Public NonBlooD's Gallery., Im back with my D50. :)
Public NonBlooD's Gallery., Im back with my D50. :)
|
|
Mar 26 2006, 12:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Wahlao babyk everyday complain about focus, WB and noise only?
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2 2006, 02:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
The Nikkor DX 55-200 for 4k? What new lens is that? The existing DX 55-200/4-5.6 is less than RM1k ...
|
|
|
May 2 2006, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Haha get lar the ZD 40-150/3.5-4.5. It's only about RM1k, and covers you more or less the same range as the DX 55-200. It's a more suitable pairing with your (assumed) ZD 14-45/3.5-4.5 kit lens. The ZD 50-200/2.8-3.5 ED is a pro-grade lens, complete with weather sealing, to compliment the ZD 14-54/2.8-3.5 ED that comes with the original E-1.
|
|
|
May 2 2006, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Hehe you seems to want to spend alot on your equipment. I don't know what your ISO limits are within the bounds of the camera's performance, but I think the aperture's plenty bright (considering most competing lenses in this range end with an F/5.6). Do you already have the FL36?
|
|
|
May 2 2006, 08:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Hahaha and I thought "why on earth am I not able to shoot light streaks like that after so many years of owning a camera??!!". It turns out that I have to go burn a bush first.
LoLz ... |
|
|
May 2 2006, 08:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
But the sun won't be up in the air like that! LoLz hahaha ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2006, 05:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Yeap, making the most of your kit lens is very good - no need to upgrade your gear when u're not pushing it past its limits yet. The seaside/sunset pictures from up north? What area/resort is that?
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 04:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Hmm ... poor/inconsistent white balance? And underexposure exagerrates the noise. What body are you using again?
|
|
|
Jul 25 2006, 09:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
OMG is that cat trying to eat the chicken?
|
|
|
Jul 26 2006, 03:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,775 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Yeah it's OMG weird man! Hahaha ... I know chicks are supposed to be hot, but that's a rooster mind you ... Hahaha ...
|
| Change to: | 0.0226sec
1.18
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:29 PM |