
#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

Source : http://famecherry.com/models/sunshine-girl/
Im just a hobbyist
Cheers =)
This post has been edited by Wholleymolley: Jan 28 2013, 05:49 PM
I Am Catch The Pretty Sunlight In One Hand, Love this sexy dynamic range
|
|
Jan 28 2013, 05:45 PM, updated 13y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
#1
![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]() #5 ![]() #6 ![]() Source : http://famecherry.com/models/sunshine-girl/ Im just a hobbyist Cheers =) This post has been edited by Wholleymolley: Jan 28 2013, 05:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2013, 10:40 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
4,495 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca |
weird light i see u have set
|
|
|
Jan 28 2013, 11:19 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 10:48 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
2,540 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: KL |
Sorry but mind explaining what 'sexy dynamic range' is? I didn't know there's sexy and non-sexy dynamic range.
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 01:42 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 01:53 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
2,540 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 02:04 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
4,495 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 05:45 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
899 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Klang |
dude, I think what you need is 5d mark III for all those 'sexy dynamic range'
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 07:07 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 29 2013, 01:53 PM) No. I would call the 85mm f1.2 as being overkill but none the less impressive but I wouldn't call it sexy. then we will never understand each othersee this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIFZzq6D3dw this lens looks awesome but i has no money =( QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jan 29 2013, 02:04 PM) lol diff la QUOTE(Zicron @ Jan 29 2013, 05:45 PM) lol medium format bro |
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 10:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
899 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Klang |
since when 5d mark III is medium format?
|
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 10:23 PM
|
|
Elite
2,540 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: KL |
I do have an 85mm lens but mine is f2.8 and it suits my needs just fine and is less than RM 1k. Best bang for my buck. I love the 85mm focal length but then I do not need it to be f1.2
That's the reason I say the f1.2 is overkill. Although I love my little 85mm lens, I wouldn't call it sexy. I wouldn't call any lens sexy. They are just lenses and there is nothing sexy about them. Just me though. Here's a shot on my 85mm f2.8 wide open at f2.8 ![]() |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 01:45 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
QUOTE(Zicron @ Jan 29 2013, 10:05 PM) what i meant is there is no point for me to upgrade to mark III if really want sexy dynamic rangeBetter get medium format QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 29 2013, 10:23 PM) I do have an 85mm lens but mine is f2.8 and it suits my needs just fine and is less than RM 1k. Best bang for my buck. I love the 85mm focal length but then I do not need it to be f1.2 I see, what lens is it ? That's the reason I say the f1.2 is overkill. Although I love my little 85mm lens, I wouldn't call it sexy. I wouldn't call any lens sexy. They are just lenses and there is nothing sexy about them. Just me though. Here's a shot on my 85mm f2.8 wide open at f2.8 ![]() I never heard of 85mm f2.8, u stop down ? or is build like this ? shoot la during sunrise, will be sexier dynamic range, i addicted now to sunrise |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM
|
|
Elite
2,540 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(Wholleymolley @ Jan 30 2013, 01:45 AM) I see, what lens is it ? I never heard of 85mm f2.8, u stop down ? or is build like this ? shoot la during sunrise, will be sexier dynamic range, i addicted now to sunrise The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no? Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 09:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM) There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results. macho dynamic range The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no? Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset? |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 10:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,864 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: NoWhere |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 11:27 AM
|
|
Elite
4,495 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM) There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results. sunset is sultry and sensational The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no? Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset? |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 01:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,864 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: NoWhere |
I am very surprise TS shooting for so long liao now only he discovered magic hour for natural sun light.
|
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 02:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,811 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
i discover but couldnt wake up for it, hahahah
and TS, ur thread title really need to work a little on it |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 04:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
536 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: 4:44 am |
just some thought,
#1 why is the colour cast different for the picture? #2 picture number 5, very weird, the gold cast and the lighting direction. hobbyist also need to improve ma. come on. |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 05:57 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
19 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Secret Hehe Base |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM) There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results. 700 is good price, cant beat it, 2.8 for that price is ok la coz some 1.8 users i know stop down to 2 - 2.8 to get sharpness anyways The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no? Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset? mine is f2.0 sunset in malaysia nowdays got risk of raining so i avoid it QUOTE(Ask_Yip @ Jan 30 2013, 01:20 PM) I am very surprise TS shooting for so long liao now only he discovered magic hour for natural sun light. addicted, not discovered QUOTE(xCM @ Jan 30 2013, 04:04 PM) just some thought, sunrise is a dynamic phenomenon, within that few minutes period the color changes dramatically from blue to red to orange #1 why is the colour cast different for the picture? #2 picture number 5, very weird, the gold cast and the lighting direction. hobbyist also need to improve ma. come on. Amduser : lol |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 07:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
Can you define dynamic range and how do you call it sexy in those photos?
I know that the sunset/sunrise is the golden/magic hour due to the quality of light it gives, but sexy dynamic range... |
|
|
Feb 5 2013, 09:07 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
281 posts Joined: May 2008 From: kay el |
just gonna comment on number 1.
the pose from the model is totally weird, this frame not only show that she has a "meaty" arm but also looks short.... what is she trying to do? trying to look her own armpit hair??? furthermore, the pic is too warm although it is sunset but such a warm color makes the model have darker skin tone compare to picture no 2 which i personally like that skin color tone. |
|
|
Feb 7 2013, 12:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,793 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuala Terengganu |
u shoot with 85mm f1.2 L? Oh man it's a waste
|
|
|
Feb 7 2013, 11:59 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
Personally i really feel the skin tone and overall color is weird, donno how to describe, probably ur white balance is out. And i don't get any sexy feel from any of the photo.
I recently watch a presentation from youtube talking about how to improve ur portrait photography, which i think is better to share over here for everyone to learn rather than watching people talking about how sexy the lense is (That's just nonsense). Direction of Light: Your Key to Better Portrait Photography: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMiYgxVTS_0...BE57348B7C9DF91 This post has been edited by unknown_obj: Feb 7 2013, 12:00 PM |
|
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:17 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
All shots have magenta tinge, not sure if that's your intent, but no it doesn't work. Or unless you want a hipstagram look, well perhaps...
If this is only what you can get from an 85, then I guess that lens is a waste in your hands. Stick to a 75-300 and zoom to 85 is a much cheaper alternative. |
|
|
Mar 1 2013, 01:04 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
I don't see any sexy dymanic range here. what i saw some PS shoot. A waste if using 85 f/1.2 and stop down to f/2
DOF is so thin and shoots look soft |
|
|
Mar 1 2013, 11:17 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(EvanKeat @ Mar 1 2013, 01:04 AM) I don't see any sexy dymanic range here. what i saw some PS shoot. A waste if using 85 f/1.2 and stop down to f/2 I kinda doubt this is taken with the 85/1.2. That lens is capable of wonders! Which isn't here in this case. Anyway, the 85/1.2 isn't famous for being a sharp lens to begin with.DOF is so thin and shoots look soft |
| Change to: | 0.0216sec
0.65
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:16 PM |