Imagine this. You've led a frugal and financially-responsible life with no exorbitant purchases, living within your means and squirreling away your savings in the Employees Provident Fund (EPF).
With that magical 60th birthday now approaching, retirement looms large and, more importantly, the eligibility to withdraw your retirement savings is becoming a reality. Your mind is now set on taking that round-the-world cruise you and the wife have been talking about for the last 30 years, on top of buying that plot of land in Tanjung Malim and building your retirement home.
However, just before you're able to do so, the rules change. You're now only allowed to withdraw a small portion of your savings periodically. Why? Because too many of your peers had in the past squandered away their savings, only to become insolvent in their retirement years.
How much interference is deemed too much when it comes to managing the people's retirement savings? Prime Minster Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's announcement that the government is open to a suggestion by EPF to make it mandatory for new members in future to withdraw their savings periodically, instead of a lump sum on reaching 55, has triggered debate.
MORE NEWS
Full split to ensure competitive returns for EPF members
Rafizi: Govt standing firm, not considering another round of EPF withdrawal
PM hopes EPF's local investments to reach 70 per cent this year
EPF says investment climate will remain challenging
While Anwar said he was open to the idea, he nevertheless noted that some constraints had to be taken into consideration, including the fact that the savings of some EPF members were simply too meagre. EPF chief executive officer Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan stated that making periodic withdrawals on a monthly basis could offer members a better way to manage their retirement funds. This, he said, would also allow them to continue enjoying annual dividends for their remaining savings.
There is merit to the suggestion. Data from EPF showed that up to November 2021, some 3.6 million members had less than RM1,000 in their accounts. It also said that members retiring in the next few years would need roughly RM600,000 to have a decent life in retirement. While there is undoubtedly a need to ensure that retirees have enough to enjoy their twilight years, there is also a fine line between managing and micro-managing.
Take the case of Singapore, where the criteria for withdrawing funds upon reaching the retirement age of 65 is ever changing. The criteria for a full draw down of one's savings is difficult to fulfil, especially for middle and low-income earners.
The reality for many Singaporeans is that despite working diligently all their lives, there is little chance for many to enjoy the fruits of their labour, and they have to contend with a dripping faucet of finances to get by in retirement, sufficient to survive, but not quite enough to enjoy the rest of the ride. We have to tread carefully. While there is a noble premise to the idea of limiting access to one's retirement savings, at the end of the day, it is ultimately the people's money.
Analysts have said the government has yet to address the elephant in the room, which is to increase the average salary, which now sees 50 per cent of Malaysians earning less than RM2,500 a month despite the rising cost of living. Anything else would be putting the cart before the horse.
Sos
https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/leaders/2023...draw-all-or-not