Graphics sucks. Gameplay rules.

Graphics is for ENHANCING a good game, but nothing can save a crap game even with great graphics.

If i've a choice between same great game and better graphics, of course i'll choose the better gfx version, but if there's none, i'll choose the better game.

Anyway, seems like most people agreed with Gameplay over Graphics.

Not a very good example. btw, IMO GTASA
graphics=sucks
gameplay=average
frane rate = playable

Furtheremore, there's the XBOX and PC version if u dun want to stick with a crummy PS2 version. And as everyone knows, Rockstar isn't famous for good graphics. All their games have average graphics even on a high-end PC. They just don't make games with good graphic engines.(IMO, not much good games either other than overhyped violent games and selling based on hype, sex and mindless violence..)

There are many games that shows the PS2 can do much more than that.

Ahhh...you see that is for AVERAGE GAMERS. See? We're the ELITE, SEASONED, HARDCORE GAMERS....

So we leave those fools to look at pretty pictures and wet on it while REAL MEN like us play the REAL GAMES.

Nope, not necessary. Guess what.
Best racing sim game=?? What else...Gran Turismo series (eventhough i dun play it, sim-racing nuts swore by it)

Best Arcade Racing game=BurnOut series (not available on PC), NFS just isn't fast or mad enough!!!

And anyway, suprisingly, those games can match most racing games on the PC graphically despite inferior hardware.

Friend...how can you put controls LAST!!! in fact, controls is tightly woven with gameplay. A sucky control joypad or mechanism will destroy the whole gameplay. With sucky controls, there simply isn't going to be good gameplay! This is especially critical for action, racing, platform games etc except for JRPGs though as turn based is not that demanding on controls.