Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Ford Focus Owner/ Fan Club, Go Further

views
     
Dwango
post Nov 25 2013, 05:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(craving @ Nov 25 2013, 04:28 PM)
Same thought, my friend was in my car and was asking " how come the engine sounds like an old car? " i was so sad & dissappointed sad.gif
*
I thought comments will be on the jerk, but rather it's the sound of the engine this time. Anyway, don't let other opinions influence you too much. Cheer up and don't be too sad.
Dwango
post Nov 26 2013, 07:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(Ken77 @ Nov 25 2013, 06:13 PM)
The' defect" is very subjective to individual. I'm sure nobody would want to buy a car package with grinding sound and jerking even is minimal.

I'm just a  Ford Focus driver who showing my little comments  and resentment after driving for 5 months.

Hope Ford salesman or Simedarby Auto Connection staff able to feedback  Ford Thailand with return solution.
*
Well, I apologise beforehand but that's where the inaccuracy in your comment lies in your notion that "nobody would want to buy a car package with grinding sound and jerking even if minimal". I think you are speaking for yourself or a minority who have possibly regretted in getting the Focus for these jerks and grinding sound issues.

As mentioned earlier, these issues are very minimal and only occassionally happen at low speeds. Other more receptive or non-critical owners have considered them as non-issues.

I am not sure if your vehicle is showing more serious jerks than other vehicles that had caused much resentment on your part. If it is, then I hope Sime Darby would fix the problem for you soon. If not, then I suppose the jerks and grinding sound are something that is inherent in the Focus, something that cannot go away. Even worldwide reviews had mentioned about these.


Dwango
post Nov 26 2013, 07:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(craving @ Nov 25 2013, 05:59 PM)
my car is around 7 weeks old, the "tak tak tak" sound driving me nuts.
*
QUOTE(Ken77 @ Nov 25 2013, 06:15 PM)
Yes Craving.

Forgot to mentioned about the "Tak Tak" annoying sound too.

Mine occur normally during the first gear? How about yours?
*
No "tak tak" sound in my vehicle. About 4 months old.
Dwango
post Nov 26 2013, 04:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(kl98 @ Nov 26 2013, 03:39 PM)
Here is a somewhat candid head to head between the Focus and the Skyactiv. The SkyActiv come out tops in terms of performance.
*
The interior of the Mazda 3 SKyactiv looks very bland, plasticky and grey. Not as upmarket as the Focus. Some people in the US have test-driven both and results were mixed, but the comments on the bland interior of the Mazda were consistent.
Dwango
post Nov 27 2013, 09:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(falconhour @ Nov 26 2013, 10:36 PM)
Want to ask why there is no Malaysian version of Ford Focus Service Booklet? The Service Booklet I had shows All Ford models except Malaysia and furthermore it shows 20,000 KM or 40,000 KM? Is that normal?
*
Maybe you want to consider writing in to Sime Darby if you are interested to know. THe response from the customer service is pretty quick. Since the Focus is rolled out from the Thailand factory, Ford have not included Malaysia as a country into the booklet. The booklet appears to be worldwide that cater for countries in certain regions, except for Malaysia.

Is it normal? Interesting question. It's abnormal to produce a service booklet that may not serve a purpose, but is normal in the sense all Focus owners in Malaysia are getting the same service booklet. At least there it is clear the service interval is 10,000km as written in one piece of leaflet given by Sime Darby, the free service vouchers. I presume you have that.

Dwango
post Nov 27 2013, 09:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(dares @ Nov 26 2013, 04:58 PM)
In the context of Malaysia the comparison may not be accurate, since Mazda dropped the compression ratio of the Skyactiv 2.0 to accomodate our fuel.
*
Apart from the potential "slight" difference in the Skyactive engine, I presume the interior and fit-n-finish of the new Mazda 3 Skyactiv that we are getting here in Malaysia is the same as the one in the US since it is a global model. After all, the Mazda 3 will be a CBU model in Japan when it is launched here in the earlier phases or batches.

The engine will only affect the power in acceleration. Handling and driving dynamics, I think it will be almost similar.

This post has been edited by Dwango: Nov 27 2013, 09:21 AM
Dwango
post Dec 5 2013, 01:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(choowh @ Dec 5 2013, 12:06 PM)
battery died again !! is getting on my nerves...

i've been very careful past few days and make sure i lock the car at all times. now i need to send to service center...need to arrange auto assist to jump start... another day wasted..
*
I have continuously read about your battery being dead, for the 4th time already isn't it? Personally, even if you don't lock the car and the battery still goes dead when the car is only less than 6 months old, then I think something is wrong with the electronics of your car. Sorry to hear about your problem and I hope the guys at the SC will manage to find out the root of the problem and resolve it once and for all.
Dwango
post Dec 6 2013, 04:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(choowh @ Dec 6 2013, 02:43 PM)
lowkl,

replied your pm at 1pm saying that i manage to start the engine this morning. 20minutes ago, same shit happen. Couldn't start !!

Called Puchong service center and they told me battery no stock. They will contact the manager and seek his advice.

I will follow your advice. Will definitely post it on Ford FB later

Keep you guys updated.

anyone want to buy my sport+ candy red with nice number plate...i can give discount...
*
Not considering to give the service centre in KL a try? Heard that this particular SC is better in troubleshooting major problems.
Dwango
post Dec 19 2013, 03:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(gr8fr8 @ Dec 19 2013, 03:20 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Ic. I didn't know S has stiffer suspension. All I know is the different size rims, and other bits and bobs. In S, is it considered "too stiff" for older passengers to be comfortable? Read from other reviews that it handles the uneven road surfaces very well. Does that apply to the S model too?
*
The hatchback Sports model has stiffer "sports-tuned" suspension, as described both in brochures and also sales advisors. As for whether it's too stiff for older passengers, that will depend on the old passengers themselves as different folks have different expectations. Personally I wouldn't get the Sports if you plan to ferry older passengers in the back seat. The suspension is stiffer and the dark-colored fabric seat makes it look like the space is smaller compared to the light-beige leather seats of the sedan.

Handling of the hatchback is indeed superb. Test drive one and find out for yourself. But the gear transmission can get a bit erratic at low speeds when compared to the smoothest transmissions around particularly those from the Japanese makes.
Dwango
post Dec 23 2013, 09:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(SportyHandling @ Dec 23 2013, 10:51 AM)
Thanks. Fortunately my wife is more tolerant with sportier driving manners. If my parents or in-laws are on board on the same journey, there is no way I could drive the way I did up to Genting Highlands. Having said that, I didn't really test the car near to its limits yet. If I were alone driving the car I could have had more fun. :-)

I'm only on the sedan, so I could imagine what the hatchback could offer with increased levels of handling. Apart from the impressive power on tap, one very noticeable aspect that is worth mentioning about the Focus is the low body roll of the vehicle during cornering. The is no feeling that the vehicle is going to topple over or turn upside down when taking sharp corners at moderate speeds(that feeling is very high with the Nissan Sylphy). The vehicle is stable during cornering with very low body roll. Coupled by the light and responsive steering, it gives the driver a sense of full control over the vehicle with a sportier drive.
*
Reminds me of a rather similar experience when I was returning to KL from Kuantan on Karak highway. Pure fun especially the 20km twisty stretch that is leading to the toll at KL. Not that i was driving exceptionally fast. About 120km/h on the bends and 150km/h on the straights. Not too sure where are the usual locations of the speed trap on this highway but I always attempt to go past the highway limits once I'm close to the toll.

This post has been edited by Dwango: Dec 23 2013, 09:29 PM
Dwango
post Dec 25 2013, 10:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(sigmagadget @ Dec 25 2013, 07:42 AM)
RM87.7k for a less than 1 year old model. Since the seller is a 2nd hand car dealer, the original owner must have traded in the car less than the selling price, at least RM5k cheaper. That's more than RM30k depreciation after about 1 year.
Dwango
post Dec 26 2013, 11:38 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(lowkl @ Dec 25 2013, 08:48 PM)
Since this is a non-Plus model, the sticker price is RM112.7K (can't include insurance, road tax, etc.). Most likely he/she enjoyed a certain degree of discount... let say RM3K? That would make it RM109.7K nett. I believe you are right that the 2nd hand dealer would need to make RM5K to make it worth their while... that would make the selling price to the dealer around RM82.7K. So RM82.7K/RM109.7K is around 24% 1st year depreciation.

I just did a comparison with a 2012 Honda Civic 2.0 (a purported leader in terms of resale value here)... on Carlist.my the average is going around RM111K. Using identical logic as above, the actual resale value would be RM106K and using the list price of RM127.6 less maybe RM3K in discounts, it would be RM106K/124.6K which is around 15%.

We have to see how it goes the 2nd year onwards, but usually the year-to-year depreciation between brands is a bit less than the initial year's plunge. Also, we have to take into account the FoFo's increasing popularity narrowing the gap somewhat.

Oooo!! We also have to factor in the 3 year free maintenance into the picture.

So we lose out.. what?.... RM20K after 5 years compared to a (yawn) Honda/Toyota? That is RM4K a year... a bit over RM300 per month extra? RM300 for:

- the sheer joy every time we get into the driver seat?
- being cushioned in styling & trim at least a class above?
- the exhilaration of being pressed back from the acceleration at almost ANY initial speed?
- the pin-sharp handling?

Damn good deal, if you ask me!!
*
Yes, I concur with the above. I am not really relating to the depreciation of the Ford Focus alone but the overall depreciation of all vehicles. Once a downpayment is made on a new vehicle, I mean ANY new vehicle, the owner would have already lost RM20k+/- on the spot. Perhaps the depreciation of the Ford Focus is slightly higher, though I agree what we are getting in the quality, handling and performance of the car outweigh the lower resale value of it.

For those who value or cherish good handling, he/she would find it difficult to go back to a Honda or Toyota once he has experienced the driving dynamics of the Focus. Not forgetting the points you have highlighted above in the interior trim and fit and finish of the Focus (especially the Titanium sedan) which looks and feels premium in comparison to the mundane and cheap-looking Japanese. And yes, not forgetting the powerful acceleration. Man the Focus can surely speed at anytime with incredible burst of energy when called for. Truly an enthusiast car. It's not a sports car, but well, it's close as it double up as a practical family sedan.
Dwango
post Dec 26 2013, 01:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(usucx @ Dec 26 2013, 11:24 AM)
Guys,

Check this out!! World Best Selling Cars in 2013

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/20...ther-surprises/
*
In Forbe's list, World's Best Selling Cars In 2013 :-

1) Ford Focus - approaching 1.1 million sales (oh yeah)
2) Toyota Corolla - 1,001,141 sales, lost its crown as the world's most popular car in 2012
3) Volkswagen Jetta - 905,869 sales
4) Hyundai Elantra - 866,000 sales
5) Chevrolet Cruze - 729,000 sales
6) Toyota Camry - 728,230 sales
7) Volkswagen Golf - 720,440 sales
8) Ford Fiesta - 705,287 sales
9) Honda CRV - 697,955 sales
10) Volkswagen Polo - 686,000 sales

Where are Toyota Vios and Honda City. Perhaps these models are only in great demand in Malaysia and not worldwide.
Dwango
post Dec 28 2013, 11:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
Anybody pumped in RON97 in place of RON95 and notice some differences in engine performance and acceleration?
Dwango
post Dec 28 2013, 07:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(pin86 @ Dec 28 2013, 03:43 PM)
I am on ron97 now. Next tank will use 95. Once I go 95 I try my best to make a good review.

What should I measure? Fuel consumption, acceleration. What else?
*
Thanks. I guess just acceleration and fuel consumption will do. In the user manual, it was mentioned that RON95 is minimum. Not too sure if RON97 will yield better results. Usually minimum RON92 is mentioned in the user manuals of other vehicle makes.

This post has been edited by Dwango: Dec 28 2013, 07:56 PM
Dwango
post Dec 31 2013, 08:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(grayfoxmy @ Dec 30 2013, 09:49 PM)
To achieve the 8.2 second, they turn off the Traction Control, tune to S level gear shift, start with optimized RPM and had a drag race track. Had different tyres and it was the hatchback version.

It was a optimized condition to achieve that. Still, if you peddle to metal, I think it can achieve around sub 10 seconds?



You can see it by fast foward to 4:17
*
"Start with optimised RPM". That is quite punishing to the brakes and will wear it off quickly since we need to press on the brakes AND the accelerator at the same time I guess, before we release the brakes as the car leaps forward at the touchline. Guess that is how a faster 0-100km/h time is obtained, instead of launching it from zero RPM.
Dwango
post Dec 31 2013, 08:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(rooks @ Dec 30 2013, 09:54 PM)
The video below is showing the sedan is using Michelin Primacy LC tyres, any Titanium (plus & non-plus) owners can confirm this?


*
Funny if the sedan is getting Primacy LC tyres since my impression is all sedans from Thailand get the Goodyear. Perhaps the dealer at that particular Ford branch has swapped out the Goodyear for the Michelin Primacy LC?
Dwango
post Dec 31 2013, 03:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(0304125 @ Dec 31 2013, 11:31 AM)
Sounds like initial D, brake and accelerate at the same time.
*
Yes, I doubt actual owners would try that just to achieve a better 0-100km/h time unless he's a hardcore racer or something.
Dwango
post Dec 31 2013, 03:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(styloh @ Dec 31 2013, 11:16 AM)
Guys, where do you place your GPS or handphone while driving? Any recommendations where to get some mounts for Focus?

Also I wonder if anyone managed to get something like this for the boot:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/160686725166?ru=...1860996&afsrc=1
*
I rarely use GPS but if i did have the GPS on my phone, it will be on my lap.
Dwango
post Jan 4 2014, 11:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(styloh @ Jan 2 2014, 11:13 AM)
Guys, I'm using Ron95 and currently my total mileage is 500++ km, and the reading is 9.3km/100km.

I wonder if Ron97 will give better mileage? I saw some of the focus owner clocking 6.x/100km and some 7.x/100km
*
I just pumped in RON97 recently. Instead of RM90+ with a full tank of RON95, I was getting RM120+ with RON97. Even if RON97 gives better mileage, I don't think it will be affordable to use RON97 with the difference in pricing between RON95 and RON97. However, power feels great!

3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0546sec    0.50    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 02:40 PM