QUOTE(freakenstein @ Feb 20 2013, 11:51 AM)
HTC One Official Thread / M7, 4.7" 1080p - Snapdragon S600 1.7ghz
|
|
 Feb 20 2013, 12:24 PM
|
 
Senior Member
2,175 posts Joined: May 2008 From: ~Earth~™®©   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:24 PM
|
Junior Member
252 posts Joined: Jul 2008
|
Never owned an htc but if my friends experiences with that brand are anything to go by, id avoid them. But speaking of specs, this is top
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:25 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
QUOTE(junsheng @ Feb 20 2013, 10:17 AM) nah here is the compare the s3 version that is using sony imx175 camera sensor No wonder I felt this is so weird... 1/1.32 is big... LOL
Get your facts right next time... Even Nokia 808 also 1/1.2 only... 
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:26 PM
|
|
All Stars
13,476 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
QUOTE(Nephrite @ Feb 20 2013, 12:24 PM) Wow nearly drop from chair. Quadrant score 11k that was massive score. The score was okay but it was impressive how much faster it finished those integer test and was already at graphic test. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:30 PM
|
Senior Member
1,257 posts Joined: Apr 2011 From: Penang Malaysia, sometime KL
|
QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Feb 20 2013, 12:25 PM) No wonder I felt this is so weird... 1/1.32 is big... LOL sry typo should be Get your facts right next time... Even Nokia 808 also 1/1.2 only...
1/3.2 (0.31") for sony exmor r & foveon 1/3 (0.33") only  This post has been edited by junsheng: Feb 20 2013, 12:30 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:30 PM
|
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Feb 20 2013, 12:26 PM) The score was okay but it was impressive how much faster it finished those integer test and was already at graphic test. coz the new snapdragon 600 is 30% faster than the snapdragon s4 pro on the nexus. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:43 PM
|
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011
|
QUOTE What is an UltraPixel? A stupid trademarked buzzword for one particular manufacturer's CMOS photo receptors that are slightly larger than the other CMOS photo receptors by the same manufacturer, because calling them "lower resolution" is still apparently un-cool, and it's better to just not challenge the mold that more megapixels=better unless we can come up with stupid buzzwords for "better pixels" to explain it away. Larger sensors have been around forever, and are ALWAYS better. Cramming more photo receptors onto smaller dies has ALWAYS degraded pixel quality. This is nothing new. This has been the case for as long as digital photography has existed, and any photographer already knows this, and compares sensors accordingly. This is just a way to market fewer pixels to the uneducated best-buy-shopping masses, and is just as meaningless as the "megapixels" metric the blue shirts are pushing. This post has been edited by SyathibiyMegat: Feb 20 2013, 12:44 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:56 PM
|
Senior Member
1,768 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
Impressive benchmark.
But still a doubt it is officially using a 2gb ddr2 or ddr3 ram? On wiki, s600 only run ddr3 ram |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:02 PM
|
Senior Member
862 posts Joined: Jul 2008
|
QUOTE(dopp @ Feb 20 2013, 11:39 AM) Stopping me - Android version update for HTC is slow Sony updates is even slower. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:05 PM
|
Junior Member
199 posts Joined: Feb 2012
|
samsunh update slower too.
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,768 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
All also slower expect google device
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:11 PM
|
Senior Member
1,991 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Seri Kembangan 
|
HTC is slower because of the heavy integration of sense into the android.
its not just some visual change but a lot of functionality change, that could affect the stability and security of the software. after integrate they need a longer period of time for testing before public release, that the reason we cant compare the update speed with official google or any other manufacturer. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
6,109 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Mike India Romeo India
|
Well Sense 5 seems to look light, hopefully it'll be easier and faster for them to update the OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:18 PM
|
All Stars
13,192 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Middle of Avalon
|
If updates is so important then it's better to get Nexus phone.
 Now they already on 4.2.2...lolz |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:21 PM
|
Senior Member
1,719 posts Joined: Jan 2011
|
Wait for s4 to come out.
Then price drop and buy HTC one. Lol |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009
|
QUOTE(douglas_tong @ Feb 20 2013, 01:21 PM) Wait for s4 to come out. THE WAITING GAME NEVER ENDS.Then price drop and buy HTC one. Lol Set ur budget and timeframe to buy phone. and get the best phone with that budget. |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:24 PM
|
Senior Member
3,239 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
initial camera sample shots look quite bad, same goes with night shot. wont put too much bet on this if camera quality your priority.
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:27 PM
|
|
Junior Member
199 posts Joined: Feb 2012
|
for me 4.7 and 4.5 look solid and enough..
if want a bigger size better buy an ipad mini or tab |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:35 PM
|
Senior Member
875 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: :hehe:
|
QUOTE(Noyoudontcare @ Feb 20 2013, 12:24 PM) Never owned an htc but if my friends experiences with that brand are anything to go by, id avoid them. But speaking of specs, this is top mind to share? |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 02:05 PM
|
|
All Stars
13,192 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Middle of Avalon
|
QUOTE(toughnut @ Feb 20 2013, 01:24 PM) initial camera sample shots look quite bad, same goes with night shot. wont put too much bet on this if camera quality your priority. I'll wait a bit longer if I buy this One phone. HTC product usually have problem with it initial first batch. I'll wait for the second batch..much safer...lolz |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0178sec
 0.71
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:42 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.