had you used the Samsung Galaxy S III - GT-I9300 to play Temple Run , really slow.while the 9100 can play very well ,had no idea about this. while as for other games,really ok.
So far so good.. for either 1 or 2.. make sure off power saving mode. The only game I few lag... I mean its really LAG!! Is cobtract killer 2. Duno why. At first I tot bcuz error dl so I clear cache and re-dl, things still same..
I still using it, both launcher got pros and cons, why no company can did extreme launcher like Nova or Apex. Hmmm...
What I like on S III NatureUX launcher
- Clean interface, Jelly Bean like app drawer. Easier add widgets.
- Cool Page Buddy functionality. (In latest v4.1.2 only)
What I dislike S III NatureUX launcher
- Memory resource hunger, not really good in 1GB RAM device like S III.
- Lagging due to 1GB RAM issue, it actually perform quite well in 2GB Note II.
- Auto restart launcher due to 1GB RAM issue as well, never happen in 2GB Note II.
- Switching to Widget page is really lagging on 1st few seconds. Widget page never stick like Jelly Bean stock.
- Cannot drag and drop apps icon to auto create folder, need manual create before can drag and drop.
-------------------------------------------------
What I like on Xperia Z launcher
- Less resource use, no auto restart launcher issue in 1GB S III.
- Smooth performance.
- Drag and drop app icon auto create folder.
- Beauty interface.
What I dislike on Xperia Z launcher
- Add widgets is silly, why Sony pick Go launcher idea.
- Screen switching is not that convenience due to no preview when pinching the launcher.
My new layout - still base on Xperia Z launcher, newer v3.0.0


Good comparison. But may I ask, how to know stock launcher will keep restart? And also, why it eat huge memorry?