1920x1080

Images;
1: Zotac Firestorm | Stock clocks/settings
2. Zotac Firestorm | Overclocked settings
3. Unigine Valley 1.0 | Benchmark results
4. GPU-Z

The boost for core was topping out at 1330MHz, temperature never exceed 85*C.
If I'm not mistaken, this Valley 1.0 score is higher than a stock Titan's, could be wrong.
*
The result is OC'ed right? Very good result.

This is for comparison from my system with the crappy 314.22 driver:
i7-3770K stock
Windows 8 Pro 64-Bit
Asus GTX 690 stock (max temp reached 79C on the 2nd chip)

Attached Image


Ulysses
post Jun 23 2013, 03:50 PM

尤利西斯
*******
Senior Member
2,822 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Georgetown, Penang


If got time, check here...
Prob.. not sure if it gc related..


https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2859586
kmarc
post Jun 23 2013, 04:31 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(CyntrixTech @ Jun 23 2013, 11:27 AM)
660 TI OC - 1344 cuda cores, 1006mhz base / 1084 boost / 6109 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 192 bit, GK106

760 Standard - 1152 cuda cores, 993mhz base / 1059 mhz boost/ 6008 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256bit, GK104

760 OC - 1152 cuda cores, 1111mhz base / 1176 mhz boost / 6208 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256bit, GK104

670 Jetstream - 1344 cuda cores, 1006mhz base / 1084 boost / 6109 mhz mem clock, 2GB GDDR5 256 bit, GK104

There you have it. 660TI with AA disabled is about as fast as 670. But mem bandwidth kills it when AA is set to higher than 4. This time, 760 uses 256bit rams and stick to using GK104 but with a lower cuda cores.

560ti 448 cores was about as fast as 570 so without needing to see benchmark, I presume it sits in between exactly like the above. Pricing is already in between biggrin.gif

Once AMD launches their stuff in Q3, depending on what they are, we'd see 760 TI OC, 760 TI OC BOOST, 760 TI 14xx cuda cores and whatever model Nvidia need to place themselves ahead of AMD. What is most anticipated is 750 TI Boost OC (or whatever they want to name it) sitting right above 7870 XT Boost at sub RM 700-800. This will be your best value for money "460" from Nvidia
*
Great explanation! thumbup.gif

Shucks, if that is true, Nvidia didn't bring anything new to the table. Just filling up the gaps. vmad.gif
moshpit21
post Jun 23 2013, 04:52 PM

LYN Permanent Resident
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(Ulysses @ Jun 23 2013, 03:50 PM)
If got time, check here...
Prob.. not sure if it gc related..
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2859586
*
I replied there bro
stasio
post Jun 23 2013, 07:35 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,506 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
Guys, new driver is out........320.39 :

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=379742

DriverVer = 06/14/2013, 9.18.13.2039

This post has been edited by stasio: Jun 23 2013, 07:37 PM
moshpit21
post Jun 23 2013, 07:57 PM

LYN Permanent Resident
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(stasio @ Jun 23 2013, 07:35 PM)
Guys, new driver is out........320.39 :

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=379742

DriverVer = 06/14/2013, 9.18.13.2039
*
Is that for real? because Nvidia.com still showing 320.18
raydenex
post Jun 23 2013, 08:03 PM

"Updated my journal."
****
Senior Member
588 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang | Puchong | Malacca


QUOTE(moshpit21 @ Jun 23 2013, 03:39 PM)
The result is OC'ed right? Very good result.

This is for comparison from my system with the crappy 314.22 driver:
i7-3770K stock
Windows 8 Pro 64-Bit
Asus GTX 690 stock (max temp reached 79C on the 2nd chip)

Attached Image
*
Yeah bro, the results for the OC'ed 780; still very surprised it pulled that score in Valley 1.0
I think stock Titans do 25xx ++ on the Extreme HD preset in Valley, correct me if I'm wrong.
moshpit21
post Jun 23 2013, 11:14 PM

LYN Permanent Resident
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(stasio @ Jun 23 2013, 07:35 PM)
Guys, new driver is out........320.39 :

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=379742

DriverVer = 06/14/2013, 9.18.13.2039
*
I downloaded but my Chrome warned me "appears malicious"

Have you actually tried it?

*update:

I installed it and ran some test, conclusion is THIS IS GOOD ! Dont know why Nvidia took so long, and also this one is not official yet, I'm guessing this is a leak. Even tho it's written for GTX 780 and Win 7 64-bit, it works fine on GTX 690 and Win 8 64-bit.

This post has been edited by moshpit21: Jun 23 2013, 11:57 PM
zad78
post Jun 24 2013, 09:29 AM

Remember... Remember
******
Senior Member
1,237 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: 3rd Rock From The Sun



QUOTE(moshpit21 @ Jun 23 2013, 11:14 PM)
I downloaded but my Chrome warned me "appears malicious"

Have you actually tried it?

*update:

I installed it and ran some test, conclusion is THIS IS GOOD ! Dont know why Nvidia took so long, and also this one is not official yet, I'm guessing this is a leak. Even tho it's written for GTX 780 and Win 7 64-bit, it works fine on GTX 690 and Win 8 64-bit.
*
So can I safely install this drive?
marfccy
post Jun 24 2013, 11:54 AM

Le Ponyland!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2011


anyone tested the new driver already?

on 314.22 still fine for a GTX660 user like me.. but what about GTX700 series users? hmm.gif
94brian
post Jun 24 2013, 12:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


who else card died after install 320.18 ???
mine did xDDD
stasio
post Jun 24 2013, 01:05 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,506 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
QUOTE(moshpit21 @ Jun 23 2013, 07:57 PM)
Is that for real? because Nvidia.com still showing 320.18
*
nod.gif
QUOTE(moshpit21 @ Jun 23 2013, 11:14 PM)
I downloaded but my Chrome warned me "appears malicious"

Have you actually tried it?

*update:

I installed it and ran some test, conclusion is THIS IS GOOD ! Dont know why Nvidia took so long, and also this one is not official yet, I'm guessing this is a leak. Even tho it's written for GTX 780 and Win 7 64-bit, it works fine on GTX 690 and Win 8 64-bit.
*
biggrin.gif
As on link posted above can found more info about this drivers.


This post has been edited by stasio: Jun 24 2013, 01:07 PM
moshpit21
post Jun 24 2013, 02:51 PM

LYN Permanent Resident
******
Senior Member
1,205 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


This 320.39 is promising, just install it guys, especially if you're running SLI. No more crappy 320.18 or outdated 314.22.

Make sure you clean install this, even if you have time, do the CCleaner and Driver Fusion method.

125 Pages « < 104 105 106 107 108 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0201sec    1.17    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th December 2025 - 12:29 AM