Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
DOWN clock ? DOWN clock ?, can down clock burn the CPU ?
|
charge-n-go
|
Sep 4 2006, 11:14 AM
|
|
QUOTE(miraged @ Sep 3 2006, 03:55 PM) from what i understand.. downclocking also will cause CPU, VGA or whatever u downclock to heat up... how come? hmmmm..... try to think of it as the voltage, supplied, not being used up... if u downclock. downclocking it doesn't use up all the power. I don't really understand what u r trying to say and why downclocking heats up component? What do u mean by voltage, supllied and not being used up? and how downclocking doesn't use up all the power?
|
|
|
|
|
|
charge-n-go
|
Sep 4 2006, 09:05 PM
|
|
Actually the effect of downclock and undervolt is much less serious compared to overclock and overvolt. Well, I'm not sure how exactly undervolt can kill CPU, but undervolt inappropriately WILL make the CPU unstable.
However, I don't think underclocking CPU without decreasing Vcore can destroy the CPU in anyway. The theory is simple. A merc can run at 180kph and 60kph well, and running at 60kph actually can preserve the engine more than running at 180kph.
Another fact to backup my point is that, both AMD and Intel use undervolt and downclock to reduce the idle core. They are striving even harder to develop better mechanism to implement undervolt + downclock more aggressively in future. If this is going to kill the CPU or shorten the lifespan, why AMD and Intel is heading towards this direction?
|
|
|
|
|
|
charge-n-go
|
Oct 20 2006, 11:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 6 2006, 01:10 AM) Conroe's lowest multi is 6 so you do the maths lor. Tak jimat banyak really. Merom can jimat banyak, because default multi can go as high as 15x. With low bus speed, 6x can actually brings the CPU below 1000MHz. Well, Core2 Duo initial design is for laptop usage, high FSB is not the target. So i guess 6x is pretty sufficient for initial usage.
|
|
|
|
|