Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Vios 2013

views
     
SUSjolokia
post Sep 2 2013, 10:54 PM

So Hot It Burns..!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: May 2013


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Sep 2 2013, 10:04 PM)
If you know jolokia personally, he should be able to tell you more inside exclusive story where you will agree with me. As for NASA, it refers to local company that you know. Jolokia is using that name too, aren't you supposed to shoot him?

Almera gets to sell cheap for being inferior than Vios and Preve turbo techincally and physically, therefore it gets to set price at Preve price range. If you know how to check technically, you could tell the Almera tech is overall inferior than Vios.

Talking about City, its 5AT is nothing more than old 4AT gearbox added 1 smaller gear behind. Unlike old Camry 5AT gearbox that really have bigger first 2 gears for stronger assist from idle. The Jazz hybrid is throwing price as it is no match against Prius in FC. It's getting just slightly better than Vios in city driving. City vs Vios, Vios wins anytime in acceleration when loaded and FC.
*
Aik ! despite we know each other since AW forum, but I don't think I know u personally..lol..

NASA is our Dr.. Jayraptor secret code lah ! he afraid NAZA may sue him, though I am not sure what would NAZA get for suing him ? him laoya Forte EX kosong which still have 4 years loan ? ..hmmm.....

Simply add in another gear behind ...lol.. how to fit in the gearbox then ? use a hammer to knock2 for additional space ? U think shimano bicycle meh.. simply bantai... So why not add in another gear in front them mah have bigger first gear loh...correct or not, total rubbish theory.

JCDrew90
post Sep 3 2013, 11:33 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
Anyone knows of a good SA? Planning to get this ride smile.gif
jayraptor
post Sep 6 2013, 08:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(jolokia @ Sep 2 2013, 10:43 PM)
No lah ! according to Dr.. Jayraptor NAP will only allowed them to sell cheaper if they reduce some ingredients, Attrage already reduce 1 cylinder to 3 cylinder, reduced 300cc to 1.2 ltr, reduced 100kg to 950kgs, so they are allowed to sell at 59K...rofl....
*
Yes, that is correct. You can continue to pretend you don't know anything about setting car price here despite you are well verse with the regulation.

Attrage sits between A & B segment based on its dimension. Its engine is only 1.2L 3-pot whereas P1 & P2 models come with 4-pot 1.3L yet RM10-20k cheaper therefore it passed. Almera is B-segment with real weak engine equivalent to present day 1.4L only, so you can set price range close to Preve that could beat your product in terms of size, power, handling.

As far as I recalled, you don't dare to use NAZA at all when comes to talking bad. You would add 'K" behind earlier but later you turned to use NASA too.


SUSjolokia
post Sep 6 2013, 09:41 PM

So Hot It Burns..!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: May 2013


QUOTE(jayraptor @ Sep 6 2013, 08:50 PM)
Yes, that is correct. You can continue to pretend you don't know anything about setting car price here despite you are well verse with the regulation.

Attrage sits between A & B segment based on its dimension. Its engine is only 1.2L 3-pot whereas P1 & P2 models come with 4-pot 1.3L yet RM10-20k cheaper therefore it passed. Almera is B-segment with real weak engine equivalent to present day 1.4L only, so you can set price range close to Preve that could beat your product in terms of size, power, handling.

As far as I recalled, you don't dare to use NAZA at all when comes to talking bad. You would add 'K" behind earlier but later you turned to use NASA too.
*
Ur memory getting corrupted badly, poor thing u have skip ur medication again aren't u, when was ur last visit to the asylum ?

How would I know anything about NAP ? u think I work in MITI ah ? U r indeed a nutcase or what Kaylcar call Numb Nuts (Right ? Auntie AYap)

Since when I use NAZAK ? I had always use NAZA, just that for the sake of answering ur postings I use NASA so that ur distorted mind don't get confused.

R U saying NAP only allowed car with lower spec to compete with P1, how come Forte r allowed to sell at P1 price with more ingredients ? how about citra vs exora ? so now u mean Rio also reduced ingredients ?? What crap u r talking about is contradicting isn't it.




Irfan2397
post Sep 7 2013, 09:08 AM

Please dont stalk me!!!
******
Senior Member
1,693 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: THe Hell



Anybody interested to get Vios 2013?Pm/WhatApps me at 0162090827 for the greatest deal in town thumbup.gif .Vios 2013 Official Launch will be on October.Book now you can get your car on End October or Early November
mat79
post Sep 7 2013, 09:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,011 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
nap was revised in 2009. to make it clear,no hidden in fta agreement coz its a sign agreement between countries,not manufacturers. any undisclosure n wrongly information will be deemed as offend n the country that breaking the agreement will be sued in international court n the country product will be banned n will be penalised as what happened prior 2005, n i do get my info from legitimate source :-).

no wonder toyota managed to grab sales despite overpricing their products. in before,nap,but new one, goodwill :-)
mat79
post Sep 7 2013, 09:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,011 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
n keyword jay, across asean region. not only in malaysia.
mat79
post Sep 7 2013, 09:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,011 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
what happened prior 2005 not bcoz undisclosure or breaking the agreement, it happened due to not enter or agree with fta at all. even not agree got penalised. agree but undisclosure, thats mean war.
EnergyAnalyst
post Sep 7 2013, 05:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,125 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
I wonder if I should quote this as my siggy!? What do you think?
EnergyAnalyst
post Sep 7 2013, 05:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,125 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
QUOTE(7thSeal @ Dec 10 2012, 05:50 PM)
the looks of the new vios feels like sex  thumbup.gif  thumbup.gif
*
I meant this
SUSjolokia
post Sep 7 2013, 05:43 PM

So Hot It Burns..!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,274 posts

Joined: May 2013


QUOTE(mat79 @ Sep 7 2013, 09:21 AM)
nap was revised in 2009. to make it clear,no hidden in fta agreement coz its a sign agreement between countries,not manufacturers. any undisclosure n wrongly information will be deemed as offend n the country that breaking the agreement will be sued in international court n the country product will be banned n will be penalised as what happened prior 2005, n i do get my info from legitimate source :-).

no wonder toyota managed to grab sales despite overpricing their products. in before,nap,but new one, goodwill :-)
*
How on earth a fairer FTA cause Toyota sales to surge despite higher price ??
This is blind bashing !
I don't think we have ever followed the FTA rules or else fake national car like NAZA would not be allowed. Why r we giving special treatment to South Korean car despite we did not sign FTA with them ??
Opps I forgot I saw Cerato advertisement on a famous building which have advertising led all over it..lol..

This post has been edited by jolokia: Sep 7 2013, 05:45 PM
kamilnu
post Sep 9 2013, 02:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,170 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
Long live God car!!
brothercheong
post Sep 10 2013, 07:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
68 posts

Joined: May 2012
i saw thailand ad on new vios have "v control" anyone know any details on this?
jayraptor
post Sep 11 2013, 10:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(jolokia @ Sep 6 2013, 09:41 PM)
Ur memory getting corrupted badly, poor thing u have skip ur medication again aren't u, when was ur last visit to the asylum ?

How would I know anything about NAP ? u think I work in MITI ah ? U r indeed a nutcase or what Kaylcar call Numb Nuts (Right ? Auntie AYap)

Since when I use NAZAK ? I had always use NAZA, just that for the sake of answering ur postings I use NASA so that ur distorted mind don't get confused.

R U saying NAP only allowed car with lower spec to compete with P1, how come Forte r allowed to sell at P1 price with more ingredients ? how about citra vs exora ? so now u mean Rio also reduced ingredients ?? What crap u r talking about is contradicting isn't it.
*
Don't have to deny, could always refer your earlier comments on AW. Forte is still priced more than RM10k above the most expensive P1 model when launched in Dec '09 despite rebadged.

Only your obsolete tech Almera get to price on P1 Preve level. The new Mitsu Attrage 1.2L only get to be priced below RM70k by having small 3pot engine and smaller chassis. You know why they can't set it cheaper at RM60k? Because it has more advanced tech than your Almera, its CVT gearbox is even stronger than your Teana/Sylphy CVT.
mat79
post Sep 11 2013, 11:06 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,011 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(jolokia @ Sep 7 2013, 05:43 PM)
How on earth a fairer FTA cause Toyota sales to surge despite higher price ??
This is blind bashing !
I don't think we have ever followed the FTA rules or else fake national car like NAZA would not be allowed. Why r we giving special treatment to South Korean car despite we did not sign FTA with them ??
Opps I forgot I saw Cerato advertisement on a famous building which have advertising led all over it..lol..
*
fta agreement isnt just for afta. fta also include in cept agreement. even cept agreement was signed with japan,korea n many other countries. it does not just for automotive sector,but many more. fta doesnt mean no local tax,jus trading tax impose to other countries products that being ommited while maintaining the same tax treatment as local products.

read carefully my friend on my previous comment,i didnt mention fta causing the surge increase of sales of toyota despite higher price,just that people acceptance of the higher price bcoz of toyota brand n some still blaming the nap or fta or what soever reason to justify the buying of expensive less equip n less safety toyota car,despite other car makers can make it less for more,even at the same price point of toyota.

i just hope toyota can give atleast the same equip car as per rival with their current price offer.

just wonder,which part im bashing fta causing toyota sales soars high even pricing higher due to fta?

10 Pages « < 8 9 10Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0239sec    0.63    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 01:48 AM