Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Networking ASUS Malaysia Networking User & Technical Support, Managed by ASUS Malaysia Representative

views
     
ericlawyh
post Feb 4 2016, 11:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(ASUSmy @ Jan 19 2016, 03:55 PM)
Hi ericlawyh,

I am still waiting the reply from my RD, will get back to you ASAP.

Thank you
*
Hello ASUSmy,

Is there any update from your RD pertaining to the horrible NAS performance on RT-AC1200HP?

Any firmware update or configuration optimization can address this issue?

If there is no any resolution, will Asus admit that its router's NAS capability simply can't perform? yawn.gif
ericlawyh
post Feb 4 2016, 11:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(netken @ Feb 3 2016, 08:44 PM)
I have updated to the above firmware.

I plugged in my 1TB My Book WD but it cannot detect, it is on FAT32.

I plugged in my thumdrive - router detect immediately, it is also on FAT32.

how to solve it? thanks.
*
I encountered the similar issues before on my WD 2 TB & WD 3 TB external HDD.

Simple solution: Keep the minimal folder(s) and file(s) at root directory level. You can expand the folder structure at sub directory level.
ericlawyh
post Feb 4 2016, 04:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(netken @ Feb 4 2016, 11:46 AM)
bro what do umean by folders and files at root level? because i just wipe and reformat clean on FAT32, there isnt any files inside?
*
If that's clean HDD, you may try with other cable or other formatting option.

ericlawyh
post Mar 8 2016, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(Harddisk @ Feb 29 2016, 11:08 AM)
USB storage access speed on my RT-AC66U is very bad. Is this due to hardware limitation of the router?
*
QUOTE(Harddisk @ Feb 29 2016, 06:39 PM)
Hi,

As tested on LAN port, the download from router's USB drive was 11mB/s without other disk activity. Destination disk is SSD.

Is this acceptable speed or considered in slow range?
*
In fact, I have already raised the similar issue with the pathetic USB performance with Asus AC router. doh.gif

Till now, there is still no resolution from ASUSmy pertaining to my issue posted. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by ericlawyh: Mar 8 2016, 11:19 AM
ericlawyh
post Mar 8 2016, 02:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(rjflyguy @ Mar 8 2016, 12:04 PM)
Hmm... I haven't test my RT-AC55UHP yet on the USB performance. I will test it tonight and post the result here. BTW, what is the acceptable speed? There must be some sort of benchmark speed if we want to say the speed we are gettimg is slow or fast... Anyone?

- RJ -
*
Some simple maths: With connected wireless LAN speed of 300 Mbps, theoretically max throughput should be ~ 37.5 MB/s.

In realtime usage:
- Wireless file transfer using normal Windows Explorer Copy & Paste: 1.74MB/s
- Wireless file transfer using SCP Protocol: 0.05625MB/s Download, 0.0875MB/s Upload


Screenshots:
- https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...post&id=5795280
- https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...post&id=5744279
ericlawyh
post Mar 9 2016, 11:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
Based on the abovementioned discussion:
- RT-AC55UHP ~ 3-4 MB/s transfer rate (USB 2.0, wireless connection)
- RT-AC1200HP ~ 1-2 MB/s transfer rate (USB 2.0, wireless connection)

ASUSmy, mind to share your lab tested results from your research department?
ericlawyh
post Mar 9 2016, 11:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
Question: With connected wireless LAN speed of 300 Mbps, using theoretically max throughput of 37.5 MB/s, what performance can ASUS router deliver?

As mentioned as earlier, the advertised 3200 Mbps / 2334 Mbps / 1900 Mbps / 1750 Mbps / 1167 Mbps are very misleading.

How can ASUS router performs as advertised when its advertised max throughput internal transfer can't even achieve 10% of its 300 Mbps wireless N connection?
ericlawyh
post Mar 9 2016, 04:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(pl95077 @ Mar 9 2016, 02:36 PM)
ericlawyh to be honest you are a little bit too over, on this sentence. "As mentioned as earlier, the advertised 3200 Mbps / 2334 Mbps / 1900 Mbps / 1750 Mbps / 1167 Mbps are very misleading."

1. This is not referring to USB connection speed, it is referring to kind of stream speeds and max wireless transmission potential. Some of the AC3200 offer Tri-band which means segmenting 3 areas of antenna power for segmented networks. That is also how they get up to that big number. IT IS NOTHING RELATED TO USB.

2. ASUS can't advertised what they want like what you mentioned, 3200 Mbps / 2334 Mbps / 1900 Mbps / 1750 Mbps / 1167 Mbps or so on. This is a standard created and maintained by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) LAN/MAN Standards Committee (IEEE 802). It has to go through some testing before it came to market.
*
Forget about all those sales & marketing gimmick or so-called standards, just another simple scenario to explain with:

I can only drive a BMW with 40 km/h on an empty two / three / four lanes highway.

Does it ever make sense?

Or because the highway lanes are full with potholes and crappy surface which stopping me from fully speeding the BMW?

This post has been edited by ericlawyh: Mar 9 2016, 05:01 PM
ericlawyh
post Mar 10 2016, 11:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
voncrane & rjflyguy,

Oh yeah! I'm awaiting ASUSmy to give such lame T&C, then I shall give in & move on...
ericlawyh
post Mar 10 2016, 11:14 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(voncrane @ Mar 9 2016, 05:09 PM)
BMW Representative replies: Sir, based on our extensive research, carried out by world regulated & extremely proficient engineers. This BMW can theoretically reach and surpass speeds of up to 300 km/hr*. Amazing right? A 10% increase from the previous model.

*Testing carried out on perfectly tarred roads within a controlled environment.. Facts and figures for illustration purposes only...

I'm sorry.. Just had to joke around..  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif
*
Hehehe...

Volkswagen has thought exactly the same before the diesel gate was blown...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by ericlawyh: Mar 10 2016, 11:16 AM
ericlawyh
post Mar 21 2016, 02:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(ASUSmy @ Mar 16 2016, 03:21 PM)
Hi ericlawyh,

Sorry for the late reply, I have asked my HQ and me my self also tested, the average speed when transferring files are around 3.xMB/s on the 2x2 RT-AC1200HP. Below image is my result.

The testing is done in line of sight, within 10 feet, connected to 5GHz WiFi and transferring 4k video files.

And it seen like your result are 50% of what we have tested.

You can bring back to the place you bought for warranty claim. I will request the unit for further testing on my site. 

Thank you.
*
Thanks for the reply.

Did you achieve the 3.xMB/s for upload, download or both?

Oh yeah, I bought the device from Lazada, which was couriered from Penang to Selangor... Is there any alternative resolution available?
ericlawyh
post Mar 21 2016, 02:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(blacktubi @ Mar 13 2016, 12:12 PM)
I want to chip for the issues mentioned here. Feel free to correct me. smile.gif

USB storage performance
The router supports the USB 3.0 protocol but that does not mean the CPU is optimised for that. NAS exists for a reason. The recently released RT-AC5300 is hardware accelerated for file transfer and I manage to achieve near to 100MB/s. Check out the test on my site. smile.gif

Check out the Wireless 2.4Ghz professional menu, there is an option for USB 3.0 interference. You can improve performance with that. USB 3.0 interferes with Wireless 2.4Ghz. Always use Ethernet for a proper benchmark.

Wireless Performance
Take the RT-AC55UHP for example. Asus advertise is as AC1200. That is combined throughput of all the bands. AC1200 = 867Mbit on 5Ghz + 300Mbit on 2.4Ghz rounded up.

Want to know the actual wireless throughput? Conduct an iPerf3 test. I get 300+Mbit with the RT-AC55UHP on 5Ghz. That is on the best case with good PCIE wireless card and a close distance. Don't expect to get the full claimed throughput especially on 2.4Ghz. Interference, attenuation and noise exist.

My test on RT-AC55UHP
[attachmentid=6161304]
16MB/S write and 20MB/s read on my external HDD. Samba with guest login enabled. Conducted via Ethernet LAN.

20MB = 160Mbit. You need 160Mbit on wireless to achieve this kind of speed. rolleyes.gif
*
Oh my... My pocket is not deep enough to own a RT-AC5300 with 100MB/s capability... sweat.gif
ericlawyh
post Mar 22 2016, 11:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(ASUSmy @ Mar 21 2016, 04:06 PM)
Hi ericlawyh,

Yes, tested download and upload is 3.xMB/s.

Do you mind providing me the router serial number?

Thank you
*
Have PM you the serial number.

Look forward to hearing you soon. smile.gif
ericlawyh
post May 11 2016, 03:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
116 posts

Joined: Oct 2015
QUOTE(katyPerry @ May 11 2016, 03:00 PM)
Hi, I would to get your advice to get ASUS Wireless Router to replace UNIFI router.

my requirements:
1. No need 5Ghz, 2.4ghz is sufficient
2. Support bandwidth control per IP, eg: limit certain IP upload and download speed
3. Single storey house coverage
4. Support 30MB UNIFI bandwidth
5. Budget less than Rm500

Seem like only RT-N18U and RT-N14UHP match my needs. What are their difference ? and you have another suggestion ? Thanks
*
If you budget is less than RM500, why not getting the RT-AC1200HP? It's an entry level AC class dual band router.

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2615sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 03:02 PM