QUOTE(facfil @ Feb 19 2013, 09:41 AM)
Intel proc one of the best but hardly any apps at the moment...
can choose other processor meh this K900?
Best looking Android: Lenovo K900
|
|
 Feb 19 2013, 09:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006 
|
|
Quote|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(facfil @ Feb 19 2013, 09:59 AM) Yes, unfortunately. Most apps are compiled for ARM, not x86 am sure if that intel phone can run android OS.. it takes care of the rest right?  |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(Emanyshie @ Feb 19 2013, 10:00 AM) aik..lenovo pun mau buat mobilephone? gamble sama intel proc some more... QUOTE The recently-revealed Intel dual-core processor powering the Lenovo K900 has performed commendably in a benchmark. the intel dual core proc nearly double of the quadcore performance.. you think leh?Powered by a 2GHz dual-core Intel Atom processor, the smartphone scored more than 27,000 points on the AnTuTu benchmark. Comparatively, the HTC Droid DNA settles for a score of 14,000. The latter device is powered by the quad-core Snapdragon S4 Pro. The benchmark for the K900, however, also outperformed the Samsung Galaxy Note 2, which sports a 1.6GHz Exynos 4412 processor. |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(facfil @ Feb 19 2013, 10:06 AM) Not really. Take a look at the Play Store, you'll find x86 apps. Why would they be necessary? maybe for running android aps on PC? |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(facfil @ Feb 19 2013, 10:10 AM) Yes, thank you. Most people here don't seem to get it. QUOTE Those running Android on Intel rather than ARM may find that a very small number of apps don't work. Earlier this year, Intel promised 90-percent full compatibility for apps. some aps not compatible.. but since intel say working to 90% compatibility.. means it's exception rather than norm.. not as you implied earlier that all aps need to be x86 then only can run in this intel proc |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 10:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(facfil @ Feb 19 2013, 10:19 AM) In my experience, "compatible" doesn't mean "works properly". guess it will work itself out in due time.. if intel userbase increases with these new medfield procs.. then the call for compatibility is even greater for developers.Still a lot of issues with non-native x86 Android apps. |
|
|
Feb 19 2013, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
9,206 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(Tookia @ Feb 19 2013, 05:08 PM) Looks not so important as hardware specs: Intel Atom Z2580; Dual-core 1. 8 GHz, not quad core; 1080 x 1920 pixels, 5.5 inches; Android Jelly Bean 4.2....if cheap price maybe consider that intel processor will 2x whip a 1.5 quadcore la. u didnt see the benchmarks meh? |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0173sec
 0.86
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 03:20 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.