Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.19, D7100 announced weeeee~
|
|
 Feb 23 2013, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard  
|
guys.. im thinking to sell off my kitlens (18-105) and replace it with tamron 17-50 F2.8 instead, since i want a faster lens. but what about the photo quality? will it consider to be a downgrade? since i got my 50mm, i rarely use the kitlens anymore, but sometime go out with friends want to help take pic still need lens that can zoom in and out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 09:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 23 2013, 08:55 PM) Tamron 17-50 is pretty decent in terms of optics, but bear in mind focusing is quite... crappy on the tamron. the infamous back/front focus issue? hmm.. seems like their QC not that good.. |
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(popcorn513 @ Feb 23 2013, 10:12 PM) Thanks, so FX lense will work perfectly for DX body? Only concern for FX lens is price...? yes d7k rocks.. Better stick back d7000 and practice more  |
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 11:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Feb 23 2013, 11:38 PM) im using one with VC.. the non vc ones are sharper, the vc ones are less sharp.. bt it's quite good at the price..though sometimes u might face problems like inaccurate focussing at low light.. n oso decentering.. im will get non-vc if im getting one. hehe. but if it works and deliver picture comparable to my kitlens, then i think i will switch. D800 body is 8k plus rite? is equals to D600 + 16-35 f/4 leh..haha..big hole in pocket for d800.. all FF oso big hole..  |
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 11:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Feb 23 2013, 11:45 PM) yeah..bt mine less than a year old oso kena d.. 0.0 how do u notice that? uneven sharpness? |
|
|
Feb 23 2013, 11:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Feb 23 2013, 11:53 PM)  DSC_0441 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr i noticed a lot of my pictures (portrait) are blur..i tot focusing problem..rupanya, right side of lens oof.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2013, 10:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(amduser @ Feb 25 2013, 09:34 PM) neXus 4 gonna second this.. just got my nexus today xD |
|
|
Feb 25 2013, 10:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Feb 25 2013, 10:10 PM) i know nexus 4 is smoothest because vanilla setting only, but i eyeing one HTC ONE with ultra loud boom speaker confirm 100% can wake up from sleep actually.. i bought nexus just few days before saw the announcement for htc one. lol... but anyway nexus 4 is cheap.. so ok lar  |
|
|
Mar 3 2013, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Mar 3 2013, 09:33 PM) The D3200 doesn't have an AF motor, so if you are planning on getting a 50mm, the 1.8g (with motor) would be the better pick, unless if you prefer manual focusing true.. saw a video reviewing those 2 lens. and the G version perform better in lowlight situation. focus also faster in G. If used on a body with an AF motor, the 1.8G should focus slightly faster and quieter than an 1.8D  |
|
|
Mar 3 2013, 11:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(pspslim007 @ Mar 3 2013, 11:01 PM) D7000 body which memory card i should use ? btw thanks to everyone taking their time reading my questions. im using sandisk ultra no 6. 30MB/s |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
 seems interesting  |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 08:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(ImBoYbOy @ Mar 5 2013, 07:55 PM) okok, sounds like D90 really outdated.is that true ? D7000 is better than D90 for sure on paper. but if you're good, u can still take good pics from D90 then for you which one more good ? last year D7000 with kitlens is around 3.5k. now with new model around i think the price have drop already. D5200 is entry level, D7000 Is another level up. go to some nikon center and test it yourself. lol. |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 08:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(ImBoYbOy @ Mar 5 2013, 08:12 PM) Conclusion ? i will suggest D7000 coz im using one  i mean which one more good for you. or other suggestion yet as my budget was below 4k ?  would you be disappointed if later on u found out D7000 doesn't suit u? if yes then make up your own mind if probably no then just buy D7000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 09:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(ImBoYbOy @ Mar 5 2013, 08:50 PM) when u bought ? and what the current market price ? oct last year at 3.5k. current market price i dont know. u can opt for the body only, and go for 2nd hand lens.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(ImBoYbOy @ Mar 5 2013, 09:14 PM) don't you also buy the body only and the u buy the 2nd hand lens afterward? i bought together with kitlens. anyhow if u r new altogether with dslr i recommend u to use kitlens first. don't worry.. my kitlens is like new xDjust worry for the qualify of the 2nd hand lens as we dunno how the owner take care about the lens. |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(teetaatee @ Mar 5 2013, 10:36 PM) imma still with D90 yea.. then u can convince him that D90 still take great pictures  |
|
|
Mar 5 2013, 11:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Mar 5 2013, 11:05 PM) I've seen teetaatee sifu's photos taken with the D90, wouldn't know its a D90 if didn't check guess so.. me too was planning to get D90 only.. then i got a chance to hold & shoot with D7000.. after that i don't want D90 ady. hahahha Still, if budget permits, its more worth it to get the D7000 right? |
|
|
Mar 6 2013, 12:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
did he force them to sing 1M4U? lol. he look like r*tard kiddo in this pic.. whoops
|
|
|
Mar 6 2013, 07:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Mar 6 2013, 04:42 PM) Yeah, for me I would go for a 18-105mm~ I remembered someone here is selling one 2nd hand QUOTE(Pro3363 @ Mar 6 2013, 04:49 PM) Yes! *cough cough* I kinda regret getting my DSLR with 18-55mm instead of 18-105mm » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Mar 6 2013, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
1,182 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Asgard
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 6 2013, 05:19 PM) i was using 18-55 that time, but way way longer ago la, i was told 18-55 non VR kit lens is the best built lulz. actually my friend told me similiar thing.. he said.. 18-55mm on D7000 is sharper than 18-105mm. lol. is that even possible?anyway, it still up to you, only test your self for 18-55 or 18-105 see which one suitable for you. i forget this 2 kit lens got pro and con or not, like this have extra focal range but MTF chart not nice or bla bla |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0449sec
 0.22
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 04:50 AM |
Quote