Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 I Am Catch The Pretty Sunlight In One Hand, Love this sexy dynamic range

views
     
TSWholleymolley
post Jan 28 2013, 05:45 PM, updated 13y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
#1 user posted image

#2 user posted image

#3 user posted image

#4 user posted image

#5 user posted image

#6 user posted image


Source : http://famecherry.com/models/sunshine-girl/



Im just a hobbyist

Cheers =)

This post has been edited by Wholleymolley: Jan 28 2013, 05:49 PM
adam_lss
post Jan 28 2013, 10:40 PM

7th heaven
Group Icon
Elite
4,495 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca


weird light i see u have set
TSWholleymolley
post Jan 28 2013, 11:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jan 28 2013, 10:40 PM)
weird light i see u have set
*
sunrise
shootkk
post Jan 29 2013, 10:48 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Sorry but mind explaining what 'sexy dynamic range' is? I didn't know there's sexy and non-sexy dynamic range.
TSWholleymolley
post Jan 29 2013, 01:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 29 2013, 10:48 AM)
Sorry but mind explaining what 'sexy dynamic range' is? I didn't know there's sexy and non-sexy dynamic range.
*
would u ever call a 85mm f1.2 sexy ?
shootkk
post Jan 29 2013, 01:53 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(Wholleymolley @ Jan 29 2013, 01:42 PM)
would u ever call a 85mm f1.2 sexy ?
*
No. I would call the 85mm f1.2 as being overkill but none the less impressive but I wouldn't call it sexy.
adam_lss
post Jan 29 2013, 02:04 PM

7th heaven
Group Icon
Elite
4,495 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca


QUOTE(Wholleymolley @ Jan 29 2013, 01:42 PM)
would u ever call a 85mm f1.2 sexy ?
*
i oni know how to see sexy models i dunno how to see sexy lens tongue.gif
Zicron
post Jan 29 2013, 05:45 PM

Come to the Dark Side
*****
Senior Member
899 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Klang


dude, I think what you need is 5d mark III for all those 'sexy dynamic range'
TSWholleymolley
post Jan 29 2013, 07:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 29 2013, 01:53 PM)
No. I would call the 85mm f1.2 as being overkill but none the less impressive but I wouldn't call it sexy.
*
then we will never understand each other

see this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIFZzq6D3dw

this lens looks awesome but i has no money =(



QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jan 29 2013, 02:04 PM)
i oni know how to see sexy models i dunno how to see sexy lens tongue.gif
*
lol diff la



QUOTE(Zicron @ Jan 29 2013, 05:45 PM)
dude, I think what you need is 5d mark III for all those 'sexy dynamic range'
*
lol medium format bro
Zicron
post Jan 29 2013, 10:05 PM

Come to the Dark Side
*****
Senior Member
899 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Klang


since when 5d mark III is medium format?
shootkk
post Jan 29 2013, 10:23 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


I do have an 85mm lens but mine is f2.8 and it suits my needs just fine and is less than RM 1k. Best bang for my buck. I love the 85mm focal length but then I do not need it to be f1.2

That's the reason I say the f1.2 is overkill. Although I love my little 85mm lens, I wouldn't call it sexy. I wouldn't call any lens sexy. They are just lenses and there is nothing sexy about them. Just me though.


Here's a shot on my 85mm f2.8 wide open at f2.8

user posted image

TSWholleymolley
post Jan 30 2013, 01:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
QUOTE(Zicron @ Jan 29 2013, 10:05 PM)
since when 5d mark III is medium format?
*
what i meant is there is no point for me to upgrade to mark III if really want sexy dynamic range

Better get medium format



QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 29 2013, 10:23 PM)
I do have an 85mm lens but mine is f2.8 and it suits my needs just fine and is less than RM 1k. Best bang for my buck. I love the 85mm focal length but then I do not need it to be f1.2

That's the reason I say the f1.2 is overkill. Although I love my little 85mm lens, I wouldn't call it sexy. I wouldn't call any lens sexy. They are just lenses and there is nothing sexy about them. Just me though.
Here's a shot on my 85mm f2.8 wide open at f2.8

user posted image
*
I see, what lens is it ?

I never heard of 85mm f2.8, u stop down ? or is build like this ?

shoot la during sunrise, will be sexier dynamic range, i addicted now to sunrise
shootkk
post Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(Wholleymolley @ Jan 30 2013, 01:45 AM)

I see, what lens is it ?

I never heard of 85mm f2.8, u stop down ? or is build like this ?

shoot la during sunrise, will be sexier dynamic range, i addicted now to sunrise
*
There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results.

The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no?

Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset?
amduser
post Jan 30 2013, 09:55 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM)
There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results.

The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no?

Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset?
*
macho dynamic range laugh.gif
Ask_Yip
post Jan 30 2013, 10:19 AM

Retired Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,864 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: NoWhere
QUOTE(amduser @ Jan 30 2013, 09:55 AM)
macho dynamic range laugh.gif
*
LOL biggrin.gif
adam_lss
post Jan 30 2013, 11:27 AM

7th heaven
Group Icon
Elite
4,495 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Kemuning, Kay Ell, Pea Jay, Ara Damansara, Malacca


QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM)
There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results.

The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no?

Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset?
*
sunset is sultry and sensational tongue.gif
Ask_Yip
post Jan 30 2013, 01:20 PM

Retired Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,864 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: NoWhere
I am very surprise TS shooting for so long liao now only he discovered magic hour for natural sun light.
rx330
post Jan 30 2013, 02:02 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,811 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
i discover but couldnt wake up for it, hahahah

and TS, ur thread title really need to work a little on it
xCM
post Jan 30 2013, 04:04 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
536 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: 4:44 am
just some thought,

#1 why is the colour cast different for the picture?
#2 picture number 5, very weird, the gold cast and the lighting direction.

hobbyist also need to improve ma. come on.
TSWholleymolley
post Jan 30 2013, 05:57 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
19 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Secret Hehe Base
QUOTE(shootkk @ Jan 30 2013, 08:36 AM)
There are other brands of DSLR camera out there apart from Canon. I'm shooting Sony so my lens is the Sony 85mm f2.8 lens which is a low cost lens. It's all plastic build but it gives great results.

The Canon 85mm f1.2 sells for around RM 7k while I got mine for less than RM 700. I think sacrificing 2 and one third of a stop on aperture for one tenth of the price is worth it, no?

Shooting during sunrise will give sexy dynamic range? How do you define sexy dynamic range? If sunrise give sexy dynamic range then how about sunset?
*
700 is good price, cant beat it, 2.8 for that price is ok la coz some 1.8 users i know stop down to 2 - 2.8 to get sharpness anyways

mine is f2.0

sunset in malaysia nowdays got risk of raining so i avoid it



QUOTE(Ask_Yip @ Jan 30 2013, 01:20 PM)
I am very surprise TS shooting for so long liao now only he discovered magic hour for natural sun light.
*
addicted, not discovered




QUOTE(xCM @ Jan 30 2013, 04:04 PM)
just some thought,

#1 why is the colour cast different for the picture?
#2 picture number 5, very weird, the gold cast and the lighting direction.

hobbyist also need to improve ma. come on.
*
sunrise is a dynamic phenomenon, within that few minutes period the color changes dramatically from blue to red to orange



Amduser : lol

zeipher
post Jan 30 2013, 07:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
330 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
Can you define dynamic range and how do you call it sexy in those photos?

I know that the sunset/sunrise is the golden/magic hour due to the quality of light it gives, but sexy dynamic range... hmm.gif
whyteaz
post Feb 5 2013, 09:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
281 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: kay el
just gonna comment on number 1.

the pose from the model is totally weird, this frame not only show that she has a "meaty" arm but also looks short....
what is she trying to do? trying to look her own armpit hair???

furthermore, the pic is too warm although it is sunset but such a warm color makes the model have darker skin tone compare to picture no 2 which i personally like that skin color tone.
chongkiatz
post Feb 7 2013, 12:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,793 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Kuala Terengganu
u shoot with 85mm f1.2 L? Oh man it's a waste tongue.gif tongue.gif
unknown_obj
post Feb 7 2013, 11:59 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
20 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
Personally i really feel the skin tone and overall color is weird, donno how to describe, probably ur white balance is out. And i don't get any sexy feel from any of the photo.

I recently watch a presentation from youtube talking about how to improve ur portrait photography, which i think is better to share over here for everyone to learn rather than watching people talking about how sexy the lense is (That's just nonsense).

Direction of Light: Your Key to Better Portrait Photography: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMiYgxVTS_0...BE57348B7C9DF91

This post has been edited by unknown_obj: Feb 7 2013, 12:00 PM
lwliam
post Feb 28 2013, 12:17 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


All shots have magenta tinge, not sure if that's your intent, but no it doesn't work. Or unless you want a hipstagram look, well perhaps...

If this is only what you can get from an 85, then I guess that lens is a waste in your hands. Stick to a 75-300 and zoom to 85 is a much cheaper alternative.
EvanKeat
post Mar 1 2013, 01:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
I don't see any sexy dymanic range here. what i saw some PS shoot. A waste if using 85 f/1.2 and stop down to f/2 cry.gif

DOF is so thin and shoots look soft hmm.gif


lwliam
post Mar 1 2013, 11:17 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(EvanKeat @ Mar 1 2013, 01:04 AM)
I don't see any sexy dymanic range here. what i saw some PS shoot. A waste if using 85 f/1.2 and stop down to f/2  cry.gif

DOF is so thin and shoots look soft  hmm.gif
*
I kinda doubt this is taken with the 85/1.2. That lens is capable of wonders! Which isn't here in this case. Anyway, the 85/1.2 isn't famous for being a sharp lens to begin with.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0216sec    0.65    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:16 PM