more specifically, when paired with BG set to HIGH mode.

too bad D600 / D800 can't do it.

more reason to buy.

see, even Canon's full frame bodies don't have high FPS unless you buy the 1D X.

D700 is nice but i prefer something with FF + Video capability.

as to my photography preference, 5 - 6 fps works fine. I'm photographing still subjects most of the time.

Even D7000 no speed boost from grip.

don't know what to buy is a clear sign of don't know what you shoot, what you like to shoot, and what's your style / preference.

you already have a D90 and a good set of lens. stick with it unless you want to try something else, eg Macro or UWA landscape

no need to rush for FX. DX works great to begin with.

check whether or not you assigned color profile like Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB by accident.

aihhh say before already.

camera LCD is not accurate. it's made to impress would-be buyers. simple as that.

why choose Adobe? Stick to sRGB easiest. Go Adobe RGB only if you know what you're doing.

Most people's monitor can't even view Adobe RGB color gamut properly to begin with.

Some browsers don't support ICC color profile either.

I was like you last time, too clever use Adobe RGB. After come back, wonder why all skin tones look like zombie after I upload to the Internet.

That's not to say Adobe RGB isn't good. If you want to max out the colors, have the screen to view it and want to print out with all the colors - it's really great. Prophoto RGB covers even more color gamut.

for starters, just stick to sRGB. I still use sRGB for my professional work. It's not a matter of concern in my deliverables so I'm not bothered.

sRGB is still the best color space for web use if your objective is to provide the best viewing experience for the widest audience.

You photograph in JPG, right? If you are, try converting your Adobe RGB photo to sRGB. Vomit blood.

Just stick to sRGB for every thing.

i understand where he's coming from because I had such problem before.

I use JPG but set to Adobe RGB. On the computer it looks fine but upon uploading to browser, the skin all look like corpse.

In the end have to find tune to add the red tones into the picture.

people may not be using a calibrate monitor with good LCD panel but color is still color, they still get to see it.

that's why for professional purpose, we use good grade LCD and do calibration. It doesn't have to be top end LCD or super detailed calibration, just a basic one will do.

It's only NOT a rumor after Nikon announces it.

regarding this - doesn't Nikon have Custom function that alllows any of the back button (eg AE-lock) to be used as AF-ON?

oh, very different from Canon.

despite having the AF-On button, I custom set it to use the AE-lock button (2nd from the right)



just like you, I don't have long thumb so it's much more comfortable than reaching for the AF-On button.

yeah apparently 1.3x. now comes DX confusion for Nikon users. Last time for Canon, the 1.3x is APS-H.

Now Nikon has 2 types of APS-C.

Ehh so the 1.3x crop factor is additional mode? Hrmmm...........

oh. confusing.

I was thinking why 1.3 ......... .then 1.5 with 1.3 crop factor.

so it's actually, as what you say, 1.5 X 1.3

yeah makes no difference actually. cos FOV change only. It's still the same pixels density.

D600 already so many people complain, I wonder how D400 would be.

how much is D600 market price now?

D600 got FX goodness.